Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Trains
| This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Trains and anything related to its purposes and tasks. |
|
 | This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
 | WikiProject Trains was featured in a WikiProject Report in the Signpost on 20 September 2010. |
|
|
TWP discussion archives: |
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. | |
Qingdao–Jinan, China - four articles
[edit]Greetings, in my wanderings around Wikipedia, I came across Qingdao–Jinan through train. While searching for sources, I found these additional articles (which I added into See also section):
- Qingdao–Jinan high-speed railway – a faster parallel high-speed railway
- Qingdao–Jinan passenger railway
- Qingdao–Jinan Railway – the older "conventional" railway running along the Jiaoji passenger railway
Since I am not familiar with the topic, I am asking for help here. Wondering if any duplication, and if so maybe combine articles? Regards, JoeNMLC (talk) 20:38, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- The 3 railways are different railways, built at different times, on somewhat different routes. I can't see any advantage in combining them. The passenger service is another matter and not very useful in its current form.--Grahame (talk) 01:52, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
Reliable source?
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Mackensen - Thanks very much for the helpful response two above. Can I now ask a related question on sourcing. I'm aware of an earlier discussion on Railscot which suggested it should be used as an External link but not as a source. I think that was your suggestion. Has any similar discussion taken place on this site, Disused Stations? It looks both comprehensive and well-researched. But I think it remains a user-created blog, without the editorial oversight one would expect in a Reliable source. So, usable as a source or not? Again, much appreciate your time. KJP1 (talk) 11:17, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- I'm aware of two, both somewhat cursory:
- I haven't looked into its reliability myself as I don't do much with UK articles. I would post a notice on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK Railways to ensure that the folks there are aware of this question. Mackensen (talk) 12:04, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Delhi Metro
[edit]Delhi Metro has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 02:17, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Bangkok BTS stations move request
[edit]See Talk:Ari BTS station#Requested move 31 January 2025. --Paul_012 (talk) 07:49, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:CRRNJ Newark Bay Bridge#Requested move 23 December 2024
[edit]
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:CRRNJ Newark Bay Bridge#Requested move 23 December 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. TiggerJay (talk) 16:09, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Ari BTS station#Requested move 31 January 2025
[edit]There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Ari BTS station#Requested move 31 January 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ASUKITE 14:43, 8 February 2025 (UTC)
Can I ask, on my mac book, the images have truncated, obscured the citations, is this happening for other users on here?? Govvy (talk) 18:02, 12 February 2025 (UTC)
- Yes. There are too many images on the article for the amount of prose, there is also a MOS:SANDWICH issue in the reference section. I'll start a discussion on the article talk page about which images we should use. Thryduulf (talk) 18:16, 12 February 2025 (UTC)