Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/HourlyNerd

HourlyNerd

The filing party (the editor who opened this request) will add the basic details for this dispute below.

Editors involved in this dispute

1. GorleyWiki (talk · contribs) – filing party
2. discospinster (talk · contribs)
3. GorleyWiki (talk · contribs)

Articles affected by this dispute

HourlyNerd

Other attempts at resolving this dispute that you have attempted

{{{links}}}

Issues to be mediated

What is this dispute about? What sections, sentences, or issues in the article(s) can you not agree on? If you are the editor who opened this request, list these issues to be mediated under "Primary issues". If you did not open this request, you can add additional issues to be mediated under "Additional issues". The issues to be mediated would be properly agreed upon later, if this request for mediation is accepted.

Primary issues (added by the filing party)

1. Can this startup article be a page on wikipedia considering other high-profile, funded startups have been denied from Wikipedia? What is the objective threshold?

Additional issues (added by other parties)

• Additional issue 1
• Additional issue 2

Parties' agreement to mediation

If you are a named party, please sign below and indicate whether you agree or refuse to participate in mediation. Remember that all editors are obliged to resolve disputes about content through discussion, mediation, or other similar means. If you do not wish to participate in mediation, you must arrange another form of dispute resolution. Comments and questions should be made underneath the numbered list below, to avoid confusion.

1. Agree. GorleyWiki (talk) 15:53, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Decision of the Mediation Committee

This section should only be edited by a mediator. The Mediation Committee's representative will indicate in due course whether the request is accepted (meaning a mediator will be assigned) or rejected (meaning you will have to try a different type of dispute resolution). If the mediator asks you a question in this section, you may edit here.

• Recommend refusal: Multiple reasons: First, failure to satisfy prerequisite for mediation #4: "The parties must have first engaged in extensive discussion of the matter in dispute at the article talk page and discussion only through edit summaries will not suffice," second, wrong venue, deletion matters should be addressed at Articles for Deletion. — TransporterMan (TALK) 19:41, 29 September 2014 (UTC) (Committee member) PS: If the filing editor just wants some advice or some questions answered, rather than dispute resolution, he should try Editor Assistance. — TM
• Reject: For the reasons I have stated in my recommendation, above. For the Mediation Committee. — TransporterMan (TALK) 16:31, 1 October 2014 (UTC)