Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Recruitment Centre/Recruiter Central/Archives/Sssssss340
Status: In progress
Date Started: 3 January 2014
Date Ended:
Recruiter: Royroydeb
Step One
[edit]You first go through WP:Good article criteria and WP:What the Good article criteria are not , then I will proceed.RRD13 (talk) 07:22, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
I have read the two pages sssssss340 05:09, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
Step Two
[edit]Now, I will be taking a quiz. You need to score at 80% to pass.
- What does "broad in coverage means" ?
- Can an article be failed only because it is not well illustrated?
- What do you mean by "original research" ?
- When we can strip off an article of its GA position?
- Suppose in an article (regarding a person), vital information which defames the person is missing.Can that article be a GA?If not why?
- What does "stable" mean?RRD13 (talk) 08:35, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
Here are my answers:
- A article is broad in coverage if it only provides the necessary information, no more, no less
- No, illustrations are not required if there are none readily available. However, illustrations can greatly improve most articles and should be added if there are illustrations readily available.
- Research not verifiable by a reliable published source
- At any point at which it no longer represents the level of quality that is expected of a good article.
- No, the article must provide all information to maintain a neutral stance.
- There should not be a active Editing War or content dispute, however vandalism, proposals, and copy edits are not qualifiers for instability.
sssssss340 02:47, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
- Ok! Its correct.
- Yes!
- Yes!
- Partially true. It is when someone seeks a reassesment of the article or the article becomes a Featured Article.
- Very Good!
- Correct
You have given 5 correct answers so you percentage is 84%. Congratulations! You have passed the test.
Step Three
[edit]Now how we can continue is entirely upto you. Firstly I would like to ask you if you have any doubts in anywhere, then you are welcomed to ask me. After that take a nomination at here and I will supervise how you do. RRD13 (talk) 04:24, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
I have taken the nomination at http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/SAS_(software) sssssss340 12:53, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
- Once you keep put on your reviews, User:sssssss340, keep the article on hold for 7 days. If nothing satisfactory occurs during the time period then prematurely fail the article. RRD13 (talk) 04:27, 21 January 2014 (UTC)