Talk:City region (United Kingdom)

This article was nominated for deletion on 14 October 2020. The result of the discussion was redirect.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

England Mid‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Urban studies and planning

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Urban studies and planning, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Urban studies and planning on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Urban studies and planningWikipedia:WikiProject Urban studies and planningTemplate:WikiProject Urban studies and planningUrban studies and planning articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Edinburgh

If this article is about ENGLISH as oppopsed to UK politcs why does Edinburgh in Scotland get a mention?— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.30.232.17 (talk) 08:58, 29 February 2012

Rewrite

This article needs to be rewritten from scratch. The original version was OK apart from an absence of reliable sources, but since then there have been various inaccuracies added, as well as the ridiculous drive-by over-tagging. It's an embarrassment. It's an area in which I have some professional expertise (which I had hoped would be well behind me now, but oh well...), so will endeavour to rewrite it at some point when time allows - not to a formidably high standard, but to a standard that will do. Thoughts welcome. Ghmyrtle (talk) 15:45, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

PS: Ten months later... yet another failed resolution. D'oh.... Ghmyrtle (talk) 12:40, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External link

The current external link is to something in Lorem Ipsum - [1] may be a more suitable link. Jackiespeel (talk) 18:41, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on City region (United Kingdom). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130129110402/http:/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151222105519/https://www.glasgow.gov.uk/index.aspx?articleid=13045 to https://www.glasgow.gov.uk/index.aspx?articleid=13045

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:30, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on City region (United Kingdom). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081006231316/http://www.thenorthernway.co.uk/page.asp?id=51 to http://www.thenorthernway.co.uk/page.asp?id=51

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:44, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Leeds

what happened to Leeds City Region ? Also please note that Barnsley is shared with Sheffield City Region. I think it is because people residing in Barnsley commute to both Sheffield & Leeds for work. J mareeswaran (talk) 16:02, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yep this article and the combined authority one is a shambles 🤦 Dan100 (Talk) 10:03, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]