Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Yorkshire/Bradford

Comments

I am just setting up the assessment list now. Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 14:21, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

The assessment system is now here. Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 14:55, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

Portal

As some may have noticed, I have created a portal for the Yorkshire project. I have the basic shell up, so if anyone wants to lend a hand, feel free. Cheers! Fl1942 14:09, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

New People

Ok, a number of people have now joined this, does anyone know how we want to go about this? I was thinking we could maybe work on Bradford and let it go from there? Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 21:49, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

Is this a child of WikiProject Yorkshire? Simply south 13:18, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

Does it matter? Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 14:39, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

Starting Work

Okay, I'm going to start sprucing up the articles on Bradford Uni. Any help would be appreciated. Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 10:56, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

Photographs

Got a digital camera? We need photos of almost everything! Many of the photos we have are copyvios - and commons always needs any excess anyway. It might be worth making a hit list of things we need. Secretlondon (talk) 16:30, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

Alas, I lost mine in Revolution on Halloween, so I cannot oblige. If anyone does have a camera and happens to be able to take photos of uni campus buildings, can you drop me a line? Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 13:16, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

I will try at some point when a) I get chance, b) am back in Bradford and c) most importanly actually remember my camera. I chanced upon the Manchester FAC and if you take a look at the Manchester article there's some cracking photos on there.

Anyone have a list of particularly important pictures? E.g. Media Museum, City Hall, Salts Mill, panoramic views of Bradford (which should be easy), Wool Exchange, Valley Parade, Odsal. Peanut4 (talk) 23:38, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

We should make a list of photos needed. User:Kaly99 has just uploaded Image:Bradford Interchange.jpg, Image:St George's Hall, Bradford.jpg and Image:Bradford_Alhambra.jpg. Yay! Anyone in Bradford for Xmas with a camera? Secretlondon (talk) 23:27, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

I have to say xmas in Bradford ain't the prettiest. As much as we need pictures, a bit of sunny delight will do Bradford prouder than the dank days we got at the moment. Particularly the Image:Bradford Interchange.jpg is looking decidely wintry and unwelcoming Peanut4 (talk) 00:54, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Talk page templates

Your project appears to have two different talk page templates, Template:BradProject and Template:WikiProject Bradford. Which one should be used? I would recommend using only one. --Jameboy (talk) 01:24, 5 December 2007 (UTC)#

The second one appears to have been created by someone who did not realise the first existed. We should probably keep the one that is transcluded onto most pages. Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 00:50, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

2nd one has some nice bits that could be merged in then redirect to the 1st one as WikiProject Bradford is a more standard name. --Nate1481( ^t/_c) 10:36, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Hello, and settlement guidelines

Hello WikiProject Bradford participants!

It's a pleasure to greet a new WikiProject I wasn't aware of! Just a note really that I've just applied some changes to Bradford per the WP:UKCITIES guidelines. It would be a great benefit if this project could adopt this guideline (extensively developed in partnership with WP:UKGEO and WP:CITIES) which serves to ensure a basic standard layout and content is used for articles about British settlements. Most of (well, all as far as I know) the local British Wikiprojects have already adopted this.

I hope this is well recieved! And best of luck with the project, -- Jza84 · (talk) 00:11, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

West Yorkshire cities issues

Hello again,

I've raised an issue at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Yorkshire#West_Yorkshire_cities_issues which concerns Bradford. I would be good if users could have a browse of it and make input where they feel necessary. Thanks, -- Jza84 · (talk) 16:10, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Valley Parade

I've put Valley Parade up for peer review with hopefully putting it up for FAC. I've had a couple of good comments, but if anyone else has anything to pitch in with, it's at Wikipedia:Peer review/Valley Parade/archive1 and all comments would be gratefully received. Peanut4 (talk) 21:32, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

I've archived the PR, and now put it forward to FAC, if anyone else wants to comment. Peanut4 (talk) 23:03, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Changes to the WP:1.0 assessment scheme

As you may have heard, we at the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial Team recently made some changes to the assessment scale, including the addition of a new level. The new description is available at WP:ASSESS.

