Jump to content

2020 United States Senate special election in Arizona

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

2020 United States Senate special election in Arizona

← 2016 November 3, 2020 2022 →
 
Nominee Mark Kelly Martha McSally
Party Democratic Republican
Popular vote 1,716,467 1,637,661
Percentage 51.16% 48.81%

Kelly:      50–60%      60–70%      70–80%      80–90%      >90%
McSally:      50–60%      60–70%      70–80%      80-90%      >90%
Tie:      50%      No data

U.S. senator before election

Martha McSally[a]
Republican

Elected U.S. Senator

Mark Kelly
Democratic

The 2020 United States Senate special election in Arizona was held on November 3, 2020, following the death in office of incumbent Republican U.S. Senator John McCain on August 25, 2018. Governor Doug Ducey was required by Arizona law to appoint a Republican to fill the vacant seat until a special election winner could be sworn in.[1][2] On September 5, 2018, Ducey appointed former U.S. Senator Jon Kyl to fill McCain's seat. However, Kyl announced he would resign on December 31, 2018.[3]

On December 18, 2018, Ducey announced that outgoing U.S. Representative Martha McSally would be appointed to fill the seat following Kyl's resignation.[4] McSally was sworn in as the state's junior U.S. Senator on January 3, 2019, less than two months after she was defeated by Democrat Kyrsten Sinema for Arizona's Class 1 U.S. Senate seat.[5] McSally ran to complete the term, defeating skincare executive Daniel McCarthy in the Republican primary. She faced former astronaut Mark Kelly,[6] who ran uncontested in the Democratic primary. Primary elections took place on August 4, 2020.[7]

Once a reliably Republican state, Arizona trended more purple in the late 2010s. Kelly significantly outraised McSally and led by about 5% in the average poll leading up to Election Day.

Kelly defeated McSally by a margin of 2.4% on election night, thereby flipping the seat Democratic. As a result, he outperformed Joe Biden in the concurrent presidential election, who defeated President Donald Trump by a margin of 0.3% in the state, but underperformed his polling average. Kelly became the first Democrat to win the Class 3 Senate seat since Carl Hayden won his last term in 1962.[8] This also marked the first time since the 82nd Congress preceding the 1952 election that Democrats held both Senate seats in Arizona.

Kelly was sworn in on December 2, 2020.

Interim appointments

[edit]

Appointees

[edit]

Potential candidates not appointed

[edit]

Republican primary

[edit]

Incumbent McSally faced one challenger: Daniel McCarthy, a skincare company executive. McCarthy's independent wealth was expected to set up a bruising and expensive primary campaign; however, McSally won the primary in a landslide.[16]

Candidates

[edit]

Nominee

[edit]

Eliminated in primary

[edit]
  • Sean Lyons (as a write-in candidate)[19]
  • Daniel McCarthy, skincare company executive[20]

Withdrawn

[edit]

Declined

[edit]

Endorsements

[edit]
Martha McSally

U.S. presidents

State officials

Individuals

Organizations

Primary results

[edit]
Results by county:
  McSally—80–90%
  McSally—70–80%
  McSally—60–70%
Republican primary results[48]
Party Candidate Votes %
Republican Martha McSally (incumbent) 551,119 75.2%
Republican Daniel McCarthy 181,551 24.8%
Republican Sean Lyons (write-in) 210 nil
Total votes 732,880 100.0%

Democratic primary

[edit]

Candidates

[edit]

Nominee

[edit]

Eliminated in primary

[edit]
  • Bo "Heir Archy" Garcia (as a write-in candidate)[19]

Withdrew

[edit]

Declined

[edit]

Endorsements

[edit]

Primary results

[edit]
Democratic primary results[48]
Party Candidate Votes %
Democratic Mark Kelly 665,620 99.9%
Democratic Bo Garcia (write-in) 451 0.1%
Total votes 666,071 100.0%

Libertarian primary

[edit]

Neither one of the write-in candidates received enough votes to secure the Libertarian nomination in the general election.

Write-in candidates

[edit]

Eliminated in primary

[edit]

Primary results

[edit]
Libertarian primary results[48]
Party Candidate Votes %
Libertarian Barry Hess (write-in) 329 76.5%
Libertarian Alan White (write-in) 101 23.5%
Total votes 430 100.0%

Other candidates

[edit]

General election write-in candidates

[edit]

Declared

[edit]

Republican

Democratic

Other

  • Christopher Beckett, veteran (Independent)[81]
  • William "Will" Decker (Independent)[81]
  • Matthew "Doc" Dorchester (Libertarian)[81]
  • Nicholas N. Glenn, Navy veteran and aerospace engineer (Independent Republican)[81]
  • Mathew Haupt (Independent)[81]
  • Benjamin Rodriguez (Independent)[81]
  • Joshua Rodriguez (Unity)[81]
  • Frank Saenz (Independent)[81]
  • Jim Stevens (Independent)[81]

Withdrawn

[edit]

General election

[edit]

Debates

[edit]

Predictions

[edit]
Source Ranking As of
The Cook Political Report[84] Lean D (flip) October 29, 2020
Inside Elections[85] Tilt D (flip) October 28, 2020
Sabato's Crystal Ball[86] Lean D (flip) November 2, 2020
Daily Kos[87] Lean D (flip) October 30, 2020
Politico[88] Lean D (flip) November 2, 2020
RCP[89] Tossup October 23, 2020
DDHQ[90] Likely D (flip) November 3, 2020
538[91] Likely D (flip) November 2, 2020
Economist[92] Lean D (flip) November 2, 2020

Endorsements

[edit]
Martha McSally (R)

Federal officials

State officials

Organizations

Newspapers

Individuals

Polling

[edit]

Graphical summary

[edit]

