Wikipedia:Portal peer review/Archive/April 2009
Appearance
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
I've never worked on a portal before, but I have created this one over the last few days. Here are what it features-
NineFourteen selected pictures (all featured on Commons or a Wikipedia project) with a procedure in place to nominate more- Eleven selected articles (all good or featured here) while there are a few fungi articles heading there as we speak
Thirty-nineForty-eight selected species (all of did you know quality) while there are plenty more that could be added at any time- I will add some more when I get around to it- A did you know section that will be updated whenever new fungi articles are featured on the main did you know section (a few a week- 24 so far this year)
- Various links that can be updated as appropriate, but do not really need monitoring.
I am happy to maintain the portal, and a few other members of the WikiProject have already said that they think it looks good. Basically, I am looking for reccomendations of what is needed to take it up to featured portal status, as well as how I can "advertise" it- what's the etiquette here? Where and how do I link to it? Thanks. J Milburn (talk) 18:43, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
- My review can be found at User talk:J Milburn#Portal:Fungi OhanaUnitedTalk page 17:15, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.