Wikipedia:Peer review/Billy (Black Christmas)/archive2
| Toolbox |
|---|
I've listed this article for peer review because... It has been three years since its last peer review and I have made significant changes in the past two months. This article is already at Good Article status and I'm interested in promoting it to Featured Article status. A focus on its prose and any potential issues with citations (how they are cited etc.).
Thanks, Paleface Jack (talk) 02:08, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
BP!
[edit]- The third paragraph in the legacy section is repetitive, and it looks like it just lists rankings/listicles/polls. Perhaps merge it into one sentence if you can or avoid the list stuff?
- I will see what I can do about that.--Paleface Jack (talk) 19:00, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- remove " PublishersWeekly.com" at ref 10?
- Is it a questionable or unreliable source?--Paleface Jack (talk) 19:00, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- What makes Dread Central reliable?
- As per WP Horror's Sources, it is listed as reliable and has been included in many a FA.--Paleface Jack (talk) 19:00, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- ref 105 website isn't italicized
- Made a mistake citing it, fixed to reflect that it is a "news" rather than a "web" source.--Paleface Jack (talk) 19:00, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- fix ref 26
- fix 73 as it redirects me to dead page instead of the archived ones.
- Marked the original link as dead.--Paleface Jack (talk) 19:00, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Link Bloody Disgusting and Collider.
- italicize film titles in the citation titles per MOS:CONFORMTITLE, for ex. Black Christmas.
- Per most of FAC nominations, all the sources at the further reading section should be implemented and/or remove the irrelevant ones. 🍕BP!🍕 (🔔) 06:32, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Will work on that later today.--Paleface Jack (talk) 19:00, 31 December 2024 (UTC)