Aggregate polls

[edit]
Mark Kelly vs. Martha McSally
Source of poll aggregation Dates administered Dates updated Mark Kelly Martha McSally Margin
270 to Win[108] November 2, 2020 November 3, 2020 49.8% 44.8% Kelly +5.0
Real Clear Politics[109] November 1, 2020 November 3, 2020 50.5% 44.8% Kelly +5.7
Average 50.2% 44.8% Kelly +5.4
Polling
Poll source Date(s)
administered
Sample
size[b]
Margin
of error
Martha
McSally (R)
Mark
Kelly (D)
Other /
Undecided
Ipsos/Reuters[110] October 27 – November 2, 2020 610 (LV) ± 4.5% 44% 53% 4%[c]
Change Research/CNBC[111] October 29 – November 1, 2020 409 (LV) ± 4.9% 47% 51% 2%[d]
NBC News/Marist[112] October 29 – November 1, 2020 717 (LV) ± 4.5% 46% 52% 2%[e]
Swayable[113] October 27 – November 1, 2020 333 (LV) ± 7.2% 45% 55%
Data for Progress[114] October 27 – November 1, 2020 1,195 (LV) ± 2.8% 46% 54% 0%[f]
Emerson College[115] October 29–31, 2020 732 (LV) ± 3.6% 48% 50% 2%[g]
Morning Consult[116] October 22–31, 2020 1,059 (LV) ± 3% 44% 48%
Data Orbital[117] October 28–30, 2020 550 (LV) ± 4.2% 46% 47% 7%[h]
Siena College/NYT Upshot[118] October 26–30, 2020 1,253 (LV) ± 3% 43% 50% 6%[i]
Grand Canyon Battleground Poll[119] October 25–30, 2020 910 (LV) ± 3.1% 43% 46% 11%[j]
CNN/SSRS[120] October 23–30, 2020 892 (LV) ± 4.0% 45% 51% 5%[k]
Pulse Opinion Research/Rasmussen Reports[121] October 27–29, 2020 800 (LV) ± 3.5% 43% 48% 9%[l]
Gravis Marketing[122] October 26–28, 2020 704 (LV) ± 3.7% 45% 50% 6%[m]
Ipsos/Reutuers[123] October 21–27, 2020 714 (LV) ± 4.2% 44% 51% 5%[n]
Swayable[124] October 23–26, 2020 286 (LV) ± 7.4% 44% 56%
Justice Collaborative Project (D)[125][A] October 22–25, 2020 874 (LV) ± 3.1% 40% 50% 10%[o]
OH Predictive Insights[126] October 22–25, 2020 716 (LV) ± 3.7% 45% 50% 4%[p]
Univision/University of Houston/Latino Decisions/Latino
Decisions/North Star Opinion Research
[127]
October 17–25, 2020 725 (RV) ± 3.6% 39% 51% 10%[q]
Patinkin Research Strategies (D)[128] October 21–24, 2020 729 (LV) ± 3.6% 46% 53% 2%[r]
Y2 Analytics[129] October 15–24, 2020 700 (LV) ± 3.7% 47% 51%
Susquehanna Polling & Research Inc. (R)[130][B] October 19–22, 2020 500 (LV) ± 4.4% 50% 47% 4%[s]
Ipsos/Reuters[131] October 14–21, 2020 658 (LV) ± 4.4% 43% 51% 5%[t]
Morning Consult[116] October 11–20, 2020 1,066 (LV) ± 3% 44% 48%
Pulse Opinion Research/Rasmussen Reports[132] October 18–19, 2020 800 (LV) ± 3.5% 44% 46% 10%[u]
Change Research/CNBC[133] October 16–19, 2020 232 (LV)[v] 43% 54%
RMG Research[134] October 14–19, 2020 800 (LV) ± 3.5% 39%[w] 49% 15%[x]
37%[y] 49% 15%[x]
40%[z] 44% 15%[x]
Data Orbital[135] October 16–18, 2020 550 (LV) ± 4.2% 42% 48% 10%[aa]
YouGov/CBS[136] October 13–16, 2020 1,074 (LV) ± 4.1% 41% 52% 7%[ab]
Ipsos/Reuters[137] October 7–14, 2020 667 (LV) ± 4.3% 41% 52% 8%[ac]
Monmouth University[138] October 9–13, 2020 502 (RV) ± 4.4% 42% 52% 5%[ad]
502 (LV)[ae] 42% 52%
502 (LV)[af] 45% 51%
Morning Consult[116] October 2–11, 2020 1,144 (LV) ± 2.9% 41% 49%
Trafalgar Group[139] October 6–9, 2020 1,045 (LV) ± 3.0% 45% 47% 7%[ag]
OH Predictive Insights[140] October 4–8, 2020 608 (LV) ± 4.0% 45% 50% 6%[ah]
Ipsos/Reuters[141] September 29 – October 7, 2020 663 (LV) ± 4.3% 41% 51% 8%[ai]
Latino Decisions (D)[142][C] September 28 – October 6, 2020 600 (LV) ± 4% 42% 47% 7%[aj]
Basswood Research (R)[143][D] October 3–5, 2020 800 (LV) ± 3.5% 49% 47% 4%[ak]
Data Orbital[144] October 3–5, 2020 550 (LV) ± 4.2% 44% 49% 7%[al]
HighGround Inc.[145] [1] September 28 – October 5, 2020 400 (LV) ± 4.9% 44% 50% 7%[am]
Change Research/CNBC[146] October 2–4, 2020 296 (LV) 43% 51% 6%[an]
Siena College/NYT Upshot[147] October 1–3, 2020 655 (LV) ± 4.2% 39% 50% 11%[ao]
Patinkin Research Strategies/Arizona Research Consortium (D)[148] October 1–3, 2020 604 (LV) ± 3.8% 45% 50% 5%[ap]
Targoz Market Research[149] September 23 – October 2, 2020 1,045 (LV) ± nil 41% 51% 8%
Morning Consult[150] September 22 – October 1, 2020 1,048 (LV) ± 3% 38%[aq] 51% 10%[ar]
Suffolk University[151] September 26–30, 2020 500 (LV) ± 4.4% 40% 49% 11%[as]
Susquehanna Polling & Research Inc. (R)[152][B] September 25–28, 2020 500 (LV) ± 4.3% 45% 48%
Data for Progress (D)[153] September 23–28, 2020 808 (LV) ± 3.4% 42% 51% 7%[aj]
Morning Consult[154] September 19–28, 2020 ~1,000 (LV) ± 3% 36% 53% 10%[at]
Data For Progress[155][E] September 15–22, 2020 481 (LV) ± 4.4% 38% 47% 15%[au]
Change Research/CNBC[156] September 18–20, 2020 262 (LV) 43% 51% 6%[av]
ABC News/Washington Post[157] September 15–20, 2020 579 (LV) ± 4.5% 48% 49% 3%[aw]
Morning Consult[158] September 11–20, 2020 907 (LV) ± 3%[ax] 40% 49%
Hart Research Associates (D)[159][F] September 17–19, 2020 400 (LV) ± 4.9% 43% 55%
Ipsos/Reuters[160] September 11–17, 2020 565 (LV) ± 4.7% 41% 50% 8%[ay]
Morning Consult[161] September 8–17, 2020 900 (LV)[v] ± (2% – 4%) 41%[ax] 48%
Fabrizio, Lee & Associates (R)[162][G] September 14–16, 2020 800 (LV) ± 3.5% 46% 48% 6%[m]
Redfield & Wilton Strategies[163] September 12–16, 2020 855 (LV) ± 3.4% 35% 53% 13%[az]
