Jump to content

Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Newsroom

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Signpost
WP:POST/N
Newsroom


Welcome to the central hub of The Signpost!

This is The Signpost Newsroom, a place where The Signpost team can coordinate with writers, both regular and occasional, and people who have suggestions for topics to cover. See the boxes below if you have suggestions (something for the team to write about in regular columns), proposal/submissions (for articles you want to write/have written yourself), or want to create a pre-formatted draft article in your userspace, with helpful links and easy-to-edit syntax. Discussion occurs both here and in the Signpost Discord.


Discussion of upcoming issues is done at the newsroom talk page. For general feedback on The Signpost as a whole, go to our talk page. To learn more about The Signpost, see our about page.

The Signpost currently has 5644 articles, 706 issues, and 13767 pages (4503 talk and 9264 non-talk).

Links:

Suggest a topic

To suggest a topic to be covered by The Signpost, simply click on the button below or post to our suggestions page manually. Example of good topics are

  • Editors who have done something extraordinary/wonderful
  • Ongoing discussions
  • Media coverage of Wikipedia
  • Technical news
  • Updates to important tools and templates
  • Wikipedia-related events

but many more exist.


Email a private tip to the EiC
Propose/submit an article

If you have an idea for an article you would like to write, you can submit it for review by the editorial team. You can do so by clicking the button below or by posting to our submissions page manually.

  • News articles should be kept relatively neutral and report on a specific piece of actual news. They can be on any topic of interest to Wikipedians, from general events, to technical news.
  • Opinion pieces are evaluate on originality, relevance to Wikipedians, and the quality of the arguments. They should provoke thought and encourage productive discussion.
  • Special pieces cover things that don't fall neatly in the above two categories. If it's interesting to you, it's likely interesting to someone else as well. Check with us and we'll see what can be done!

Create a draft

To create a draft of an article in your userspace, simply copy-paste {{subst:Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Templates/Story-preload}} at Special:MyPage/Signpost draft (replacing USERNAME with your own username).

You can also use the button below. This will preload a form, which you can then save and edit. We recommend saving without making any edits to the preloaded form before starting to write your article.



Calendar: current deadline is highlighted, and current UTC date is 2025-02-03 22:38:56.
January 2025
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
30 31 01 02 03 04 05
06 07 08 09 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 01 02
February 2025
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
27 28 29 30 31 01 02
03 04 05 06 07 08 09
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 01 02
March 2025
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
24 25 26 27 28 01 02
03 04 05 06 07 08 09
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31 01 02 03 04 05 06

Article status

[edit]

Below here is an automatically generated master list of every page whose title starts with Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Next issue/. It's automatically generated by SDZeroBot every day. Also consult the mockup page for the next issue to make sure all of their titles, images and blurbs are correct.

You should click the button to manually update it and make sure it's current before doing anything serious.

Note: There are also a bunch of things in /Drafts and /Next next issue. When prepping an issue, make sure that articles in this expand-o-box are accounted for.

Sometimes titles will get messed up -- anything between here and the next horizontal line has a title error and needs to be fixed.

End of parseable title errors


Also, these categories (Purge):

Ready for copyedit Copyedit done Final approval Cat #
no no no Signpost drafts, not ready for copyedit 43
yes no no Signpost drafts, ready for copyedit 8
yes yes no Signpost drafts, ready for final check 3
yes yes yes Signpost drafts, ready for publication 1

From the editor

Not started ·
Content guidance + resources


Arbitration report

In progress · 3,582b
last edited 2025-02-02 18:58:41 by PrinceTortoise
Content guidance + resources

Checklist

  • Green checkmarkY Headline
  • Green checkmarkY Subheading
  • Blue question mark? Ready for copyedit
  • Red X symbolN Copyedit done
  • Red X symbolN Final approval by editor-in-chief
No talk page section · click here to open one


Comix

Not started ·
Content guidance + resources


Cobwebs

Not started ·
Content guidance + resources


Disinformation report

Not started ·
Content guidance + resources


Discussion report

Not started ·
Content guidance + resources


Not started ·
Content guidance + resources


Not started ·
Content guidance + resources


From the archives

Not started ·
Content guidance + resources


Next from the archives

Not started ·
Content guidance + resources


Not started ·
Content guidance + resources


Humour

Not started ·
Content guidance + resources


Essay

Not started ·
Content guidance + resources


Concept

Not started ·
Content guidance + resources


Crossword

Not started ·
Content guidance + resources


In the media

In progress · 14,939b
last edited 2025-02-03 22:38:01 by Smallbones
Content guidance + resources

Checklist

  • Green checkmarkY Headline
  • Red X symbolN Subheading
  • Blue question mark? Ready for copyedit
  • Red X symbolN Copyedit done
  • Red X symbolN Final approval by editor-in-chief
Discussion

A Newsweek piece, published today, says they "contacted Wikipedia" for a response. Anybody have any idea what or who the author thinks they contacted? ☆ Bri (talk) 20:14, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Newsweek has been a bit flakey for awhile. The "Wikipedia hits back" in the headline might be a bit of this and a bit of that, e.g. edited articles, Jimbo's response on x on the 21st (I first thought it was recycled from Dickipedia days), but any response from the WMF should have been mentioned. I take it as a non-response. IMHO WMF should not respond to questions about a non-response - they'd let Newsweek do that. Smallbones(smalltalk) 19:33, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
In other news, I'm trying to submit a short and sweet blurb about John Green and AFC Wimbledon by the deadline (it will all make sense, I promise). If I'll have enough time, I'll also help you sort out the mess over at the first lead story... Oltrepier (talk) 21:46, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Bri @Smallbones Right, my John Green blurb is (belatedly) in!
I'll try to help you deal with the other lead stories and the short blurbs as much as I can in the next few days, although I've still got such a hectic study schedule in real-life... Oltrepier (talk) 20:47, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Oltrepier: I think this story is fantastic. Smallbones(smalltalk)

