Talk:Back in Action (EP)/GA1
GA Review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: Locust member (talk · contribs) 01:56, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
Reviewer: CatchMe (talk · contribs) 15:50, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
I will start this review today. CatchMe (talk · contribs) 15:50, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thank u!! Locust member (talk) 18:26, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
Good Article review progress box
|
Well-written
[edit]- Perhaps a nitpick, but I'd rather put "the deluxe edition cover features a colorized version of the same image" in a Efn instead.
Done
- I see that you put a bit of Background information in the lead of your articles, but I don't think they warrant a standalone sentence there since "greater detail is saved for the body of the article", per MOS:INTRO. "It was released by Simple Stupid and Geffen Records on September 21, 2021. Since emerging in the 2020 digicore scene, he released two extended plays and signed with Geffen in June 2021." - "It was released by Simple Stupid and Geffen Records on September 21, 2021, as his first release with the labels after emerging in the digicore scene."?
- Done Changed to what you recommended. Admittedly, you are much better at making sentences flow than I am.
- "Inspired by a variety of musicians, he produced the EP along with a variety of record producers" - there's "a variety of" twice.
- Done changed former to "various".
- "It also contains" - just "It contains".
- Done
- Shouldn't "The EP received a positive review..." be before the promotion and deluxe sentences in the lead?
- Done
- "Midwxst released his second extended play (EP), Summer03, in March 2021. He emerged as an artist during the digicore scene in 2020." - I think 2020 should be before 2021..
- Done
- I believe the fact that it was his first EP with the label should be in Release and promotion instead of Background and recording.
- Done
- "He further commented" - "He also commented" to avoid repetition with the "further"s before that?
- Done good catch
- "both have a sound reminiscent of Whole Lotta Red (2020) by the American rapper Playboi Carti" - according to Goldner?
- Done
- "reminiscent of The Life of Pablo (2016) by the American rapper Kanye West" - same as before.
- Done
- "A deluxe edition of the EP, titled Back in Action 2.0, was released on December 15, 2021, and includes four extra tracks" - "and includes four extra tracks" may be unnecessary since it's already stated in Songs.
- Done
- "Goldner found the tracks" - "found" is under MOS:SAID.
- Done
Verifiable
[edit]- Earwig's Copyvio shows Violation unlikely with 27.5%. Good!
- All sources are considered reliable.
- The use of ref 3 after "ever been in" could be removed per WP:REPCITE.
- Done
- It seems you confused the Pitchfork source with the NME source in the Review scores table.
- Done how the hell did I do that
- Spot-check with numbers as of this revision:
- Ref 1 verifies the release of Summer03 in March 2021, that he emerged as part of the digicore wave (ref 2 verifies the year), and three of the four featured artists (ref 4 complements it). For its fourth use, it does not verify the release date or labels.
- Done replaced the fourth use with Apple Music.
- Ref 2 verifies he "broke through" in 2020 and is associated with hyperpop.
- Ref 3 verifies that he signed with Geffen and the EP is the first with them, the statement about the studio sessions and standout tracks, and that "Star" is the intro song for the shows.
- Ref 4 verifies his opinion about the hyperpop tag, three of four featured artists (ref 1 complements it), the "gap between hyperpop and hip-hop" thing, the Phineas and Ferb thing (omg?), and the meaning about the hook of "Made It Back".
- Ref 5 verifies... all of that and Hale's opinion.
- Ref 1 verifies the release of Summer03 in March 2021, that he emerged as part of the digicore wave (ref 2 verifies the year), and three of the four featured artists (ref 4 complements it). For its fourth use, it does not verify the release date or labels.
Broad
[edit]- This article covers the essential information without going into unnecessary detail.
Neutral
[edit]- Yes, it is neutral and mentions the critics' points of view.
Stable
[edit]- No edit wars and barely no other editors.
Illustrated
[edit]- The cover artwork has non-free use rationale and its use is relevant and appropiate for this article.
Final comments
[edit]This looks great, @Locust member: I will put this 
On hold for now. CatchMe (talk · contribs) 21:54, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for the quick review! I addressed all comments, let me know if I missed anything. Also, I also changed "reviewers" in lead to "Pitchfork" since I realized the tracks were compared to the albums by the same reviewer. Locust member (talk) 23:46, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- This looks good to go. I will ✓ Pass this now. Congrats!! CatchMe (talk · contribs) 02:22, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.