Talk:Airspeed Ltd.
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Advanced engine?
[edit]Far be it from me to disagree with the great Norway, but a 250 hp engine in the 1930s is supposed to be a great loss of some sort? Maury Markowitz (talk) 20:42, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
- The aircraft design had already occurred and if a different AM compliant engine was needed at a higher cost then it's a financial loss for Airspeed.GraemeLeggett (talk) 21:39, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
Assessment comment
[edit]The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Airspeed Ltd./Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
.
|
Last edited at 19:09, 17 August 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 06:55, 29 April 2016 (UTC)