Help desk
< October 5	<< Sep \| October \| Nov >>	October 7 >

Welcome to the Wikipedia Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.

October 6

Amendments on the title "Sa Sa International Holdings"

To whom it may concern:

I am the representative of Sa Sa International Holdings. As there are some updates on our company which unsynchronized with the description in the Wikipedia. Enclosed please find the latest information for your further handling.

About Sa Sa

Sa Sa, a leading beauty product retailing group in Asia, runs one-stop cosmetics specialty stores selling diverse quality products ranging from skincare, fragrance, make-up, hair care, body care products, as well as health and beauty supplements under more than 700 brands, including over 180 own brands and other exclusive international brands. Sa Sa operates around 230 retail stores in the Hong Kong and Macau SARs, Mainland China and Malaysia, as well as provides customers with convenient shopping experience across multiple online platforms.

The Group has been included in the Hang Seng Composite SmallCap Index, FTSE World Index Series and, MSCI Index Series. It has been a constituent member of Hang Seng Corporate Sustainability Benchmark Index since 2011.

Thankyou for your kind attention.

Best regards, Jackie — Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.3.54.94 (talk) 02:24, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Courtesy link: Sa Sa International Holdings --2606:A000:1126:28D:A1E6:61A0:871C:7F43 (talk) 02:38, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please submit an edit request at the article's talk page and provide a reliable, independent source. —Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 03:10, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And please note that there is no chance of promotional language such as you have posted above being accepted. Wikipedia does not permit promotion of any kind;. Wikipedia's article about you is not a place for you to tell the world about yourself: it should be a summary of what people who have no connection with your company have chosen to publish about your company. --ColinFine (talk) 11:29, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image not showing properly

I tried to upload a new version of File:Super Mario Bros 35.png, specifically found here [1], but it is not showing up properly. How do I fix this? (Oinkers42) (talk) 02:34, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Seems fine to me, Oinkers42. Perhaps you just had to wait for a cached version of a page to be updated. --ColinFine (talk) 11:32, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Repinging (Oinkers42). --ColinFine (talk) 11:33, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Having two non-free images to illustrate an article

I'm currently working on the article Cheshire Crossing. This is a comic originally illustrated by one artist, then re-illustrated by another. The article talks a lot about how the original art was terrible, and how a new illustrator was brought in on an updated version.

Currently, the article has one non-free image, the cover of the new version. I want to also have, somewhere in the article, a cover from the original run, to allow a reader to see the art that is talked about so much. However, from what I can gather, cover art can only be used as a non-free image can only be used if it "will be shown as a primary means of visual identification at the top of the article dedicated to the work in question." I'm presuming there can't be two "primary means of visual identification". Does this mean I can only have one non-free cover? Could I make one image which combines the two? What are my options? HenryCrun15 (talk) 02:41, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@HenryCrun15: My reading of WP:NFCC item 3a is that you can have more than one, if one is not enough to convey the needed info. RudolfRed (talk) 03:31, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) @HenryCrun15: This is not the simple "use the cover once" case. There is another free-use rationale that applies here. You can use a copyrighted work under under the free use doctrine if the work itself is being discussed, and not merely being used to illustrate a publication as we do with the cover. Your problem will be navigating our minefield of restrictions to justify applying this doctrine. Please document your argument for using the work, both in in the file description and in the article's talk page. -Arch dude (talk) 03:41, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Question about comma usage

