Wikipedia:Wiki Ed/Temple University/Syntax (Spring 2016)
| This Course
|
Wikipedia Resources
|
Connect
Questions? Ask us:
contact |
 | This course page is an automatically-updated version of the main course page at dashboard.wikiedu.org. Please do not edit this page directly; any changes will be overwritten the next time the main course page gets updated. |
- Course name
- Syntax
- Institution
- Temple University
- Instructor
- Jodi Reich
- Wikipedia Expert
- Adam (Wiki Ed)
- Subject
- syntax
- Course dates
- 2016-01-11 – 2016-04-27
- Approximate number of student editors
- 20
| Student | Assigned | Reviewing |
|---|---|---|
| Longacre w | ||
| Wskollar | ||
| JanetLauyeung | ||
| Tuf75463 | ||
| Tuf80688 | Generative grammar, Minimalist program, Universal grammar, X bar theory | |
| Lauriesara | Syntax |
Timeline
Week 1
- Course meetings
-
- Monday, 4 April 2016 | Wednesday, 6 April 2016 | Friday, 8 April 2016
- In class - Wikipedia essentials
- Overview of the course
- Introduction to how Wikipedia will be used in the course
- Understanding Wikipedia as a community, we'll discuss its expectations and etiquette.
Handout: Editing Wikipedia
- Assignment - Learn the basics
- Begin the training modules assigned for your course. During this training, you will make edits in a sandbox and learn the basic rules of Wikipedia.
Week 2
- Course meetings
-
- Monday, 11 April 2016 | Wednesday, 13 April 2016 | Friday, 15 April 2016
- Assignment - Critique an article
- Review pages 4-7 of the Evaluating Wikipedia brochure. This will give you a good, brief overview of what to look for in other articles, and what other people will look for in your own.
- Evaluate an existing Wikipedia article related to the class, and leave suggestions for improving it on the article's talk page.
- A few questions to consider (don't feel limited to these):
- Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference?
- Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
- Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
- Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
- Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
- Check a few citations. Do the links work? Is there any close paraphrasing or plagiarism in the article?
- Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
Resources: Evaluating Wikipedia, Using Talk Pages
Week 3
- Course meetings
-
- Monday, 18 April 2016 | Wednesday, 20 April 2016 | Friday, 22 April 2016
- Assignment - Copyedit an article
- Choose one article, identify ways in which you can improve and correct its language and grammar, and make the appropriate changes. (You do not need to alter the article's content.)