Monmouth University[164] September 11–15, 2020 420 (RV) ± 4.8% 44% 50% 5%[ad]
420 (LV)[ae] 46% 50% 4%[ba]
420 (LV)[af] 48% 49% 4%[ba]
Siena College/NYT Upshot[165] September 10–15, 2020 653 (LV) ± 4.1% 42% 50% 8%[bb]
Morning Consult[154] September 5–14, 2020 ~1,000 (LV) ± 3% 38% 50% 13%[bc]
Patinkin Research Strategies/Arizona Research Consortium (D)[148] September 10–13, 2020 679 (LV) ± 3.8% 45% 50% 5%[ap]
Kaiser Family Foundation/Cook Political Report[166] August 29 – September 13, 2020 1,298 (RV) ± 3.0% 36% 44% 20%[bd]
Gravis Marketing[167] September 10–11, 2020 684 (LV) ± 3.8% 43% 48% 9%[be]
YouGov/CBS[168] September 9–11, 2020 1,106 (LV) ± 3.9% 42% 49% 9%[bf]
OH Predictive Insights[169] September 8–10, 2020 600 (LV) ± 4% 42% 52% 6%[bg]
Benenson Strategy Group/GS Strategy Group[170][H] August 28 – September 8, 2020 1,600 (LV) ± 2.5% 45% 48% 7%[bh]
Change Research/CNBC[171] September 4–6, 2020 470 (LV) ± 4.6% 45% 51% 4%[bi]
Redfield & Wilton Strategies[172] August 30 – September 4, 2020 830 (LV) ± 3.4% 38% 53% 8%[bj]
Morning Consult[154] August 26 – September 4, 2020 ~1,000 (LV) ± 3% 39% 50% 11%[bk]
FOX News[173] August 29 – September 1, 2020 772 (LV) ± 3.5% 39% 56% 5%[bl]
853 (RV) ± 3.0% 38% 55% 6%[bm]
Basswood Research (R)[174][D] August 29–31, 2020 800 (LV) ± 3.5% 48% 48% 4%[ak]
Morning Consult[154] August 16–25, 2020 ~1,000 (LV) ± 3% 35% 53% 13%[bc]
Redfield and Wilton Strategies[175] August 16–18, 2020 856 (LV) ± 3.4% 34% 53% 12%[bn]
Morning Consult[154] August 6–15, 2020 ~1,000 (LV) ± 3% 43% 46% 11%[bk]
Emerson College[176] August 8–10, 2020 661 (LV) ± 3.8% 41% 52% 7%[aj]
Change Research/CNBC[177] August 7–9, 2020 428 (LV) ± 4.6% 43% 49% 8%[bo]
Morning Consult[154] July 27 – August 5, 2020 ~1,000 (LV) ± 3% 38% 49% 13%[bp]
OH Predictive Insights[178] August 3–4, 2020 603 (LV) ± 4.0% 43% 48% 9%[bq]
OnMessage Inc. (R)[179][I] August 2–4, 2020 400 (LV) ± 4.9% 48% 48% 4%[ak]
Data for Progress[180] July 24 – August 2, 2020 1,215 (LV) ± 3.2% 40% 50% 10%[br]
Change Research/CNBC[181] July 24–26, 2020 365 (LV) ± 4.8% 45% 47% 8%
Morning Consult[182] July 17–26, 2020 908 (LV) ± 3.0% 36%[aq] 52% 13%
CNN/SSRS[183] July 18–24, 2020 873 (RV) ± 3.8% 43% 50% 7%[bs]
Redfield & Wilton Strategies[184] July 19–23, 2020 858 (LV) ± 3.2% 35% 53% 13%[bt]
Morning Consult[154] July 14–23, 2020 ~1,000 (LV) ± 3% 39% 49% 12%[bu]
Public Policy Polling[185] July 21–22, 2020 816 (V) ± 3.2% 42% 51% 7%[aj]
NBC News/Marist[186] July 14–22, 2020 826 (RV) ± 4.1% 41% 53% 6%[bv]
Spry Strategies (R)[187][J] July 11–16, 2020 700 (LV) ± 3.7% 41% 48% 11%[bw]
Change Research/CNBC[188] July 10–12, 2020 345 (LV) ± 4.6% 45% 52% 3%[bx]
CBS News/YouGov[189] July 7–10, 2020 1,087 (LV) ± 3.8% 42% 46% 12%[by]
OH Predictive Insights[190] July 6–7, 2020 600 (LV) ± 4.0% 43% 52% 6%[bz]
Data Orbital[191] June 27–29, 2020 600 (LV) ± 4.0% 43% 50% 7%[ca]
Gravis Marketing (R)[192][K] June 27, 2020 527 (LV) ± 4.3% 46% 42% 12%[cb]
Change Research/CNBC[193] June 26–28, 2020 311 (LV)[v] ± 5.8% 44% 53% 3%[cc]
Global Strategy Group (D)[194] June 19–24, 2020 800 (LV) ± 3.5% 42% 49% 9%
Change Research (D)[195][L] June 20–23, 2020 946 (LV) ± 3.2% 42% 50% 8%
Redfield & Wilton Strategies[196] June 14–17, 2020 865 (LV) ± 3.3% 34% 49% 17%[cd]
NYT Upshot/Siena College[197] June 8–16, 2020 650 (RV) ± 4.3% 38% 47% 16%[ce]
Civiqs/Daily Kos[198] June 13–15, 2020 1,368 (RV) ± 2.9% 42% 51% 7%[cf]
FOX News[199] May 30 – June 2, 2020 1,002 (RV) ± 3.9% 37% 50% 13%[cg]
HighGround Public Affairs[200] May 18–22, 2020 400 (LV) ± 4.9% 41% 51% 8%[ch]
OH Predictive Insights[201] May 9–11, 2020 600 (LV) ± 4.0% 38% 51% 10%[o]
OH Predictive Insights[202] April 7–8, 2020 600 (LV) ± 4.0% 42% 51% 8%[ci]
NBC News/Marist[203] March 10–15, 2020 2,523 (RV) ± 2.7% 45% 48% 7%
Monmouth University[204] March 11–14, 2020 847 (RV) ± 3.4% 44% 50% 6%
Univision/Arizona State University[205] March 6–11, 2020 1,036 (RV) ± 3.0% 36% 48% 16%
OH Predictive Insights[206] March 3–4, 2020 600 (LV) ± 4.0% 42% 49% 9%[bq]
Public Policy Polling[207] March 2–3, 2020 666 (V) ± 3.8% 42% 47% 12%
HighGround Public Affairs[208] February 7–9, 2020 400 (LV) ± 4.9% 39% 46% 15%
Fabrizio, Lee & Associates (R)[209][G] January 22–24, 2020 1,000 (LV) ± 3.1% 47% 45% 8%
Public Policy Polling[210] January 2–4, 2020 760 (V) ± 3.6% 42% 46% 12%
OH Predictive Insights[211] December 3–4, 2019 628 (LV) ± 3.9% 44% 47% 9%[cj]
Emerson College[212] October 25–28, 2019 904 (RV) ± 3.2% 45% 46% 9%
Change Research (D)[213] September 27–28, 2019 856 (RV) ± 3.3% 45% 47% 8%
Bendixen & Amandi International[214] September 9–12, 2019 520 (RV) ± 4.3% 42% 42% 16%
OH Predictive Insights[215] August 13–14, 2019 600 (LV) ± 4.0% 41% 46% 13%[ck]
Fabrizio Ward/AARP[216] July 29–31, 2019 600 (LV) ± 4.0% 45% 44% 11%[cl]
OH Predictive Insights[217] May 1–2, 2019 600 (LV) ± 4.0% 45% 44% 11%[cm]
OH Predictive Insights[218] February 12–13, 2019 600 (LV) ± 4.0% 46% 44% 10%[o]
Hypothetical polling

