Draft:IBR

• Comment: None of the sources even mention the term IBR. The purpose of an encyclopedia article to summarize what the cited sources say and not to interpret their meaning. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 20:33, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

---

IBR

IBR is an acronym that stands for Indigenous, Black, and Racialized. It describes a collective identity that emphasizes the unique experiences and challenges faced by Indigenous and Black communities within the broader context of racialized groups. The term has gained traction as an alternative to BIPOC (Black, Indigenous, People of Color), particularly in discussions about systemic racism and social justice.

Origin and Context

The term IBR emerged in the late 2010s and early 2020s as activists, scholars, and community organizers sought more precise language to reflect the distinct historical contexts of Indigenous and Black peoples. In Canada, where discussions about race often highlight issues of colonialism and systemic oppression, IBR serves to prioritize Indigenous identities alongside those of Black communities. This shift acknowledges that while both groups face racism, their experiences are shaped by different historical and social factors.

Rationale for Use

• Recognition of Distinct Experiences: IBR aims to acknowledge the specific historical injustices faced by Indigenous peoples, including the impacts of colonialism. Research indicates that Indigenous individuals often experience higher rates of discrimination compared to other racialized groups. For example, a report by Statistics Canada noted that Indigenous people face systemic barriers in various sectors, including healthcare and education.

• Coalition Building: The use of IBR is intended to foster solidarity among Indigenous and Black communities while recognizing their unique struggles. Community organizations such as the Scherman Foundation have adopted language that includes IBR in their mission statements to emphasize their commitment to supporting Black, Indigenous, and racialized communities in achieving social and economic justice.

• Critique of BIPOC: Some advocates argue that the term BIPOC can oversimplify complex identities by grouping diverse racial experiences together. By using IBR, proponents aim to emphasize the specific narratives associated with Indigenous and Black identities without diminishing their individual histories. Discussions on platforms like The BIPOC Project highlight the importance of centering relationships among these communities to address shared yet distinct challenges.

Contemporary Usage

IBR is increasingly utilized in academic literature, policy discussions, and community organizing to highlight the specific challenges faced by Indigenous and Black populations. For instance, the BIPOC Caucus at Carleton University aims to support Black, Indigenous, and racialized students within its Criminology program by implementing support systems that address issues related to settler colonialism and systemic racism.

Additionally, advocacy groups have published materials that explicitly use IBR to address issues such as land rights for Indigenous peoples and anti-Black racism. The Center for Racial Justice in Education emphasizes racial justice as a guiding principle in its mission to dismantle patterns of racism in educational settings.

Conclusion

As conversations about race continue to evolve, IBR represents an ongoing effort to create inclusive language that accurately reflects the unique histories and struggles of Indigenous and Black communities. Its emergence highlights a broader movement toward recognizing intersectionality within discussions of race and identity.

See Also

• BIPOC
• Racial identity
• Systemic racism
• Intersectionality