Jump to content

Talk:Brian David Gilbert

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 16:49, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Source: [1] for Stranger Things; [2] for ABBA; [3] for health insurance
Moved to mainspace by Vigilantcosmicpenguin (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 17 past nominations.

— Vigilant Cosmic Penguin 🐧(talk | contribs) 16:48, 19 September 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: The hook is really interesting, good to go! 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 08:04, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The hooks is, in fact, interesting, good, and backed up by three reliable sources. You might consider posting to Wikipedia talk:Did you know#Halloween set (this has no impact at all on approval; I just don't know if you've seen the discussion there). I looked over the article for compliance with policies and noticed a couple of minor issue to resolve:
  • For "His popularity from Polygon enabled him to create his own content full-time."(24 September 2024) the source supports the order of events but only speculates on causality. If there's not a more direct source, I'd suggest moving this to the beginning of the paragraph and writing chronologically as a topic sentence, something like, "After developing a fanbase on Polygon, Gilbert began to create his own content full-time."
  • For "invoked leftist themes",(24 September 2024) is there a more clear verb to use here? (employed? included?)

@Vigilantcosmicpenguin: {{ping}} me and I'll mark this back as approved, Rjjiii (talk) 04:04, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Page quality

[edit]

It seems like whoever wrote much of the biography starts the sentences with the same word "He" over and over. Have edited it, but to what standard is this page's quality actually being held? There are awkward grammar choices made all over this thing.

This issue mostly presented between the opening paragraph and early life, boldly edited these issues, but was more curious as to how it went so long looking this badly written. MaddWiki (talk) 10:47, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, it looks like you're new here, so welcome to Wikipedia! You did a good job making the lead read better, but I wanted to point you to Wikipedia's manual of style, specifically our guideline on words to watch. You began a sentence with "His most notable previous work..." which is considered editorializing by this guideline. Also, a statement like "He is currently the fact checker..." is proscribed because it'll become a dated statement in the near future. I know some of these rules might not seem obvious, and they're not intended to be exact rules, but they aim for a certain level of consistency in style. Thanks for helping to improve this article! — Vigilant Cosmic Penguin 🐧(talk | contribs) 17:00, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]