Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2011 July 27

< July 26	July 28 >

July 27

Template:Pretty Hate Machine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 07:43, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Pretty Hate Machine (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unneeded duplication of {{Nine Inch Nails}}. I Help, When I Can.^[12] 22:18, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment What about all the other Nine Inch Nails album templates? If this one is nominated, I don't see the reason for the others to be kept.Curb Chain (talk) 07:43, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- All of them meet CSD criteria, these templates are the only CSD's that had trouble going through. I Help, When I Can.^[12] 11:04, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Clearly redundant to the more comprehensive NIN template. --RL0919 (talk) 13:00, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Single albums don't need their own templates. The band template is sufficient. – Muboshgu (talk) 14:17, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The KEM Template. Will that template be speedily deleted too (I undid a revision by User:Cowik at Template:The Fragile, possible vandalism)? Txiиg$ Tx/-\t VV!ll +8I+E 22:58, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- You, the creator, cannot remove the template, but someone else can. That's when they come to here. I Help, When I Can.^[12] 23:39, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unnecessary duplication of {{Nine Inch Nails}}Curb Chain (talk) 08:17, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:The Frustrators

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 07:44, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:The Frustrators (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Navbox included on only one article and that contains links only to related articles but nothing related to the band itself. Works more like a see also section than a artist's navbox. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 19:34, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Public spaces

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Courcelles 23:01, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Public spaces (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template, for public spaces, would be huge if it actually included all places like this around the world, and it would not be functional. A comment on the talk page from 2010 also says the same point, that the template would be unwieldy if it really included all public spaces. It isn't used for very many places, so maybe deleting it is the best solution. Aslbsl (talk) 19:22, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The template's inclusion criteria is too broad, and such, unfeasible.Curb Chain (talk) 07:37, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This is quite obviously hopelessly overreaching given its current scope, and completely useless in its current form (as it doesn't have enough links to document the "public spaces" in my home town right now, let alone the entire planet). Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) - talk 13:35, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per nom, impossibly broad in scope, and essentially useless. – ukexpat (talk) 20:20, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I made this but it was clearly a bad idea because we will never agree on the "most notable" public spaces. (Heroeswithmetaphors) talk 18:38, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Cc-by-2.0-map

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:09, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cc-by-2.0-map (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Hardly used, replace all current uses with {{Cc-by-2.0}}. This doesn't even categorizes the files it is used on differently, so it is completely redundant to the more "generic" template. –Drilnoth (T/C) 16:10, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Cc-by-2.0-map-of

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 08:02, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cc-by-2.0-map-of (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Used on 8 files, where it can be replaced by {{Cc-by-2.0}} with the extra info where it should be, in the description of the image. –Drilnoth (T/C) 16:08, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox NASCAR crew chief

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 07:46, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox NASCAR crew chief (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Delete and use {{Infobox NASCAR driver}} which can be renamed to {{Infobox NASCAR biography}} exactly as we did with many other infoboxes in the past. Both infoboxes use the same parameters. Magioladitis (talk) 13:31, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect: What about redirecting {{Infobox NASCAR crew chief}} to {{Infobox NASCAR biography}}? -- Nascar1996^{(Talk • Contribs)} 15:48, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am OK with that. -- Magioladitis (talk) 01:24, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, replace with {{Infobox sportsperson}}? The driver template should stay separate in my opinion, and do not move to NASCAR biography. -- Nascar1996^{(Talk • Contribs)} 04:42, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Most of the crew stuff people have statistics similar to those pages transcluding Infobox NASCAR driver. If the problem is not to mix the transclusions we can just create the NASCAR biography with 2 redirects (driver and crew stuff) with instructions not to bypass the redirect. Usually categorisation through transclusion is avoided. -- Magioladitis (talk) 07:52, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Such as? -- Nascar1996^{(Talk • Contribs)} 13:20, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I mean we could create the "biography" one as the main with 2 redirects (driver and crew stuff( like we have {{Infobox officeholder}} and redirect to it. Do you think we need to do this? -- Magioladitis (talk) 10:44, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject NASCAR has had a discussion about whether or not we use the driver infobox for the crew chief. We agreed on using sportsperson (only about two people actually comment on the page. So really I believe just deletion is necessary, but keep the drivers infobox as drivers. -- Nascar1996^{(Talk • Contribs)} 13:43, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with the deletion then. It was my initial proposal anyway. -- Magioladitis (talk) 08:19, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rename {{Infobox NASCAR driver}} to {{Infobox NASCAR biography}}; I agree with Magioladitis' statements. Txiиg$ Tx/-\t VV!ll +8I+E 03:51, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Merge {{Infobox NASCAR driver}} and {{Infobox NASCAR crew chief}} to {{Infobox NASCAR biography}}. Changed my fucking mind. Txiиg$ Tx/-\t VV!ll +8I+E 04:28, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well both actions will have the sane result anyway and in fact there is not thing that crew stuff has that driver doesn't. -- Magioladitis (talk) 07:40, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge per nom. Royal broil 11:53, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment the whole process is pointless now. Nascar1996 was being bold and orphaned the infobox. Delete is just fine now. -- Magioladitis (talk) 22:07, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Uw-hangon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Courcelles 22:59, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Uw-hangon (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No foreseeable use of this template with the new csd templates. Marcus Qwertyus 03:42, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: This template is used in 0 pages. Txiиg$ Tx/-\t VV!ll +8I+E 23:09, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The fact that the template is unused is irrelevant: the template is intended to be substituted. But this user warning is obsolete, and no longer needed. — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:27, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Shake It Up

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Speedy deleted. Re-creation of a template already discussed and deleted: see Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2011_May_18#Template:Shake_It_Up. JamesBWatson (talk) 20:29, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Shake It Up (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Small template with only 3 articles, all linked through the main one. Wikipedia:NENAN. --LoЯd ۞pεth 01:53, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: The main article's the only article related to SIU. Txiиg$ Tx/-\t VV!ll +8I+E 03:49, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Nihongo sound

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 07:46, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Nihongo sound (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template was only used as Kenpachi Zaraki, which was probably a proof of concept test. But it's probably much easier and less confusing to stick {{Audio}} into the fourth parameter of {{Nihongo}}. —Farix (t | c) 00:32, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Foreign-language mess almost never used at all times. A\/\₉3r-(0la 16:29, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Nihongo4

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete, now replaced by {{Nihongo2|日本|help=yes}} Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:04, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Nihongo4 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Another unused version of {{Nihongo}}. —Farix (t | c) 00:12, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As author, I would say conditional delete (in which case it would likely have qualified for WP:CSD#T3) -- if {{Nihongo2|日本|help=yes}} is fixed to display 日本^? as opposed to 日本. G.A.S ^talk 09:10, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Nihongo/lit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 07:46, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Nihongo/lit (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

I'm not sure if this was ever used in {{Nihongo}}, but it is not being used now. —Farix (t | c) 00:01, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Foriegn-language unused template of garbage. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anger-Cola (talk • contribs) 16:28, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.