with Daniel McCarthy and Mark Kelly

Poll source Date(s)
administered
Sample
size[b]
Margin
of error
Daniel
McCarthy (R)
Mark
Kelly (D)
Other /
Undecided
Change Research[219][L] June 20–23, 2020 946 (LV) ± 3.2% 44% 50% 6%

with Ruben Gallego

Poll source Date(s)
administered
Sample
size[b]
Margin
of error
Martha
McSally (R)
Ruben
Gallego (D)
Other /
Undecided
OH Predictive Insights[218] February 12–13, 2019 600 (LV) ± 4.0% 49% 41% 10%[o]

on whether McSally deserves to be re-elected

Poll source Date(s)
administered
Sample
size[b]
Margin
of error
Yes No Other /
Undecided
Fabrizio Ward/AARP[216] July 29–31, 2019 600 (LV) ± 4.0% 39% 45% 16%[cn]
Public Policy Polling[220] [2] January 24–25, 2019 682 (V) 40% 54% 6%

with generic Republican and generic Democrat

Poll source Date(s)
administered
Sample
size[b]
Margin
of error
Generic
Republican
Generic
Democrat
Other /
Undecided
OH Predictive Insights[140] October 4–8, 2020 608 (LV) ± 4.0% 45% 45% 10%[co]
Targoz Market Research/PollSmart[221] September 23 – October 2, 2020 1,045 (LV) ± 3.0% 44% 42% 14%[cp]
Data For Progress[155][M] September 15–22, 2020 481 (LV) ± 4.4% 45% 42% 15%[au]
Siena College/NYT Upshot[165] September 10–15, 2020 653 (LV) ± 4.1% 44% 50% 6%[cq]
Emerson College[176] August 8–10, 2020 661 (LV) ± 3.8% 41% 46% 13%[cr]
OnMessage Inc. (R)[179][I] August 2–4, 2020 400 (LV) ± 4.9% 43% 43% 14%[cs]
Climate Nexus[222] Feb 11–15, 2020 539 (RV) ± 4.3% 44% 44% 12%[ct]
Fabrizio, Lee & Associates (R)[209][G] Jan 22–24, 2020 1,000 (LV) ± 3.1% 49% 45% 6%[cu]
OH Predictive Insights[211] December 3–4, 2019 628 (LV) ± 3.9% 44% 44% 11%[cv]
Fabrizio Ward/AARP[216] July 29–31, 2019 600 (LV) ± 4.0% 42% 43% 14%[cw]
OH Predictive Insights[223] February 12–13, 2019 600 (LV) ± 4.0% 44% 39% 17%[cx]

Results

[edit]
2020 United States Senate Special election in Arizona[224]
Party Candidate Votes % ±%
Democratic Mark Kelly 1,716,467 51.16% +10.41%
Republican Martha McSally (incumbent) 1,637,661 48.81% −4.90%
Write-in 1,169 0.03% -0.03%
Total votes 3,355,297 100.0%
Democratic gain from Republican

By county

[edit]
By county
County Mark Kelly
Democratic
Martha McSally
Republican
Write-in Margin Total
votes
# % # % # % # %
Apache 24,050 68.47 11,052 31.47 22 0.06 12,998 37.01 35,124
Cochise 24,843 41.35 35,214 58.61 29 0.05 -10,371 -17.26 60,086
Coconino 45,561 62.54 27,255 37.41 29 0.04 18,306 25.13 72,845
Gila 9,648 35.02 17,889 64.94 11 0.04 -8,241 -29.91 27,548
Graham 4,506 30.42 10,303 69.55 4 0.03 -5,797 -39.13 14,813
Greenlee 1,403 38.65 2,225 61.29 2 0.06 -822 -22.66 3,630
La Paz 2,492 34.00 4,835 65.97 2 0.03 -2,343 -31.97 7,329
Maricopa 1,064,396 51.94 984,203 48.03 698 0.03 80,193 3.91 2,049,297
Mohave 27,414 26.66 75,359 73.29 49 0.05 -47,945 -46.63 102,822
Navajo 24,396 47.49 26,952 52.47 21 0.04 -2,556 -4.98 51,369
Pima 309,142 59.84 207,317 40.13 152 0.03 101,825 19.71 516,611
Pinal 79,114 43.18 104,048 56.78 76 0.04 -24,934 -13.61 183,238
Santa Cruz 13,689 70.65 5,685 29.34 2 0.01 8,004 41.31 19,376
Yavapai 51,852 36.49 90,180 63.47 57 0.04 -38,328 -26.97 142,089
Yuma 33,961 49.13 35,144 50.84 15 0.02 -1,183 -1.71 69,120
Totals 1,716,467 51.16 1,637,661 48.81 1,189 0.03 78,826 2.35 3,355,317

Counties that flipped from Republican to Democratic[225]

By congressional district

[edit]

Kelly won 5 of the 9 congressional districts.[226]

District McSally Kelly Representative
1st 48% 52% Tom O'Halleran
2nd 44% 56% Ann Kirkpatrick
3rd 35% 65% Raúl Grijalva
4th 67% 33% Paul Gosar
5th 56% 44% Andy Biggs
6th 52% 48% David Schweikert
7th 24% 76% Ruben Gallego
8th 57% 43% Debbie Lesko
9th 38% 62% Greg Stanton

