Jump to content

Talk:1990 Serbian constitutional referendum

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good article1990 Serbian constitutional referendum has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 1, 2024Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on September 8, 2024.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the 1990 Serbian constitutional referendum also took place at six voting stations in Montenegro for voters who were on holiday?


Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 17:23, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • ... that the 1990 Serbian constitutional referendum also took place at six voting stations in Montenegro for voters who were on holiday? Source: Grković, Branislav (30 December 2021). "Ko nas je do sada šta pitao – na referendumima?" [Who asked us what – on referendums?]. Istinomer (in Serbian). Archived from the original on 14 August 2023. Retrieved 29 July 2024.
5x expanded by Vacant0 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 7 past nominations.

Vacant0 (talkcontribs) 21:12, 29 July 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.
Overall: Ten citations were cross-checked for issues—none arose. A machine translator was used for sources in Serbian. Prose was checked for issues; I was alarmed by the lack of "the" before party abbreviations, but it seems that this was intended. The parties' articles, most of which have Good Article status, consistently exclude "the", as if the abbreviations are acronyms. Good to go, overall. Yue🌙 00:40, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]