• The new C-Class represents articles that are beyond the basic Start-Class, but which need additional references or cleanup to meet the standards for B-Class.
• The criteria for B-Class have been tightened up with the addition of a rubric, and are now more in line with the stricter standards already used at some projects.
• A-Class article reviews will now need more than one person, as described here.

Each WikiProject should already have a new C-Class category at Category:C-Class_articles. If your project elects not to use the new level, you can simply delete your WikiProject's C-Class category and clarify any amendments on your project's assessment/discussion pages. The bot is already finding and listing C-Class articles.

Please leave a message with us if you have any queries regarding the introduction of the revised scheme. This scheme should allow the team to start producing offline selections for your project and the wider community within the next year. Thanks for using the Wikipedia 1.0 scheme! For the 1.0 Editorial Team, §hepBot (Disable) 22:13, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia 0.7 articles have been selected for Bradford

Wikipedia 0.7 is a collection of English Wikipedia articles due to be released on DVD, and available for free download, later this year. The Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team has made an automated selection of articles for Version 0.7.

We would like to ask you to review the articles selected from this project. These were chosen from the articles with this project's talk page tag, based on the rated importance and quality. If there are any specific articles that should be removed, please let us know at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.7. You can also nominate additional articles for release, following the procedure at Wikipedia:Release Version Nominations.

A list of selected articles with cleanup tags, sorted by project, is available. The list is automatically updated each hour when it is loaded. Please try to fix any urgent problems in the selected articles. A team of copyeditors has agreed to help with copyediting requests, although you should try to fix simple issues on your own if possible.

We would also appreciate your help in identifying the version of each article that you think we should use, to help avoid vandalism or POV issues. These versions can be recorded at this project's subpage of User:SelectionBot/0.7. We are planning to release the selection for the holiday season, so we ask you to select the revisions before October 20. At that time, we will use an automatic process to identify which version of each article to release, if no version has been manually selected. Thanks! For the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial team, SelectionBot 22:58, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

Coordinators' working group

Hi! I'd like to draw your attention to the new WikiProject coordinators' working group, an effort to bring both official and unofficial WikiProject coordinators together so that the projects can more easily develop consensus and collaborate. This group has been created after discussion regarding possible changes to the A-Class review system, and that may be one of the first things discussed by interested coordinators.

All designated project coordinators are invited to join this working group. If your project hasn't formally designated any editors as coordinators, but you are someone who regularly deals with coordination tasks in the project, please feel free to join as well. — Delievered by §hepBot (Disable) on behalf of the WikiProject coordinators' working group at 04:59, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Article alerts

This is a notice to let you know about Article alerts, a fully-automated subscription-based news delivery system designed to notify WikiProjects and Taskforces when articles are entering Articles for deletion, Requests for comment, Peer review and other workflows (full list). The reports are updated on a daily basis, and provide brief summaries of what happened, with relevant links to discussion or results when possible. A certain degree of customization is available; WikiProjects and Taskforces can choose which workflows to include, have individual reports generated for each workflow, have deletion discussion transcluded on the reports, and so on. An example of a customized report can be found here.

If you are already subscribed to Article Alerts, it is now easier to report bugs and request new features. We are also in the process of implementing a "news system", which would let projects know about ongoing discussions on a wikipedia-wide level, and other things of interest. The developers also note that some subscribing WikiProjects and Taskforces use the display=none parameter, but forget to give a link to their alert page. Your alert page should be located at "Wikipedia:PROJECT-OR-TASKFORCE-HOMEPAGE/Article alerts". Questions and feedback should be left at Wikipedia talk:Article alerts.

Message sent by User:Addbot to all active wiki projects per request, Comments on the message and bot are welcome here.

Thanks. — Headbomb {^ταλκ_{κοντριβς} – WP Physics} 08:53, 15 March, 2009 (UTC)

GA Sweeps invitation

This message is being sent to WikiProjects with GAs under their scope. Since August 2007, WikiProject Good Articles has been participating in GA sweeps. The process helps to ensure that articles that have passed a nomination before that date meet the GA criteria. After nearly two years, the running total has just passed the 50% mark. In order to expediate the reviewing, several changes have been made to the process. A new worklist has been created, detailing which articles are left to review. Instead of reviewing by topic, editors can consider picking and choosing whichever articles they are interested in.