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ In December 2018, McSally was appointed by Governor Doug Ducey to fill the vacancy caused by the death of Senator John McCain and the resignation of Senator Jon Kyl.
  2. ^ a b c d e Key:
    A – all adults
    RV – registered voters
    LV – likely voters
    V – unclear
  3. ^ "Some other candidate" with 3%; would not vote with 0%; "Undecided/Refused" with 1%
  4. ^ "Refused" and Undecided with 1%; Did not vote with 0%
  5. ^ "Other" and Undecided with 1%
  6. ^ "Other candidate or write-in" with 0%
  7. ^ "Someone else" with 2%
  8. ^ "Refused" with 4%; "Other" with 1%; Undecided with 2%
  9. ^ "Someone else" and would not vote with 0%; "Undecided/Refused" with 6%
  10. ^ "Some other" with 3.5%; "Other" with 7.5%; Undecided with 2%
  11. ^ "None of these" and Undecided with 2%; "Other" with 1%
  12. ^ "Some other candidate" with 4%; Undecided with 5%
  13. ^ a b Undecided with 6%
  14. ^ "Some other candidate" with 2%; would not vote with 0%; Undecided with 3%
  15. ^ a b c d Undecided with 10%
  16. ^ "Refused" with 1%; Undecided with 3%
  17. ^ "Someone else" and would not vote with 2%; Undecided with 6%
  18. ^ Undecided with 2%
  19. ^ "Other" and "Refused" with 0%; Undecided with 3%
  20. ^ "Some other candidate" with 3%; would not vote with 0%; "Undecided/Refused" with 2%
  21. ^ "Some other candidate" and Undecided with 5%
  22. ^ a b c Additional data sourced from FiveThirtyEight
  23. ^ Standard VI response
  24. ^ a b c "Some other candidate" with 6%; Undecided with 9%
  25. ^ Results generated with high Democratic turnout model
  26. ^ Results generated with high Republican turnout model
  27. ^ "Refused" with 3%; "Other" with 2%; Undecided with 5%
  28. ^ "Someone else" with 2%; Undecided with 5%
  29. ^ "Some other candidate" and Undecided with 4%; would not vote with 0%
  30. ^ a b "No one" with 1%; "Other" with 0%; Undecided with 4%
  31. ^ a b With a likely voter turnout model featuring higher turnout than in the 2016 presidential election
  32. ^ a b With a likely voter turnout model featuring lower turnout than in the 2016 presidential election
  33. ^ "Other" with 3%; Undecided with 4%
  34. ^ "Refused" with 0%; Undecided with 5%
  35. ^ "Some other candidate" with 4%; would not vote with 0%; "Undecided/Prefer not to answer" with 4%
  36. ^ a b c d Undecided with 7%
  37. ^ a b c Undecided with 4%
  38. ^ "Refused" with 2%; "Other" with 1%; Undecided with 4%
  39. ^ "Some other candidate" with 1%; "Undecided/Refused" with 6%
  40. ^ Would not vote and Undecided with 3%
  41. ^ Would not vote with 1%; "Someone else" with 0%; "Undecided/Refused" with 10%
  42. ^ a b Undecided with 5%
  43. ^ a b Overlapping sample with the previous Morning Consult poll, but more information available regarding sample size
  44. ^ "Someone else" with 4%; Undecided with 6%
  45. ^ "Other" and "Refused" with 2%; Undecided with 7%
  46. ^ "Someone else" and Undecided with 5%
  47. ^ a b Undecided with 15%
  48. ^ Would not vote with 1%; Undecided with 5%
  49. ^ "Neither" with 2%; would not vote with 0%; "other" with no voters; Undecided with 1%
  50. ^ a b Overlapping sample with the previous and subsequent Morning Consult polls, but more information available regarding sample size
  51. ^ "Not sure/prefer not to answer" with 4%; "Some other candidate" with 3%; would not vote with 1%
  52. ^ "Another Third Party/Write-in" with 2%; Undecided with 11%
  53. ^ a b "Other" with 0%; Undecided with 4%
  54. ^ Would not vote with 1%; "Someone else" with 0%; "Undecided/Refused" with 7%
  55. ^ a b "Someone else" with 4%; Undecided with 9%
  56. ^ "Neither/Another Party" with 4%; "Undecided/Don't know/Refused" with 16%
  57. ^ Undecided with 9%
  58. ^ "Someone else" with 3%; Undecided with 6%
  59. ^ "Refused" with 1%; Undecided with 6%
  60. ^ "Someone else" with 0%; Undecided with 7%
  61. ^ Would not vote with 1%; Undecided with 3%
  62. ^ "Another Third Party/Write-in" with 1%; Undecided with 7%
  63. ^ a b "Someone else" with 4%; Undecided with 7%
  64. ^ "Other" and would not vote with 1%; Undecided with 3%
  65. ^ "Other" and would not vote with 1%; Undecided with 4%
  66. ^ "Third party/write-in" with 1%; Undecided with 11%
  67. ^ Would not vote with 2%; Undecided with 6%
  68. ^ "Someone else" with 5%; Undecided with 8%
  69. ^ a b "Refused" with 1%; Undecided with 8%
  70. ^ "No one" with 10%
  71. ^ "None of the above/neither" with 3%; "other" with 0%; Undecided with 4%
  72. ^ "Third party/write-in" with 3%; Undecided with 10%
  73. ^ "Someone else" with 4%; Undecided with 8%
  74. ^ "Other" with 1%; Undecided with 5%
  75. ^ "Another candidate" with 6%; Undecided with 5%
  76. ^ Undecided with 2%; would not vote with 1%
  77. ^ Undecided with 9%; "Someone else" with 3%; would not vote with 0%
  78. ^ Undecided with 5%; "Refused" with 1%
  79. ^ Undecided with 5.2%; "Other" with 1.8%; "refused" with 0.4%
  80. ^ Undecided with 12%
  81. ^ Undecided with 3%; "Would not vote" with 0%
  82. ^ Undecided with 14%; "Third party/write-in" with 3%
  83. ^ Undecided with 14%; "Another candidate" and would not vote with 1%
  84. ^ "Someone else" with 4%; unsure with 3%
  85. ^ Undecided with 8%; "Other" with 3%; would not vote with 2%
  86. ^ "Undecided/refused" with 5.8%; "some other candidate" with 1.8%
  87. ^ "Refused" with 1%; Undecided with 7%
  88. ^ "Refused" with 0%; Undecided with 9%
  89. ^ "Refused" with 0%; Undecided with 13%
  90. ^ Undecided with 9%; "Would not vote/would not vote for US Senate" with 2%
  91. ^ "Refused" with 1%; Undecided with 10%
  92. ^ Undecided with 14%, refused with 2%
  93. ^ "Other" with 6%; "Refused" with 0%; Undecided with 4%
  94. ^ "Another candidate" with 5%; Undecided with 9%
  95. ^ "Undecided/Refused" with 6%
  96. ^ Undecided with 13%
  97. ^ Undecided with 14%
  98. ^ "Neither candidate or other candidate" with 12%
  99. ^ "Undecided/Don't know/Refused" with 6%
  100. ^ "Other" with 5%; "Refused" with 0%; Undecided with 6%
  101. ^ "Undecided/Don't know/Refused" with 14%
  102. ^ "Other" with 10%; "Refused" with 0%; Undecided with 7%

Partisan clients

  1. ^ The Justice Collaborative Project is an affiliate of the Tides Centre, a liberal fiscal sponsorship provider
  2. ^ a b The American Greatness PAC, this poll's sponsor, is pro-Trump.
  3. ^ This poll's sponsor, Democrats for Education Reform, exclusively supports Democratic candidates.
  4. ^ a b Poll sponsored by the American Action Network, a conservative advocacy group.
  5. ^ Poll sponsored by the Defend Students Action Fund.
  6. ^ Poll sponsored by the Human Rights Campaign which has endorsed Biden prior to this poll's sampling period.
  7. ^ a b c Poll sponsored by the McSally campaign
  8. ^ Poll sponsored by AARP.
  9. ^ a b Heritage Action is the sister organization of the Heritage Foundation, which exclusively endorses Republican candidates
  10. ^ This poll's sponsor is the American Principles Project, a 501 that supports the Republican Party.
  11. ^ Polling was sponsored by OANN.
  12. ^ a b This poll's sponsor, 314 Action, had endorsed Kelly prior to the sampling period
  13. ^ Poll sponsored by the Defend Students Action Fund.

