Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 August 31

< August 30	September 1 >

August 31

Template:Aviation accidents and incidents in Australia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 September 9. Primefac (talk) 14:06, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Aviation_accidents_and_incidents_in_Australia (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Current Rajya Sabha from Bihar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:17, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Current Rajya Sabha from Bihar (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused and out-of-date Frietjes (talk) 23:19, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, I find it not good and not important for wikipedia. AlfaRocket (talk) 15:06, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox pageant titleholder

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 September 9. Primefac (talk) 14:09, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox_pageant_titleholder (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Infobox_model (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:LaffayetteCountyAR-NRHP-stub

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G6 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:LaffayetteCountyAR-NRHP-stub (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:LaffayetteCountyAR-NRHP-stub is a mis-spelled duplicate of Template:LafayetteCountyAR-NRHP-stub. According to PetScan, the mis-spelled template is applied to 0 stubs. Please note, there is no category associated with this stub template. Furicorn (talk) 10:56, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No need for TfD. Speedy delete as simple housekeeping. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:51, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I think this is not too much relevant in wikipedia.AlfaRocket (talk) 13:48, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The heck with this. Speedy delete as WP:CSD#T3 or WP:CSD#G7, I don't care, see Template talk:LaffayetteCountyAR-NRHP-stub#Page mis-spelled. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 20:25, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox fashion designer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Infobox person. After going through a few dozen pages that call {{infobox fashion designer}} there were too many that used both |known_for= and |label_name=, so I will add the latter into IB person and will redirect afterwards. Primefac (talk) 14:44, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox fashion designer (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Infobox person (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Infobox fashion designer with Template:Infobox person.
per WP:INFOCOL and MOS:IB. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 08:04, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

From a cursory glance, it seems that the only parameter unique to the designer infobox is |label_name= Is that so? If it is, simply use |known_for= in Infobox person and simply delete the other. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:50, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, only one param is different. I would suggest a redirect. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 21:10, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I would think we could make a version of {{infobox medical details}} for this situation. or, just move the information to the "known_for" and redirect. Frietjes (talk) 00:20, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Regardless, Delete Infobox fashion designer. It is starting to look like that template is useless. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 01:57, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I think this is not too much relevant in wikipedia, I agree with user Mr Guye!.AlfaRocket (talk) 15:08, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Merge. Chicbyaccident (talk) 19:07, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. One parameter is different. Just use 'known for'. ^{My name is}not^dave (talk/contribs) 08:53, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:GFW NEX*GEN Championship

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) f e minist 06:29, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:GFW NEX*GEN Championship (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The main article (GFW NEX*GEN Championship) was deleted and redirected to a different article via Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of current champions in Global Force Wrestling last year. There are few champions listed and the championship itself isn't notable enough to serve as a useful navigation tool.LM2000 (talk) 04:54, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Only 3 champions and the title looks like retired --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 15:27, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support!. AlfaRocket (talk) 11:14, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2025 ASEAN Para Games

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. No prejudice against recreation, provided we're somewhat closer (i.e. not seven years away) to the Games themselves. Primefac (talk) 14:35, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2025 ASEAN Para Games (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Fails WP:EXISTING. The existing links are fail WP:BIDIRECTIONAL. Paul_012 (talk) 03:45, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. It's just too soon for this subject to have a "series" box. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 02:33, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
unused, I find it not good and not important for wikipedia.AlfaRocket (talk) 15:09, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Bids for the 2025 Southeast Asian Games

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 14:59, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Bids for the 2025 Southeast Asian Games (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Fails WP:EXISTING. Paul_012 (talk) 03:44, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).