Talk:Austin–Bergstrom International Airport

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Austin–Bergstrom International Airport article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Aviation: Airports

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the airport project.

This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

Spoken Wikipedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that are spoken on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Spoken WikipediaWikipedia:WikiProject Spoken WikipediaTemplate:WikiProject Spoken WikipediaSpoken Wikipedia articles

United States: Texas / Austin C‑class Mid‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Texas portal This article is supported by WikiProject Texas (assessed as High-importance).
	Texas portal This article is supported by WikiProject Texas - Austin (assessed as Top-importance).

Frontier Destinations

It's basically impossible to determine where Frontier flies from Austin directly via their own website. Looks like the best method instead is to use Kayak's "direct" feature, which appears to top out at 20 destinations. Iansltx (talk) 05:02, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

San José vs San Jose

A bit of semantics here, but should it have the é or e. San José usually is associated with the one in Costa Rica, while San Jose usually is associated with the one in California, however I don't think it is technically incorrect to say San José, CA.63.246.176.247 05:23, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Top carriers

According to the Austin Business Journal (November 27, 2006),[1] United Airlines has closed the gap on Delta Air Lines for the fourth top carrier at ABIA. The difference in October was only about 5,000 passengers. Here's the list:

October 2006

LUV, 247,646 (up 5 percent compared to 10/2005)
AAL, 194,750 (up 3.5 percent)
COA, 91,793 (up 7 percent)
DAL, 49,936 (down 5.5 percent)
UAL, 44,267 (up 8.5 percent)
NWA, 20,288 (down 27 percent)
USA/AWE, 20,198 (down 14 percent)
JBU, 19,710
FFT, 16,101 (up 25.5 percent)

January to October 2006

LUV, 2,422,220 (up 10 percent)
AAL, 1,911,030 (up 6 percent)
COA, 836,625 (up 10 percent)
DAL, 472,342 (down 15.5 percent)
UAL, 408,388 (up 0.5 percent)
USA/AWE, 220,679 (down 1 percent)
NWA 203,058 (down 30 percent)
JBU, 183,407
FFT, 152,340 (up 13 percent)

Clipper471 17:51, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

local color

There are several Austin-local concessions in the gate area. Originally there were plans to try to integrate the airport more with the life of the community, but everything got stuck behind security checkpoints after 9/11... AnonMoos (talk) 11:38, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Street Address

Added street address to article: 3600 Presidential Boulevard, Austin, Texas. Semper Fi! FieldMarine (talk) 01:54, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Virgin America use of the term Nerd Bird

Virgin America named one of their planes #nerdbird referring to a SFO->BOS flight. Also confusing matters, a charter of the Virgin America #NerdBird from AUS->LAS to the CES 2013 flight was frequently referred to as a NerdBird flight. The specificity of the flight segment gets further watered down by Virgin America with Nerd Bird references to LAX->SFO and upcoming SFO->AUS service. Nerd Bird seems to have morphed into a term referring to a technology employee commuter flight and not a specific flight segment. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stagr.lee (talk • contribs) 17:14, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FWIW, American's AUS-SJC flight was called the "nerd bird," although this was probably a colloquialism and not used in marketing. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 19:25, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Facilities section editing

Recently I heard a rumour that the South Terminal will be reopened with Allegiant, Public Charters, and Frontier possibly moving to the South Terminal facility.

I'm thinking that if and when that happens we should move the terminals from the "Facilities" section into its own "Terminals" with the subheadlines "Barbara Jordan Terminal" and "South Terminal" respectively.

Thoughts?

EricTheLinguist (talk) 09:49, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

American Eagle service to ORD

American Eagle started this on May 7, 2015 and flights ended on June 4, 2015. This service is then a Saturday only seasonal service with flights bookable on aa.com in October 2015 until March 2016. So therefore this is a seasonal flight and start date is not needed as per WP:AIRPORT-CONTENT. 97.85.113.113 (talk) 00:27, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

South Terminal Reopening Negotiations are Being Finalised

According to the city council they are looking to reopen the South Terminal^[1] (Item B). It's up for consideration on 18 June. P.S. What's the situation with the page being locked due to an editing dispute? EricTheLinguist (talk) 22:11, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ http://austintx.swagit.com/play/06092015-538

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Austin–Bergstrom International Airport/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

There need to be more references and citations for this page.Gittinsj 02:00, 19 March 2007 (UTC)gittinsj[reply]