References

[edit]
  1. ^ "What happens next to John McCain's Senate seat". Politico. August 25, 2018. Retrieved August 26, 2018.
  2. ^ "Who could be appointed to replace John McCain in the Senate, and the process behind it, explained". Vox. Retrieved August 26, 2018.
  3. ^ Sanchez, Yvonne Wingett (December 14, 2018). "Jon Kyl will resign from the U.S. Senate on Dec. 31, setting up another appointment by Ducey to John McCain's seat". Arizona Republic. Retrieved December 14, 2018.
  4. ^ a b Sanchez, Yvonne Wingett; Hansen, Ronald J. (December 18, 2018). "Martha McSally will be appointed to John McCain's Senate seat". Arizona Republic. Retrieved December 18, 2018.
  5. ^ Sinema defeats McSally in Arizona Senate race – CNN Video, November 13, 2018, retrieved April 16, 2020
  6. ^ Amber Phillips (September 16, 2020), "The Senate seats most likely to flip in November", The Washington Post, archived from the original on September 16, 2020
  7. ^ "United States Senate special election in Arizona, 2020 (August 4 Democratic primary)". ballotpedia.org. Retrieved January 13, 2020.
  8. ^ "Our Campaigns – Container Detail Page". www.ourcampaigns.com.
  9. ^ a b Fedschun, Travis (September 4, 2018). "Jon Kyl named to succeed John McCain in the Senate". Fox News. Retrieved September 4, 2018.
  10. ^ Isenstadt, Alex. "Arizona Governor to Appoint Martha McSally to Senate". Politico. Retrieved November 18, 2018.
  11. ^ a b c d e f g "Who could be appointed to John McCain's Senate seat?". azcentral. August 24, 2018. Retrieved August 26, 2018.
  12. ^ Ethan Epstein (August 30, 2018). "She's Mavericky! What If Jan Brewer Took Over McCain's Senate Seat?". Weekly Standard. Archived from the original on August 30, 2018.
  13. ^ a b c d Conradis, Brandon (August 26, 2018). "Arizona governor faces pressure over McCain replacement". The Hill. Retrieved November 9, 2018.
  14. ^ "Meghan McCain would be a great Senate replacement for her father". Washington Examiner. August 27, 2018. Retrieved September 3, 2018.
  15. ^ Katie Reilly; Philip Elliott (August 26, 2018). "Here's What Happens to John McCain's Senate Seat". Time. Retrieved November 9, 2018.
  16. ^ Greenwood, Max (August 28, 2019). "McSally gets new primary challenger". The Hill.
  17. ^ Schor, Elana (November 13, 2018). "Kyl: No decision on how long to serve in Senate". Politico. Retrieved November 14, 2018.
  18. ^ KTAR.com, KTAR.com (March 26, 2019). "Martha McSally confirms 2020 Senate run, likely to face Democrat Mark Kelly". KTAR. Retrieved May 8, 2019.
  19. ^ a b c d e "2020 Official Candidates". azsos.gov.
  20. ^ Archer, Garrett (August 28, 2019). "Martha McSally picks up primary challenge from Daniel McCarthy". ABC 15. Retrieved August 28, 2019.
  21. ^ Giles, Ben (September 9, 2019). "U.S. Senate candidate sends racially-charged texts to business owner". Arizona Capitol Times. Retrieved May 15, 2020.
  22. ^ a b c "The Green Papers: 2020 General Election". The Green Papers. May 15, 2020. Retrieved May 15, 2020.
  23. ^ "PT Burton". Elect 535. Archived from the original on January 18, 2022. Retrieved May 15, 2020.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: unfit URL (link)
  24. ^ "Filing FEC-1381412". FEC. February 10, 2020. Retrieved May 15, 2020.
  25. ^ Bacon, Jake (July 9, 2019). "Former Flagstaff teacher Ann Griffin challenges Sen. McSally in Republican primary". Arizona Daily Sun. Retrieved July 12, 2019.
  26. ^ "Josue Larose for United States Senate 2020". FEC. April 29, 2020. Retrieved May 15, 2020.
  27. ^ Sullivan, Sean (December 13, 2018). "For Arizona governor, McSally's star dims as possible choice for Senate seat". The Washington Post. Retrieved December 14, 2018.
  28. ^ Dani Coble; Robert Angelen (October 17, 2018). "Arpaio sues New York Times, claims column damages 2020 Senate chances". The Arizona Republic. Retrieved November 9, 2018.
  29. ^ Duerig, Molly. "Joe Arpaio running for Maricopa County sheriff in 2020". azcentral. Retrieved August 26, 2019.
  30. ^ "Arizona Gov. Ducey promises to finish term, won't run for Senate in 2020". KTAR. December 3, 2018. Retrieved December 5, 2018.
  31. ^ Hansen, Richard J. (February 12, 2019). "With Mark Kelly in the Senate race, will other candidates jump in?". azcentral.com. Retrieved February 13, 2019.
  32. ^ "Jon Kyl appointed to take John McCain's Senate seat". CBS News. September 4, 2018.
  33. ^ Cleary, Tom (September 4, 2018). "How Long Will Jon Kyl Serve in the Senate in John McCain's Seat?". Heavy.com.
  34. ^ Wingett Sanchez, Yvonne (October 2, 2019). "Sen. Martha McSally may get another Republican primary challenger". Arizona Republic. Retrieved October 3, 2019.
  35. ^ "Martha McSally loses potential challenger with ties to Peter Thiel".
  36. ^ Molina, Daniel (August 13, 2019). "Curt Schilling flirts with 2020 congressional run in AZ". HardballTalk. Archived from the original on September 14, 2019. Retrieved August 13, 2019.
  37. ^ Forman, Carmen (October 3, 2018). "Fife Symington considering 2020 Senate run". The Arizona Capitol Times. Retrieved October 3, 2018.
  38. ^ "Former Arizona Gov. Symington Considering 2020 Senate Run". Arizona Public Media. Associated Press. October 5, 2018. Archived from the original on October 7, 2018. Retrieved October 6, 2018.
  39. ^ a b "George W. Bush to hold virtual fundraiser for Republican senators". The Washington Post.
  40. ^ a b Tal Axelrod (June 25, 2019). "Trump endorses McSally in Arizona Senate race". The Hill. Retrieved June 25, 2019.
  41. ^ a b "Gov. Ducey: I endorsed Sen. McSally when I appointed her and that endorsement stands". KNXV. August 29, 2019.
  42. ^ "Buzz Aldrin picks Arizona Republican McSally over fellow astronaut Kelly". Fox News. October 26, 2020.
  43. ^ a b "Endorsed Candidates | CWF".
