Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2023 January 24

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Infobox region symbols. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:13, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Infobox U.S. state symbols with Template:Infobox region symbols.
Template:Infobox region symbols accomplishes much of the same job, but can be embedded in other infobox templates. The global template has 1195 transclusions in the article space, the U.S. specific one has 51. The fields that Template:Infobox U.S. state symbols offers that Template:Infobox region symbols would be missing are Amphibian, Cactus, Cat, Crustacean, Dog, Domestic animal, Horse, Marsupial, Mushroom, Pet, Reptile, Dinosaur, Firearm, Poem, Shell, Ship, Slogan, Soil, and Tartan. The first 12 of those I envision states using the existing "animal" or "plant" fields with a bulleted list in a Template:Plainlist wrapper and parentheses if necessary. The other seven I feel could be added to Template:Infobox region symbols without too much fuss, I envision modeling the U.S. additions after the India-specific additions.

I think we can also take the opportunity to leave behind the U.S. state quarters. They were interesting in the early aughts, but I don't think they will continue to be symbols of the states in decades to come, the way a flag or anthem are likely to be. One idea Template:Infobox region symbols might take from Template:Infobox U.S. state symbols is the divide between living and inanimate insignia. This merger was actually suggested by Frietjes in August 2020 in an ultimately unsuccessful merge proposal with Template:Infobox settlement.-- Patrick Neil, oѺ/Talk 20:54, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Merge, but oppose getting rid of the state quarters because of WP:NTEMP (once notable, always notable) Atavoidturk (talk) 14:50, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:02, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Unnecessary. 2001:8003:913E:5D01:E459:423D:A45E:2DDF (talk) 05:33, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Atavoidturk. Thrakkx (talk) 15:47, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2023 February 1. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:12, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:12, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, documentation, categories, or incoming links. Created in 2016. – Jonesey95 (talk) 20:22, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:11, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template without content and not in use. Pelmeen10 (talk) 18:11, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Currently empty, but could be expanded with info from [1] and [2]. This section w:MC Saïda § Current squad is also not helpful because it, too, is empty. BhamBoi (talk) 06:03, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:11, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Replaced by Module:Adjacent stations/Bangladesh Railways. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:15, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:49, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

unused after being merged with the parent article with attribution. Frietjes (talk) 16:22, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:49, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

unused after being merged with the parent article with attribution. Frietjes (talk) 16:22, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:49, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

unused after being merged with the parent article with attribution. Frietjes (talk) 16:22, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:48, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

unused after being merged with the parent article with attribution. Frietjes (talk) 16:22, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:11, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Serves no purpose - none of the articles listed are "about" Cain to any particular extent, and are or can be wikilinked in the article ITBF (talk) 13:28, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:25, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

1952 Summer Olympics field hockey game reference templates

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:47, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Former single use templates which have been substed in Field hockey at the 1952 Summer Olympics with attribution. No longer needed, content can be reused in other articles using WP:LST if necessary. ಮಲ್ನಾಡಾಚ್ ಕೊಂಕ್ಣೊ (talk) 06:48, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Module:Adjacent stations/Iarnród Éireann. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:09, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:IERail start with Module:Adjacent stations/Iarnród Éireann.
This template is used for the previous style of handling adjacent stations information. This template is only the head of the table, which should be replaced with Template:Adjacent stations, while the content of the table itself should use Module:Adjacent stations/Iarnród Éireann. Gonnym (talk) 04:54, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:16, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Single-use templates. Subst and delete. Izno (talk) 04:06, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).