We are always looking for new members to assist with reviewing the remaining articles, and since this project has GAs under its scope, it would be beneficial if any of its members could review a few articles (perhaps your project's articles). Your project's members are likely to be more knowledgeable about your topic GAs then an outside reviewer. As a result, reviewing your project's articles would improve the quality of the review in ensuring that the article meets your project's concerns on sourcing, content, and guidelines. However, members can also review any other article in the worklist to ensure it meets the GA criteria.

If any members are interested, please visit the GA sweeps page for further details and instructions in initiating a review. If you'd like to join the process, please add your name to the running total page. In addition, for every member that reviews 100 articles from the worklist or has a significant impact on the process, s/he will get an award when they reach that threshold. With ~1,300 articles left to review, we would appreciate any editors that could contribute in helping to uphold the quality of GAs. If you have any questions about the process, reviewing, or need help with a particular article, please contact me or OhanaUnited and we'll be happy to help. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 22:38, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

WP 1.0 bot announcement

This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the WP 1.0 assessment system. On Saturday, January 23, 2010, the WP 1.0 bot will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's summary table will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the WP 1.0 project homepage. — Carl (CBM · talk) 03:02, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

Bradford articles have been selected for the Wikipedia 0.8 release

Version 0.8 is a collection of Wikipedia articles selected by the Wikipedia 1.0 team for offline release on USB key, DVD and mobile phone. Articles were selected based on their assessed importance and quality, then article versions (revisionIDs) were chosen for trustworthiness (freedom from vandalism) using an adaptation of the WikiTrust algorithm.

We would like to ask you to review the Bradford articles and revisionIDs we have chosen. Selected articles are marked with a diamond symbol (♦) to the right of each article, and this symbol links to the selected version of each article. If you believe we have included or excluded articles inappropriately, please contact us at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8 with the details. You may wish to look at your WikiProject's articles with cleanup tags and try to improve any that need work; if you do, please give us the new revisionID at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8. We would like to complete this consultation period by midnight UTC on Monday, October 11th.

We have greatly streamlined the process since the Version 0.7 release, so we aim to have the collection ready for distribution by the end of October, 2010. As a result, we are planning to distribute the collection much more widely, while continuing to work with groups such as One Laptop per Child and Wikipedia for Schools to extend the reach of Wikipedia worldwide. Please help us, with your WikiProject's feedback!

For the Wikipedia 1.0 editorial team, SelectionBot 22:07, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

Article alerts

Wikipedia:WikiProject Bradford/Article alerts has been created; generating Article alerts for this WikiProject. Timrollpickering (talk) 20:13, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

Anyone around?

Anyone still around on this project? Say hi if you are. Would like to get this reactivated again. Peaky76 (talk) 21:29, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Please help get the Bradford area ready for the start of the Wiki Loves Monuments competition on 1st September

This September the UK is taking part for the first time in the international photography competition Wiki Loves Monuments. Participants will be invited to submit pictures of listed buildings of significant importance (grades I or grade II*), as recorded by English Heritage. The main external website for competitors can be found here, and you can leave a message there if you have queries about competing. Do please join in, and let people in your local area know of this excellent way in which both existing and new Wiki users can help improve the encyclopaedia by contributing photographs of local listed structures. What about organizing a local Wikimeet to attract new people?

In preparation for the start of the competition on 1st September there is still quite a lot of work to do, and we would like to ask for the help of members of this wikiproject. Your local and expert knowledge will be invaluable in ensuring that the lists of eligible buildings are up to date and correctly formatted. If you look at Listed buildings in the United Kingdom you will see how many structures are included. If you then follow the link to Listed buildings in England, you can get to the detailed lists for your area. Alternatively have a look at the WLM planning table. Can you help to ensure that the lists for your area are up to date and well presented?