  44. ^ a b PAC, Huck. "Candidates – Huck PAC". www.huckpac.com.
  45. ^ a b "2020 Candidates".
  46. ^ a b "RJC PAC". RJC PAC. Archived from the original on June 11, 2020. Retrieved August 20, 2020.
  47. ^ a b "Martha McSally". Archived from the original on August 11, 2020. Retrieved August 20, 2020.
  48. ^ a b c "State of Arizona Official Canvass – 2020 Primary Election" (PDF). Arizona Secretary of State. Archived from the original (PDF) on August 20, 2020. Retrieved September 11, 2020.
  49. ^ Stracqualursi, Veronica (February 12, 2019). "NASA astronaut Mark Kelly launches Senate campaign". CNN. Retrieved May 22, 2020.
  50. ^ a b Albanese Jr., Giovanni (July 15, 2019). "Mohammad Arif Running for U.S. Senate Seat from Arizona, Hopes to 'Make a Difference'". indiawest.com. Archived from the original on July 25, 2019. Retrieved July 25, 2019.
  51. ^ "Mohammad "Mike Obama" ARIF Candidate for U.S. Senate ARIZONA – 2020". Retrieved June 26, 2020.
  52. ^ "Sheila Bilyeu". Ballotpedia. Retrieved May 15, 2020.
  53. ^ "Juan Angel Vasquez (Arizona)". Ballotpedia. Retrieved May 15, 2020.
  54. ^ a b c "Rep. Ruben Gallego, averting primary bloodbath, won't run for the Senate". azcentral. Retrieved March 25, 2019.
  55. ^ Singiser, Steve. "Here's our ultimate Democratic wishlist for Senate in 2020. Who's on yours?". Daily Kos. Retrieved February 19, 2019.
  56. ^ Squires, Michael (February 8, 2019). "Grant Woods says he won't run for U.S. Senate in 2020". Arizona Republic. Retrieved February 8, 2019.
  57. ^ Wilkie, Christina (September 25, 2020). "Former President Barack Obama announces final 2020 candidate endorsements". CNBC. Retrieved December 25, 2020.
  58. ^ a b "Kamala Harris Endorsements". May 9, 2020.
  59. ^ a b Schneider, Elena (May 1, 2020). "Klobuchar launches Campaign to aid Senate, House Dems in 2020". Politico. Retrieved May 1, 2020.
  60. ^ "Sen. Sinema joins Senate battle, blasts Sen. McSally as willing to 'say anything to get elected'".
  61. ^ a b "Endorsed Candidates — 314actionfund". 314 Action. Archived from the original on April 4, 2020. Retrieved November 27, 2019.
  62. ^ a b Heyne, Christian (August 20, 2019). "Brady Endorses Mark Kelly for U.S. Senate". Brady.
  63. ^ a b "Coalition to Stop Gun Violence Endorses Gun Violence Survivors, Speaker Pelosi, Congressional Allies". Coalition to Stop Gun Violence. March 23, 2020. Archived from the original on June 11, 2020. Retrieved June 11, 2020.
  64. ^ a b "Mark Kelly for Senate (D-AZ)". Council for a Livable World.
  65. ^ a b "DSCC Endorses Mark Kelly in Arizona Senate Campaign". Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee. April 8, 2019. Retrieved October 16, 2019.
  66. ^ a b "End Citizens United Endorses Mark Kelly for U.S. Senate". End Citizens United. April 15, 2019. Retrieved June 20, 2019.
  67. ^ a b "Everytown for Gun Safety Action Fund Endorses Mark Kelly for U.S. Senate in Arizona". Everytown. June 9, 2020.
  68. ^ a b "2020 – Feminist Majority PAC". feministmajoritypac.org.
  69. ^ a b "HSDA 2020 — High School Democrats of America". Archived from the original on September 13, 2020. Retrieved August 27, 2020.
  70. ^ a b Acosta, Lucas (January 23, 2020). "HRC Announces Senate Endorsements in Effort to Achieve Pro-Equality Majority". Human Rights Campaign.
  71. ^ a b "Meet the 2020 Candidates". Joint Action Committee for Political Affairs.[permanent dead link]
  72. ^ a b "LCV Action Fund Endorses Mark Kelly for Senate". League of Conservation Voters. June 6, 2019. Retrieved June 20, 2019.
  73. ^ a b "NARAL Pro-Choice America Endorses Mark Kelly for U.S. Senate – NARAL Pro-Choice America". NARAL Pro-Choice America. July 15, 2019.
  74. ^ a b "2020 Federal Endorsements – NOW PAC". nowpac.org.
  75. ^ a b Axelrod, Tal (October 10, 2019). "Planned Parenthood issues first wave of 2020 House, Senate endorsements". The Hill. The endorsees include Senate hopeful Mark Kelly, a Democrat running to unseat Sen. Martha McSally (R) in Arizona,
  76. ^ a b "Sierra Club #ClimateVoter Guide: Endorsements". Sierra Club. March 19, 2021.
  77. ^ a b "Arizona 2020 Primary Election Candidates". Stonewall Democrats of Arizona.
  78. ^ a b "Candidates". VoteVets.org.
  79. ^ a b "The Green Papers: Arizona 2020 General Election". The Green Papers. May 7, 2020. Retrieved May 15, 2020.
  80. ^ "Arizona". Politics1. Retrieved May 23, 2020.
  81. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r "2020 General Election". Arizona Secretary of State. Retrieved September 26, 2020.
  82. ^ "Kay, Robert". FEC. Retrieved May 23, 2020.
  83. ^ "Statement of Interests Filed". Arizona Secretary of State. April 6, 2020. Archived from the original on April 11, 2020. Retrieved May 25, 2020.
  84. ^ "2020 Senate Race Ratings for October 29, 2020". The Cook Political Report. Retrieved March 11, 2021.
  85. ^ "2020 Senate Ratings". Senate Ratings. The Rothenberg Political Report. Retrieved March 11, 2021.
  86. ^ "2020 Senate race ratings". Sabato's Crystal Ball. Retrieved March 12, 2021.
  87. ^ "2020 Senate Race Ratings". Daily Kos Elections. Retrieved March 13, 2021.
  88. ^ "2020 Election Forecast". Politico. November 19, 2019.
  89. ^ "Battle for the Senate 2020". RCP. October 23, 2020.
  90. ^ "2020 Senate Elections Model". Decision Desk HQ. September 2, 2020. Retrieved September 2, 2020.
  91. ^ Silver, Nate (September 18, 2020). "Forecasting the race for the Senate". FiveThirtyEight. Retrieved September 18, 2020.
  92. ^ "Forecasting the US elections". The Economist. November 2, 2020. Retrieved March 13, 2021.
  93. ^ "Support Martha McSally". WinRed.
  94. ^ "Editorial: Election endorsements". October 19, 2020. Retrieved March 12, 2021.
  95. ^ Fordham, Evie (October 25, 2020). "Buzz Aldrin picks Arizona Republican McSally over fellow astronaut Kelly". Fox News. Retrieved October 25, 2020.
