Wikipedia talk:Ultraviolet/2023/February
This is an archive of past discussions about Wikipedia:Ultraviolet. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
AIV reports don't use bold formatting
Ultraviolet seems to apply bold formatting to AIV reports, which is rather undesirable and not the usual way these reports are formatted. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:25, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- Looking into this right now... Chlod (UV • say hi!) 05:07, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
- @ToBeFree: Fixed! It may take some time for the fix to take effect as users get the new version of the script. Chlod (UV • say hi!) 05:42, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for the quick fix! :) ~ ToBeFree (talk) 06:41, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
- @ToBeFree: Fixed! It may take some time for the fix to take effect as users get the new version of the script. Chlod (UV • say hi!) 05:42, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Ultraviolet on mobile site
I started to noticed today that on the mobile site ([1]), Ultraviolet is now enabled there. However, the z-index inside #uvPageIcons > div
is causing the icons to be rendered above any content such as notification's offcanvas menu, user menu dropdown, viewing talkpage section, adding new discussion, and source editor. While, it's now enabled on mobile site, it doesn't work on diff pages, and the warning user modal isn't resized to fit the mobile screen nor are end-user able to manually scroll horizontal/vertical to navigate the menu, I understand these are still work in progress hence some features are not available yet but that's alright. However, please resolve the z-index asap, thanks a lot. — 🍊 Paper9oll 🍊 (🔔 • 📝) 14:27, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
- Any updates on this? I believe is related to T328610. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 15:08, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Paper9oll: Apologies for the late response, I didn't get a notification for this thread. This seems to be a regression; Ultraviolet should be disabled on Minerva while we work on support, but this doesn't seem to be the case. I'll have this fixed right now. Chlod (UV • say hi!) 15:15, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
- This should be (somewhat) fixed now; Ultraviolet shouldn't be running on Minerva anymore. We'll investigate possible ways to get Ultraviolet on Minerva in the future, this is a planned feature. Chlod (UV • say hi!) 15:22, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Chlod Thanks, it's fixed now. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 15:34, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
- This should be (somewhat) fixed now; Ultraviolet shouldn't be running on Minerva anymore. We'll investigate possible ways to get Ultraviolet on Minerva in the future, this is a planned feature. Chlod (UV • say hi!) 15:22, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Paper9oll: Apologies for the late response, I didn't get a notification for this thread. This seems to be a regression; Ultraviolet should be disabled on Minerva while we work on support, but this doesn't seem to be the case. I'll have this fixed right now. Chlod (UV • say hi!) 15:15, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Minor edits tagging for rollback-like on vandalism
I’m pretty sure vandalism reverts should be marked as minor. However, my rollback-like reverts with redwarn don’t get marked as minor. Is there a way to fix this? Aaron Liu (talk) 17:13, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Aaron Liu, from Wikipedia talk:Ultraviolet/2020/September#"Minor edits":
RedWarn's pseudo-rollback ... are not marked as minor, however, since they are normal edits and not rollbacks
— Qwerfjkltalk 18:17, 8 February 2023 (UTC)- Making reverts as minor isn’t only limited to rollback though.
If you see vandalism on a list of changes (such as your watchlist), then revert it immediately. You may use the "undo" button (and the automatic edit summary it generates), and mark the change as minor.
Aaron Liu (talk) 18:36, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
- Making reverts as minor isn’t only limited to rollback though.