Wikipedia:Peer review/History of South Carolina/archive1
Appearance
This was a featured article candidate, but it lost out, though it has met many, maybe all, of the objections on that list since it was first put on there. It's much too soon to resubmit it, so before I do, I'd like to know what can still be done to improve this article. Toothpaste 20:44, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
- The civil war is not covered properly. The "US" Navy, do we mean the Norths or Soulths navy? Aside form this no problem to prevent a FAC IMHO. --Cool Cat My Talk 18:44, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
- I thought that was obvious, since the South had seceded from the U.S., causing the U.S. navy to be practically synonymous with the North's navy. Nevertheless, I'm changing "U.S. Navy" to "North's Navy" but piping the text to U.S. Navy. Toothpaste 18:53, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
- North's Navy' sounds clumsy to me. Rob Church Talk | Desk 23:08, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
- I thought that was obvious, since the South had seceded from the U.S., causing the U.S. navy to be practically synonymous with the North's navy. Nevertheless, I'm changing "U.S. Navy" to "North's Navy" but piping the text to U.S. Navy. Toothpaste 18:53, 26 July 2005 (UTC)