  96. ^ "Serve America PAC endorses six new federal candidates". Serve America PAC. March 11, 2020.
  97. ^ Obama, Barack (September 25, 2020). "Second Wave of 2020 Endorsements". Medium.
  98. ^ Yvonne Wingette Sanchez (October 3, 2020). "Sen. Sinema joins Senate battle, blasts Sen. McSally as willing to 'say anything to get elected'". The Arizona Republic. Retrieved October 6, 2020.
  99. ^ "2020 Endorsements". Retrieved August 18, 2024.
  100. ^ "Mark Kelly". Climate Hawks Vote.
  101. ^ "Voter Guide". Equality Arizona.
  102. ^ "Mark Kelly (D, AZ)". J Street PAC.
  103. ^ "Our Candidates". MoveOn.org.
  104. ^ "U.S. Senate – Education Votes". educationvotes.nea.org.
  105. ^ "NRDC Action Fund Endorses 14 for House, Senate". nrdcactionfund.org. September 3, 2020.
  106. ^ "Arizona – Official UAW Endorsements". uawendorsements.org. United Automobile Workers.
  107. ^ "2020 Star Opinion: Mark Kelly for U.S. Senate". Arizona Daily Star. October 7, 2020.
  108. ^ 270 to Win
  109. ^ Real Clear Politics
  110. ^ Ipsos/Reuters
  111. ^ Change Research/CNBC
  112. ^ NBC News/Marist
  113. ^ Swayable Archived November 13, 2020, at the Wayback Machine
  114. ^ Data for Progress
  115. ^ Emerson College
  116. ^ a b c Morning Consult
  117. ^ Data Orbital Archived November 21, 2020, at the Wayback Machine
  118. ^ Siena College/NYT Upshot
  119. ^ Grand Canyon Battleground Poll
  120. ^ CNN/SSRS Archived November 22, 2020, at the Wayback Machine
  121. ^ Pulse Opinion Research/Rasmussen Reports
  122. ^ Gravis Marketing
  123. ^ Ipsos/Reutuers
  124. ^ Swayable
  125. ^ Justice Collaborative Project (D) Archived November 30, 2020, at the Wayback Machine
  126. ^ OH Predictive Insights
  127. ^ Univision/University of Houston/Latino
    Decisions/North Star Opinion Research
  128. ^ Patinkin Research Strategies (D)
  129. ^ Y2 Analytics
  130. ^ Susquehanna Polling & Research Inc. (R)
  131. ^ Ipsos/Reuters
  132. ^ Pulse Opinion Research/Rasmussen Reports
  133. ^ Change Research/CNBC
  134. ^ RMG Research Archived October 22, 2020, at the Wayback Machine
  135. ^ Data Orbital Archived October 31, 2020, at the Wayback Machine
  136. ^ YouGov/CBS
  137. ^ Ipsos/Reuters
  138. ^ Monmouth University
  139. ^ Trafalgar Group
  140. ^ a b OH Predictive Insights
  141. ^ Ipsos/Reuters
  142. ^ Latino Decisions (D)
  143. ^ Basswood Research (R)
  144. ^ Data Orbital Archived October 21, 2020, at the Wayback Machine
  145. ^ HighGround Inc.
  146. ^ Change Research/CNBC
  147. ^ Siena College/NYT Upshot
  148. ^ a b Patinkin Research Strategies/Arizona Research Consortium (D)
  149. ^ Targoz Market Research
  150. ^ Morning Consult
  151. ^ Suffolk University
  152. ^ Susquehanna Polling & Research Inc. (R)
  153. ^ Data for Progress (D)
  154. ^ a b c d e f g Morning Consult
  155. ^ a b Data For Progress
  156. ^ Change Research/CNBC
  157. ^ ABC News/Washington Post
  158. ^ Morning Consult
  159. ^ Hart Research Associates (D) [permanent dead link]
  160. ^ Ipsos/Reuters
  161. ^ Morning Consult
  162. ^ Fabrizio, Lee & Associates (R)
  163. ^ Redfield & Wilton Strategies
  164. ^ Monmouth University
  165. ^ a b Siena College/NYT Upshot
  166. ^ Kaiser Family Foundation/Cook Political Report
  167. ^ Gravis Marketing
  168. ^ YouGov/CBS
  169. ^ OH Predictive Insights
  170. ^ Benenson Strategy Group/GS Strategy Group
  171. ^ Change Research/CNBC
  172. ^ Redfield & Wilton Strategies
  173. ^ FOX News
  174. ^ Basswood Research (R)
  175. ^ Redfield and Wilton Strategies
  176. ^ a b Emerson College
  177. ^ Change Research/CNBC
  178. ^ OH Predictive Insights
  179. ^ a b OnMessage Inc. (R)
  180. ^ Data for Progress
  181. ^ Change Research/CNBC
  182. ^ Morning Consult
  183. ^ CNN/SSRS
  184. ^ Redfield & Wilton Strategies
  185. ^ Public Policy Polling
  186. ^ NBC News/Marist
  187. ^ Spry Strategies (R)
  188. ^ Change Research/CNBC
  189. ^ CBS News/YouGov
  190. ^ OH Predictive Insights
  191. ^ Data Orbital
  192. ^ Gravis Marketing (R)
  193. ^ Change Research/CNBC
  194. ^ Global Strategy Group (D)
  195. ^ Change Research (D)
  196. ^ Redfield & Wilton Strategies
  197. ^ NYT Upshot/Siena College
  198. ^ Civiqs/Daily Kos
  199. ^ FOX News
  200. ^ HighGround Public Affairs Archived June 13, 2020, at the Wayback Machine
  201. ^ OH Predictive Insights
  202. ^ OH Predictive Insights
  203. ^ NBC News/Marist
  204. ^ Monmouth University
  205. ^ Univision/Arizona State University
  206. ^ OH Predictive Insights Archived September 16, 2020, at the Wayback Machine
  207. ^ Public Policy Polling
  208. ^ HighGround Public Affairs Archived February 19, 2020, at the Wayback Machine
  209. ^ a b Fabrizio, Lee & Associates (R)
  210. ^ Public Policy Polling
  211. ^ a b OH Predictive Insights
  212. ^ Emerson College
  213. ^ Change Research (D)
  214. ^ Bendixen & Amandi International
  215. ^ OH Predictive Insights
  216. ^ a b c Fabrizio Ward/AARP
  217. ^ OH Predictive Insights Archived May 13, 2019, at the Wayback Machine
  218. ^ a b OH Predictive Insights
  219. ^ Change Research
  220. ^ Public Policy Polling
  221. ^ Targoz Market Research/PollSmart
  222. ^ Climate Nexus
  223. ^ OH Predictive Insights Archived September 20, 2020, at the Wayback Machine
  224. ^ "State of Arizona – Official Canvass – 2020 General Election" (PDF). Arizona Secretary of State. Archived from the original (PDF) on December 31, 2020. Retrieved November 30, 2020.
  225. ^ "Arizona U.S. Senate Special Election Results". The New York Times. November 3, 2020. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved October 3, 2021.
  226. ^ "DRA 2020". Daves Redistricting. Retrieved August 18, 2024.

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]

Official campaign websites