I'd like to withdraw the "Roman salute" story and resubmit it as an Op-ed. I was just storing the most relevant sources and ideas in what I intended to be a short factual blurb, but the story just hasn't turned out that way. The world exploded over that story over the last 11 days. I should be able to get the Op-ed posted tonight. I'd think that putting a 2 paragraph blurb just before the In briefs with a link to the Op-ed would work well. Smallbones(smalltalk) 18:04, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Smallbones That's totally fine, let me know if you need some help reviewing it! Oltrepier (talk) 19:35, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I've edited down the Musk part of the article, in an attempt to remove my part of the submission (as proposed above - sorry if I've made a mess of it). I just don't think I should both write an op-ed and cover what the news media said about it. I've removed much of what I recognized as my work (hopefully the irrelevant part), and didn't mean to remove others' parts. Please just rewrite as you wish, maybe cut it down a bit. Definitely there should be an answer to the title's question (See NY Times) or change the title and the pic. Smallbones(smalltalk) 16:13, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Bri, Oltrepier, and Josve05a: I'm just trying to make sure that everybody understands that I don't think I should participate in writing up the Musk part of Itm. Smallbones(smalltalk) 18:46, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not a problem. I've done a bit more editing and am happy with the way it stands now. ☆ Bri (talk) 21:46, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

News and notes

In progress · 4,281b
last edited 2025-02-03 04:28:24 by Bri
Content guidance + resources

Checklist

  • Red X symbolN Headline
  • Red X symbolN Subheading
  • Blue question mark? Ready for copyedit
  • Red X symbolN Copyedit done
  • Red X symbolN Final approval by editor-in-chief
No talk page section · click here to open one


News from Diff

Not started ·
Content guidance + resources


Obituary

Not started ·
Content guidance + resources


Op-ed

In progress · 14,606b
last edited 2025-02-03 19:55:16 by Smallbones
Content guidance + resources

Checklist

  • Green checkmarkY Headline
  • Green checkmarkY Subheading
  • Blue question mark? Ready for copyedit
  • Red X symbolN Copyedit done
  • Red X symbolN Final approval by editor-in-chief
No talk page section · click here to open one


Opinion

In progress · 8,176b
last edited 2025-02-03 19:55:05 by Oltrepier
Content guidance + resources

Checklist

  • Green checkmarkY Headline
  • Green checkmarkY Subheading
  • Red X symbolN Ready for copyedit
  • Red X symbolN Copyedit done
  • Red X symbolN Final approval by editor-in-chief
No talk page section · click here to open one


Recent research

In progress · 2,392b
last edited 2025-02-03 05:41:02 by HaeB
Content guidance + resources

Checklist

  • Red X symbolN Headline
  • Red X symbolN Subheading
  • Red X symbolN Ready for copyedit
  • Red X symbolN Copyedit done
  • Red X symbolN Final approval by editor-in-chief
Discussion

As usual, we are preparing this regular survey on recent academic research about Wikipedia, doubling as the Wikimedia Research Newsletter (now entering its fifteenth volume). Help is welcome to review or summarize the many interesting items listed here, as are suggestions of other new research papers that haven't been covered yet. Regards, HaeB (talk) 05:45, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Serendipity

Not started ·
Content guidance + resources


Technology report

Not started ·
Content guidance + resources


Tips and tricks

Not started ·
Content guidance + resources


Traffic report

In progress · 28,124b
last edited 2025-02-03 21:34:45 by Bri
Content guidance + resources

Checklist

  • Green checkmarkY Headline
  • Green checkmarkY Subheading
  • Blue question mark? Ready for copyedit
  • Red X symbolN Copyedit done
  • Red X symbolN Final approval by editor-in-chief
Discussion

The phrase "the Sargodha airbase attack of Pakistan" is ambiguous and needs to be corrected. No criticism of the TOP25 folks who probably got the text from the lede of the film's article. Since the airbase is in Pakistan, and based on the plot summary, I think it was an Indian Air Force strike on the Pakistani airbase. Maybe someone who can figure out the actual history can help? ☆ Bri (talk) 15:03, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject report

Not started ·
Content guidance + resources


Community view

In progress · 10,102b
last edited 2025-02-03 13:28:20 by Wil540 art
Content guidance + resources

Checklist

  • Green checkmarkY Headline
  • Green checkmarkY Subheading
  • Blue question mark? Ready for copyedit
  • Red X symbolN Copyedit done
  • Red X symbolN Final approval by editor-in-chief
No talk page section · click here to open one


Forum

Not started ·
Content guidance + resources


In focus

Not started ·
Content guidance + resources


Special report

Not started ·
Content guidance + resources


Interview

Not started ·
Content guidance + resources


This table is generated by querying the database replica and is periodically updated by a bot.
Edits made within the table area will be removed on the next update!

Op-ed

In progress · 14,606b
last edited 2025-02-03 19:55:16 by Smallbones
Content guidance + resources

Checklist

  • Green checkmarkY Headline
  • Green checkmarkY Subheading
  • Blue question mark? Ready for copyedit
  • Red X symbolN Copyedit done
  • Red X symbolN Final approval by editor-in-chief
No talk page section · click here to open one




∑ 1 items  | Query runtime: 0.03 s | Last updated: 21:25, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

End of auto-generated report.