Talk:Chalais-Meudon

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Multiple issues notice

It's more than a year since this was added, and nothing has happened. I've now expanded the intro para, and plan to remove the Lead too short notice soon.

As the original author of the article, I still think that the structure is fine. The headings are relevant and descriptive, and their sequence follows the timeline of the text. As no-one has implemented or suggested any alternative structure, I also plan to remove the Cleanup reorganize notice in a week or so.

Any thoughts? Lestocq (talk) 12:38, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

For someone that does not know anything about this, it is difficult to know how to parse the sections. It is not clear at first sight what is their context. I would expect sections to follow standard guidelines/conventions as much as possible, with clear meaning that is independent of the topic. For example: "History", "Facilities", etc. From the current section titles it is not even clear whether the uses are still actual or they are historical uses, unless you read the whole section. I hope this helps to explain my tags. Ita140188 (talk) 13:49, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for your speedy reply. I've now added a History main heading to clarify that it's all history apart from the Modern uses section which includes a Wikilink to ONERA, the current users. I think it's an improvement, and hope that it's enough to justify removal of the tags. Lestocq (talk) 15:04, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tags now removed.Lestocq (talk) 11:42, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]