Wikipedia:Peer review/Nickel Creek/archive1
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because it is a recent good article, and I would like to eventually get it to FA status. Any comments or suggestions are greatly appreciated.
Thanks, Thamusemeantfan (talk) 03:23, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
dihydrogen monoxide
[edit]- Lead should really be in a few paragraphs. Look at Powderfinger, Silverchair, etc. for a general model
- It's really not sorted very well at the moment...
- You don't need refs in the infobox
- Refs that use web.archive should have this noted (using |archivedate= in cite web, etc.)
- Early days: 1989–1999 section is also a bit jumbled up...
- No more info on the first 2 albums?
- Copyvio issues with that much quoting
- "Critics responded favorably to the album, with All Music Guide giving it four and a half stars out of five." - don't use (plural) critics if you only cite one, and get a ref for that one
- Is it possible to photoshop the date/time off the bottom right corner of Image:NickelCreek.jpg?
- "Charles Spano of All Music Guide said that" - any non-AMG reviews?
- A few short paras in the This Side: 2002–2004 section could be merged
- "Sean Watkins stated that all three members were ready" - refer to him by surname, and no need to wlink
- I will unlink it, but I can not just use the surname because Sara Watkins is also a member of the band. --Thamusemeantfan (talk) 00:57, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
- "planned the Farewell (For Now) Tour" - tours don't go in italics (a few others in the article...)
Still needs a bit of work before FAC. Gimme a yell when you're done with this and I'll try to take another look if I get the chance. Cheers, dihydrogen monoxide (H2O) 07:47, 17 March 2008 (UTC)