Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 December 28
December 28
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:50, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
Every link in this template redirects back to the same article after individual articles were deleted or redirected as they lack content. YuMaNuMa Contrib 16:50, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
- Delete since the individual articles were deleted (for some reason). --Odie5533 (talk) 14:50, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:50, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
Not used in any pages, no blue links. C679 14:33, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
- Delete - not useful. Mentoz86 (talk) 13:32, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
- Delete appears to be a useless template, and is not functioning as a navigational box. --Odie5533 (talk) 14:51, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
- Delete CSD:T3. — WylieCoyote 15:25, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:51, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
Not used in any pages, no blue links. C679 14:33, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
- Delete - not useful. Mentoz86 (talk) 13:32, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
- Delete CSD:T3. — WylieCoyote 15:25, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:52, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
- Template:Kbd (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Unused — Gadget850 (Ed) talk 01:51, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
- Keep I thought about this one a while. Initially, it looks redundant to using {{code}} or
<code>...</code>
, but it's actually a wrapper to its own tag:<kbd>...</kbd>
. {{code}} is meant for source code, and shouldn't be used for keyboard input—{{kbd}} should. It's not used right now, but it definitely seems useful. Mozilla docs, w3c wiki, w3c spec. --Odie5533 (talk) 15:04, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
- Keep Seems to be a part of Template:Track listing#Parameters, which is used in almost every WP:ALBUMS article. Dan56 (talk) 17:13, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
- It's only used in the docs for {{Track listing}}, not the template itself. --Odie5533 (talk) 17:32, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
- Keep – "Unused" is not reason enough to delete. Senator2029 leave me a message 01:00, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
- Keep per Odie5533 -- 70.24.248.246 (talk) 06:29, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.