Wikipedia talk:Dispute resolution noticeboard/request

This is not the Dispute resolution Noticeboard

This is just the talk page of a sub page of the dispute resolution notice board and may not be monitored. To file a new case, visit : This page instead.

Archives

1

This page has archives. Sections older than 700 days may be automatically archived by when more than 4 sections are present.

Where Does One Find Information on the Status and a List of Past and Open Dispute Requests?

Where does one find definitive information on the status and list/archive of their past, closed and open dispute requests? Essentially, the title says it all. This is asking a generic community relevant question, which may have been answered elsewhere but a preliminary search on Wikipedia and on search engines do not give a concise and complete definitive answer. MMmpds (talk) 23:41, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

MENTIONING VEDAS AS A SOURCE IN BAIDYA ARTICLE

Hello Mediator, I have been forced to come here on the advise of Arnold Reinhold Sir due to the strange activities of User Ekdalian. I want to state the VEDAS as a source of Baidya Caste position. As you might be knowing, VEDAS are the highest authority in Hinduism. VEDAS are considered the Divine Truth. But Ekdalian is threatening me with Account Block, and also stating that Vedas and Puranas cannot be mentioned as source, but amusingly "TAMPERED PURANAS" are clearly mentioned as source in the present Baidya article. I AM REALLY SHOCKED AND SADDENED TO SEE SUCH INSULT OF VEDAS.

So I request the Mediator to help me in the cause of stating VEDAS as a source in this article.

Anirban Kolkata Anirban Kolkata (talk) 07:51, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I can provide Govt. of India website where the views of Sayanacharya establishing Vaidyas as Brahmin is clearly there from Vedic shlokas. Sayanacharya is that ancient Indian Vedic scholar who has been followed by all modern Western Vedic scholars like HH Wilson. Is that reliable, verifiable source ? Anirban Kolkata (talk) 10:49, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

https://vedicheritage.gov.in/flipbook/Rigveda_Shakala_SayanBhasya_Vol_IV/#book/761 Anirban Kolkata (talk) 13:40, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above link is the Govt of India website link. Anirban Kolkata (talk) 14:04, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Full citation of my source evidence where Vaidya has been mentioned as Brahmin by Sayanacarya :

Sontakke,N.S. Rigveda-Samhita with the Commentary of Sayanacarya. T.N. Dharmadhikari Publisher, 1983, p. 759-760. Anirban Kolkata (talk) 14:10, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please see the notice at the top of this page. Requests for dispute resolution are not accepted from this talk page. — TransporterMan (TALK) 19:48, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sir, Can I go to any other place for Dispute Resolution? This is the first time I have come for Dispute Resolution, so I don't have much idea. Thankyou. Anirban Kolkata (talk) 11:56, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Anirban Kolkata, it is clearly mentioned at the top of this talk page. Thanks! Ekdalian (talk) 13:06, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Question about sequence of dispute resolution

G'day, I would like to know about the DR protocol sequence. We have long term disput with lots of discussions in TP so I prepared DRN request upon agreement to come here, but we never formally went through any methods that precede DRN - we didn't request for third opinion, and we didn't request for comment. My my question is, first, can we skip these procedures that precede the DRN, is that OK even, and second, if we fail here, can we go back and request for a comment, etc. ౪ Santa ౪^99° 09:54, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Request for help

Hi everyone,

I’m writing to ask for your help as a neutral third party regarding an issue with my account. The admin, The Squirrel conspiracy, has accused me of promoting Randa Kassis’ page, and I wanted to clarify my position because I think this might be a misunderstanding.

When I first started contributing to Wikipedia, I focused on French articles and topics like football players. Over time, my interests shifted towards politics in Syria, and I made edits here and there to various pages. I’ll admit that I’ve contributed more to Randa Kassis’ page, as well as pages for the Astana Platform and Fabien Baussart, mainly because I was interested in their initiatives, like the Astana process in 2015 and the Constitutional Committee in 2017.

That said, I want to be clear: I didn’t create the pages for Randa Kassis or Fabien Baussart. The Randa Kassis page was actually created by someone from the anti-vandalism team, not me.

I was really surprised when the admin deleted the Astana Platform and Movement for a Pluralistic Society pages. I never intended to break any Wikipedia policies, and I genuinely believe this has all been a misunderstanding.

I hope this helps clarify things, and I’d be really grateful if you could help me resolve this issue. Thank you so much for your time and support. Ecrivain Wagner (talk) 14:10, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]