Help desk
< March 17	<< Feb \| March \| Apr >>	March 19 >

Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.

March 18

02:24:27, 18 March 2015 review of submission by Sokolo11

Sokolo11 (talk · contribs)
- User:Sokolo11/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I received this message: "Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Basis function instead."

However, I submitted from my sandbox page and assumed that I was indeed editing the Basis function page. I am trying to understand why it is appearing as if I am trying to create a new page instead of editing the Basis page like I intend. Sokolo11 (talk) 02:24, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Sokolo11: The Basis function article was created in 2002, long before you started editing your draft in your sandbox. Instead of creating a new page, you can either directly edit Basis function using the "Edit" tab in the upper right of the page or you can propose changes at Talk:Basis function. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 17:03, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

02:25:30, 18 March 2015 review of submission by QUSRAAFCAF

QUSRAAFCAF (talk · contribs)
- No draft specified!

QUSRAAFCAF (talk) 02:25, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

qusraafcaf page has been reedited with references. REviewer is on leave. I need help in getting pictures I uploaded using commons to my page but can't find them again. files qus 1 to qus 10. can u help?

@QUSRAAFCAF: You don't have to wait for the original reviewer to return. If you want someone else to review your draft, you just need to paste {{subst:submit}} at the top of your page and save it.

You can find a list of files you've uploaded to commons at http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3AListFiles&user=QUSRAAFCAF&ilshowall=1 --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 17:13, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

14:33:42, 18 March 2015 review of submission by Lalehfarrah

Lalehfarrah (talk · contribs)
- User talk:DataSphere Technologies (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I don't understand why this was denied specifically. I rewrote this once and references many externals sources. Can you please provide some specifics about what is wrong with it? The denial said it reads like an advertisement, but I don't agree with that at all. I'm not sure how to change it so it doesnt. I've looked at all the companies like ours and they follow this exact same format and are approved. Please help me understand how to fix this. Thank you!! Lalehfarrah (talk) 14:33, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Lalehfarrah: You have not shown that DataSphere Technologies meets the standards of WP:CORP. You would need to add citations to significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject of the article. List or directory entries on Deloitte or crunchbase are not considered significant coverage, and neither are coverage of routine transaction announcements. Reprints of press releases are not considered independent. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 17:19, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

23:58:47, 18 March 2015 review of submission by Mlserio

Mlserio (talk · contribs)

I am trying to submit this for review, but it is not submitting. I've been working on this for a year and adding more references.----

Mlserio (talk) 23:58, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Mlserio:

Done I have submitted Draft:Elizabeth Dougherty for review on your behalf. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 01:37, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]