Wikipedia:Peer review/Fox hunting/archive1
I've listed this article for peer review because I have been working hard to bring it up to meet all of WP's quality standards, which is difficult with such a divisive subject, with strong biases and POV in both directions.
I would like input on how this article could be further improved, as I feel it would be a real achievement to get an article like this to FA status.
Thanks,
Owain.davies (talk) 18:30, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
- Re: Photographs. It is surprising to me that the choice of photographs for this article, even in the sections addressing cruelty, do not give the slightest indication that foxes might suffer. MikeHobday (talk) 20:25, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
- I would just point out that this has been discussed on the article talk page, predominantly initiated by this user. The consensus of users was that it did not add encyclopaedic value. Owain.davies (talk) 21:05, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
- And that over-rides any discussion from more experienced editors here? I certainly lost the vote on the article's talk page, but I'm not sure that's how featured articles are drawn up. MikeHobday (talk) 21:16, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
- I would just point out that this has been discussed on the article talk page, predominantly initiated by this user. The consensus of users was that it did not add encyclopaedic value. Owain.davies (talk) 21:05, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
- A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style. If you would find such a review helpful, please click here. Thanks, APR t 20:17, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
- Started to address points listed. MikeHobday (talk) 21:51, 25 November 2007 (UTC)