Last edited at 23:08, 12 August 2013 (UTC). Substituted at 08:38, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Austin–Bergstrom International Airport. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:18, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

~ Delta designates AUS as a focus city `~

"Last year, Delta designated Austin as one of its four “focus cities” with the potential for more direct flights and larger planes" ~ ~mitch~ (talk) 22:02, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"The SkyTeam Alliance carrier classifies Austin [...] as focus cities" and the article continues with the following quotes;

The director responsible for "network planning at Delta" Amy Martin was quoted to say:

We've chosen these focus cities based on a strong economic environment and, really, areas where we think the Delta product will really make a difference,^[1]

and "managing director" of Ailevon Pacific, Brad DiFiore said "on the focus city strategy":

Delta wants to be the premier network carrier in all these markets,^[1]

References

^ ^a ^b Russell, Edward (June 7, 2019). "ANALYSIS: What makes a focus city for Delta?". FlightGlobal. Retrieved August 7, 2019.

Southwest Flight 1392

As I write this, the Flight 1392 ground fatality incident has a Wikipedia article, but it is being considered for deletion so I did not link it. I'll circle back once the issue is resolved. Carguychris (talk) 14:24, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Graphic "sourced" to Wikidata query

This reversion of my reversion re-added a graphic whose only hint of its provenance is a little line, "See source Wikidata query", just below it. When one clicks on that link to see the real source so one can confirm the data, one sees... well, one sees an SQL query. For most people, this is totally opaque, as it rather is for me, although I've worked with SQL myself. I see nothing here that tells me where the data points came from.

Bouzinac, your edit summary said, "Wikidata is not unsourced as it is the backbone of wikipedia, such as info for infoboxes", but that's exactly the problem with Wikidata, as it's not easy to see who's adding what from where. In this case, it's even more difficult, as the fields used for the query are not only hidden in the Wikidata, but the query itself comes out of the blue. Is this something you wrote? Has it been tested/approved/blessed by somebody? By whom? Where'd this all come from? — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 22:40, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It is not SQL but SPARQL, the query language Wikidata can be queried with. The code looks at first complicated because there are many calculation rules (add months if they are present, add years only if they have preferred/normal Wikidata rank, add international and domestic passenger same year if they are present, etc). If you go down the sparql, hit a blue arrow button and it will show both the figure and the source stating the figure. It queries the result from there http://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q1430913#P3872 , which anyone can edit and update. The disadvantage is indeed it can look at first cryptic, but when one understoods, and the advantages are here, it's very simple to edit and update, with sources inside for each statements, available cross-wikis, cross pages, for instance here http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/List_of_the_busiest_airports_in_the_United_States#Statistics (AUS is not inside the US graph but you get the idea of Wikidata advantages, eg another example : http://fr.wiki.x.io/wiki/A%C3%A9roport_international_Austin-Bergstrom#Statistiques ). Another advantage is that a single file batch could update a whole bunch of airports with a file upload inside Wikidata, with sources in a few seconds. thus AUS has got fresh 2020 data :) You can ask questions to the http://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:WikiProject_Aviation, if you wish so. Tools that could help edit and find lack of data/correction data could be found here http://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:WikiProject_Aviation/Airport_traffic. Bouzinac (talk) 23:13, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well, thanks for the information. I would never have clicked that arrow at the bottom if you hadn't pointed me to it. Is this a query you yourself wrote? Are there tools to help generate similar queries?

I don't much like the user-friendliness (meaning, "reader-friendliness") of this approach, as I don't think most readers would be impressed if they clicked through from the page they were reading, but I can see its usefulness for us editing types. I've been hesitant about doing anything in Wikidata, as I find the interface quite off-putting, but maybe I'll give it more of a chance after I look more closely at the links you've provided. Thanks, — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 23:33, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The UX experience of Wikidata is bad, I'm afraid to be agreeing with you ; but it's very useful when one comprehends how to use it. You can have a "excel-like" tabular data with that tool http://ru.wiki.x.io/wiki/%D0%92%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%BF%D0%B5%D0%B4%D0%B8%D1%8F:WE-Framework. Some patronage queries I've worked with other people can be found there http://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Bouzinac/Fr%C3%A9quentations . Other queries for airports (list in a country, search, etc : here http://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Bouzinac/Airports_lists --Bouzinac (talk) 12:33, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello JohnFromPinckneyagain. You might be interested into that "visual querying tool" here (still on testing stage) https://query-builder-test.toolforge.org/ --Bouzinac (talk) 13:54, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]