Some of the lists have been semi-automatically generated from data provided by English Heritage. These use pre formatted templates (eg EH header) which will make it much easier for competition participants to upload their photographs to Commons as an automated process. Please don't change the template structure, as we need to ensure that the templates are properly compatible with the WLM standards that are in use worldwide. The format will allow a bot automatically to collect the information and to put it into the international Monuments Database.

The data still needs the attention of local editors:

• The "title" may need wikilinking to a suitable article name (whether we currently have that article or not). If there are several buildings in one street all of the wikilinks point at an article about the street; however each entry has a separate line in the list.
• The "location" column looks and sorts better if just the parish or town is included (& wikilinked).
• The "date completed" column sometimes has eg "C19" for 19th century, and "C1850" for c. 1850 when the date is uncertain - these need to be corrected manually.
• The "grid ref & lat & long" (which is occasionally missing) may be given to 8 characters — only 6 (grid ref) or 5 (lat & long) are really needed.
• Clicking on the "list entry number" should take you to the data sheet for that entry on the English Heritage database which can be checked if needed for details.
• The image column should have a picture added if we already have a suitable image on Commons. (N.B. if you are going to be taking photos yourself for inclusion in the competition don't upload them until September)
• References may be added according to normal WP practice.

For further information, please see Commons:Wiki Loves Monuments 2013 in the United Kingdom.

If you have any queries, please post them not below but on the Organizers' help page on Commons.

Anything you can do to help improve these lists will be much appreciated. The final deadline for cleaning up is 31st August.

--MichaelMaggs (talk) 14:42, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Merge inactive WikiProject as a taskforce of WP:YORKSHIRE

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was moved as requested. The objection doesn't state any reason in policy that would overcome the support. bd2412 T 18:12, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Bradford → Wikipedia:WikiProject Yorkshire/Bradford – this project is tagged as inactive since 2009, so it should be merged as a task force into a larger, active, wikiproject, such as WP:YORKSHIRE. Other options include NB/WPP UK and WPUKGEO as the parent project. Per discussion at WPLEEDS, it seems WPYORKSHIRE is the better choice, if not that, then WPUK, as Bradford articles are not all strictly geography articles. This also seems to be rather necessary, considering the request for activity notification for September 2013. 76.65.128.222 (talk) 11:55, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Survey

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.

• Support; seems like a practical solution to me. bobrayner (talk) 12:44, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
• Support, per my comments at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Leeds. --Redrose64 (talk) 14:04, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Discussion

Any additional comments:

Examples of merged wikiproject banners abound, such as for {{WPAUSTRALIA}}, {{WPUSA}}, {{WPCANADA}} which feature taskforces, workgroups and subprojects on the same banner, with city projects listed as subelements of the larger regional project. -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 11:55, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Comment rather pointless to actually merge into Wikiproject Yorkshire as it already covers all of the articles covered by this project. Actually as I maintain Wikiproject Yorkshire to have sub-project would make it far less manageable. Leave it as it is without sub-projects. Keith D (talk)

That would be the reason to merge it into WP:YORKSHIRE, because it already covers all of the articles. Otherwise, we'd merge it to WP:UK (or WP:ENGLAND) as a task force. -- 70.24.244.158 (talk) 05:49, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

As I said I maintain WP:YORKS and would not wish to have task forces to make maintenance more difficult. Keith D (talk) 10:48, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

How does this make maintenance more difficult? Nothing changes to the WPYORKSHIRE maintenance. -- 70.24.244.158 (talk) 06:43, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Request for information on WP1.0 web tool

Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.

We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:25, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

The Great Britain/Ireland Destubathon

Hi. The Wikipedia:The Great Britain/Ireland Destubathon is planned for March 2020, a contest/editathon to eliminate as many stubs as possible from all 134 counties. Amazon vouchers/book prizes are planned for most articles destubbed from England, Wales, Scotland and Ireland and Northern Ireland and whoever destubs articles from the most counties out of the 134. Sign up on page if interested in participating, we have over 44,000 stubs! A good opportunity to improve stubs for your area!♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:18, 4 February 2020 (UTC)