Talk:Ala Littoria

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ala Littoria article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Aviation: Airlines

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion not met

This article is supported by the airline project.

Italy Mid‑importance

	Italy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Companies Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Merger proposal

I propose this merger as the subject is not notable enough for a stand-alone article and the airline article would benefit from it's inclusion--Petebutt (talk) 21:52, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DISAGREE. I totally disagree with the merger proposal, because I think the article is notable like the one in the it.wikipedia that I used as a reference when I created the stub. Indeed I am going to enlarge the article with translations of excerpts from the original Italian article (it:Linea dell'Impero). Furthermore, I think Wikipedia needs to be enlarged and not reduced with mergers: I plan to write a similar article about the "Imperial Route" (or 'Eastern Route') of the UK's Imperial Airways from London to India/Australia.--Nmolos (talk) 13:32, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If there really is sufficient quantity and quality of information about that route - which, I am afraid, will take some doing - the split can still be performed. An intended future extension of the article is no reason to not merge now. And no, IMHO we do not want lots of articles, we want good articles, in whatever quantity. Jan olieslagers (talk) 14:27, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I Disagree for the same reasons of Nmolos. Both are good articles IMHO, and should remain separated.--Prosimy (talk) 02:36, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I Disagree. After one year the tag is going to be removed. BD — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:CD95:5860:45BD:83B1:2C4:653E (talk) 04:21, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Misguiding controversy in the description of crash on 4 December 1939

Following the database record of the Aviation Safety Network (see Aviation Safety Network: Accident Description), the article insists, that the 1939 crash of Ala Littoria Junkers Ju 52/3mlu occured

struck a hillside near Bayerisch Eisenstein, Germany, at an altitude of about 1000 meters (3281 feet) during the final leg of a flight from Munich to Berlin

However, since Bayerisch Eisenstein is near Munich, not Berlin, one of two claims of the abovequoted statement is wrong:

either the accident took place soon after the takeoff, i.e. during the first (and not the final) leg of a flight from Munich to Berlin,

or the airports in the flight description should be itemized in the reverse order, i.e. "from Berlin to Munich"

Since we cannot change this apparent controversy at the source of information, I suppose to make the relevant clause in our reference to this database record. Cherurbino (talk) 09:39, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Ala littoria.svg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:34, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]