Jump to content

Talk:Aditi Sharma (actress, born 1983)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Aditi Sharma. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:12, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. Community Tech bot (talk) 20:51, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 13 November 2019

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (non-admin closure) Colin M (talk) 22:26, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Aditi SharmaAditi Dev Sharma – Correct name 2409:4055:70C:770C:0:0:1155:A0B1 (talk) 17:44, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 23:30, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Move discussion in progress

[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Aditi Sharma (actress) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 23:48, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 28 October 2020

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Pages moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Jerm (talk) 01:28, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


– there is two Aditi Sharma and both are television actresses (Aditi Sharma (actress) so it’s better to have this name so people don’t get confused. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2a01:4c8:64:fcc0:ddad:c665:acce:18f (talk) 12:52, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Requested move 1 May 2022

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Aditi Sharma (actress, born 1983)Aditi Dev Sharma – Popular/Common name of the actress and that can also be found in sources too, example of such sources includes this and this, and many more. Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 21:31, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Although that form of her name is found in some sources it appears to be most common without Dev. Gab4gab (talk) 22:57, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Gab4gab:It is clear that if you are looking for "Aditi Sharma", you're looking for about 2 to 3 notable persons, but if you're looking for "Aditi Dev Sharma", you're looking for one notable person. Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 11:00, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It should be clear that I am addressing how to name articles in Wikipedia, not how to search the internet for someone. Our standard for how we name biography articles is how reliable sources commonly refer to the subject. None of the sources used in the article include Dev in her name. Your two examples do not show that the name commonly used includes Dev. How we can search most exclusively for the one person of interest is not how we choose article names. A redirect for Aditi Dev Sharma might be useful for people searching Wikipedia. Gab4gab (talk) 11:34, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Gab4gab: It is good to ping a user when you're directly talking to them. Well, I understand what you're saying, searching can also be done on Wikipedia, not only the internet. I only feel the current title seems not too okay when the persons name is there and also shown in some sources. Moving the page was not something hard for me to do but I know it will be controversial that's why I decided we discuss first. But I still maintain what my view is which is "when you say Aditi Sharma, there are more people, then you start differentiating them. But when you say Aditi Dev Sharma, it refers to one person. Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 12:09, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Melody Idoghor: We should attempt to follow Wikipedia policy and guidelines when we can. I am in favor of following the guidance found at WP:MIDDLENAME, which says to use the most common format of a name used in reliable sources. If you believe that the format including the middle name is most common then you need to make that case. The sources used in the article appear to strongly counter the two examples you provided. Gab4gab (talk) 12:29, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Gab4gab: You didn't get my name correctly, it's "Idoghor Melody" as in User:Idoghor Melody. Well I do agree with what you say. While I still maintain my position of the move, let's hear other opinions. Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 12:43, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Idoghor Melody: are you pursuing your personal preferences rather than following community consensus? Have you found any Wikipedia policy or guidelines that supports your preference? The same move was proposed in 2019 and not implemented. What has changed since then? Gab4gab (talk) 12:55, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Gab4gab: Like I said above, I agree with you. Maybe someone should just close this discussion while I create a redirect. The thing is, moving the page or creating a redirect wasn't a big deal when I came across it yesterday as I'm a contributor at Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Redirects and categories and created over 200 redirects but I deemed necessary to ask or suggest before I do anything as I noticed it has been controversial. So o, going ahead to create the redirect while someone closes this discussion. Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 13:52, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Idoghor Melody: Thank you. I admit I was confused when you said you agreed and maintained your position on the move. Gab4gab (talk) 14:19, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Gab4gab: Redirect created, waiting for a closer. Or maybe I'll just do it myself. Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 14:31, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.