I'm uncertain about what to do in a sentence with a phrasing like "... and because of [event], [result] occurred." Could anyone please tell me if the comma should be there? Could anyone also please tell me if the tense of the verb, in this case "occurred", matters in regards to comma usage?--Thylacine24 (talk) 02:44, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The comma can be there. I personally wouldn't use this phrasing for encyclopedic writing, but it is correct grammar. —Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 03:08, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Tenryuu: Okay, thanks. I won't, then. Could you please tell me if you think I should remove the comma in any sentences where it occurs in this fashion?--Thylacine24 (talk) 12:07, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'd reformat the sentences rather than just deciding if the comma should stay or not. —Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 23:56, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Tenryuu. Note in particular that unless the sources specifically say that Y occured because of X, the statement "because of X, Y occurred" is original research. --ColinFine (talk) 11:36, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@ColinFine: Thanks, but I'm not talking about the factuality behind such statements, just the grammar of them. (Sorry to phrase that sentence rudely.)--Thylacine24 (talk) 12:07, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Thylacine24: In my experience, unless you're rewriting your own work, or doing a substantial rewrite anyway, some (especially the original writer) might regard editing of optional commas (i.e., those without a bright-line reason to be or not) as annoying or even disruptive if done in volume. Editing commas required (or more rarely, not) by the MoS or standard grammar, or necessary to resolve ambiguity, are, of course, OK. —[AlanM1 (talk)]— 01:00, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@AlanM1: Could you please tell me if the MOS covers the type of comma usage I've brought up here? Skimming through that section, I don't think it does, though the examples involving Burke and Wills may. (I ignored the "serial comma" section, which I don't think has anything to do with what I'm talking about; sorry.)--Thylacine24 (talk) 01:14, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Thylacine24: That would be beyond the scope of the MoS (as well as my knowledge). Unless someone else wants to make a strong case one way or the other, it's up to you. Comma might have something useful. If you ask at WT:MOS, they'll probably tell you it's a grammar question, but might point you to the right place to discuss it, which I can't seem to find. Maybe ask at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Grammar if you must, though it's pretty quiet. —[AlanM1 (talk)]— 01:40, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@AlanM1: Thanks, I'll look into it.--Thylacine24 (talk) 01:59, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Facism

How is it you can approve an edit saying facism is alt right? It’s on all sides of the political spectrum. Nice work.... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1014:B100:FB36:C55D:2F80:E569:64ED (talk) 03:07, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please review the discussions at Talk:Fascism. -Arch dude (talk) 03:46, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

De-clutter talk pages

There was a consensus that allowed removing talk pages notices by bots such as [2] to de-clutter the talk page. Now I can't find that discussion. Link, please! Thanks (please also ping me). 4nn1l2 (talk) 06:14, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

4nn1l2, I don't know what discussion you are referring to, and if it's that you're looking for specifically, I'm afraid I won't be able to help you. WP:UP#CMT, as policy, states that

Policy does not prohibit users, whether registered or unregistered, from removing comments from their own talk pages, although archiving is preferred.

Strong emphasis in original. Bot notices would fall under "comments". —Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 06:47, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tenryuu, Thanks for your response. I'm sure there was a discussion and a following consensus which allowed removing bot-archival notices about dead links by cyberbot II and InternetArchiveBot but not in a systematic manner (i.e. not by another bot or in a large amount). When I de-clutterd Talk:Ranked-choice voting in the United States, I was acting per that consensus. Now I need that discussion, but can't find it. 4nn1l2 (talk) 07:00, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I found it: Wikipedia:Village_pump_(proposals)/Archive_150#RfC:_Delete_IABot_talk_page_posts?. Please feel free to close this thread. 4nn1l2 (talk) 09:49, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats on finding it!

—Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 15:37, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edit something

In How Many time i edit something as external link — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shashank shrma (talk • contribs) 07:15, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I find it hard to understand what you are saying. However, I note that (i) you have attempted to add a link to a page within corbettuttarakhand.blogspot.com, that (ii) this is a mere blog, and that (iii) the email address provided within the blog's "about" page is remarkably similar to your username for Wikipedia. Are you attempting to add links to your own blog? -- Hoary (talk) 08:51, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

wiki article on Makau W. Mutua - personal vendetta

I noticed that the article on Kenyan-American law professor Makau W. Mutua http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Makau_W._Mutua has been incrementally changed over several months by an unregistered user who transformed it into a biased, one sided and slanderous article that does not meet BLP standards. Makau W. Mutua's professional and academic achievements are barely mentioned or removed. The references used are weak. The article is emphasizing law suits and grievances of faculty members at his university and relies heavily on "negatives". It looks like a personal vendetta piece. "Undoing" is impossible because there have been too many changes made. And I am rather new to Wikipedia and not very experienced as an editor. Could this page be put under "clean-up" or get a special notice box?

Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Whatadifference (talk • contribs) 07:36, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Whatadifference Articles are not for merely listing or emphasizing a person's accomplishments or positive aspects of their lives; they are for summarizing any and all independent reliable sources that choose to write about a person. That includes "bad" information about them. If there are specific points that you feel violate BLP, please bring them up on the article talk page. To increase the chances that other editors will see your comment, you may make it a formal edit request(click for instructions) though that is not required. 331dot (talk) 08:03, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If there's no response (or an unsatisfactory response) at Talk:Makau W. Mutua, you can bring up the matter at Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard. -- Hoary (talk) 08:46, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Links

Links added to a page are incorrect and irrelevant to the organisation — Preceding unsigned comment added by WorldNTI (talk • contribs) 11:23, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Am I right in thinking that you're writing about World Nuclear Transport Institute, WorldNTI? Materialscientist, for one, disagrees with you about that article. And have you read and digested what's been written on your user talk page? -- Hoary (talk) 12:26, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

birth certificate

how to get copy of birth certificate — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:19B:8580:15B0:F07D:FD27:5003:940A (talk) 13:29, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is the desk for help in editing or using Wikipedia, we cannot assist with general enquiries. It would also probably differ between countries. Our reference desk may be able to help. Eagleash (talk) 13:39, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

i have send about my company but you didnt publish it

i have send about my company but you didnt publish it, please confirm my lecture about my company . thank you.

With best wises, Founder of SHRApp App Development Company - Sohrab Vahidli — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shrapp (talk • contribs) 13:53, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, User:Schrapp. I can see you created an article about your company in your sandbox on 18 September 2020, here. It was deleted the next day by DESiegel as unambiguous advertising or promotion. Wikipedia is not for any kind of promotion, please see WP:NOTADVERTISING. Also, your text was in Turkish. This is the English Wikipedia. But the reason for the deletion was the promotional nature of the text, not the language. There is more information for you on your talkpage, here. PS, I can read your deleted text because I'm an admin; non-admins such as yourself can't read deleted pages. Bishonen | tålk 14:06, 6 October 2020 (UTC).[reply]

A "long comment" in French?

I can't figure out what is going on here. When I went to fix it the edit box says "This long comment was added to the page to prevent it from being listed on Special:Shortpages. It and the accompanying monitoring template were generated via Template:Long comment. Please do not remove the monitor template without removing the comment as well." so I thought I had best leave it to someone who knows what this is about.--Shantavira|^{feed me} 14:25, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Shantavira Looks like an IP address added that long text in French. I've reverted it so now it's just a link to the Wiktionary page. The long comment is just so that redirects don't appear on the short pages mointoring page. Joseph2302 (talk) 14:36, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Shantavira Joseph2302That long thing in French is pretty clearly some mischief (aka vandalism). Uporządnicki (talk) 14:39, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Здравствуйте прошу пересмотреть описание данной статьи http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Stanley_Meyer%27s_water_fuel_cell

Прочитав все работы Мейера и сравнив их с написанным в данной статье нашел некоторые аргументы и просто фразы которые были взяты не из работ Мейера а из мнения общественности.Поэтому прошу пересмотреть описание в данной статье либо убрать на некоторое время это пункт.P.S пытался править статью но мне отвечало что не аргументированно — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.139.246.188 (talk) 18:26, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is the English Wikipedia, and contributions (and questions) need to be in English. Perhaps you intended to edit the Russian Wikipedia? David Biddulph (talk) 19:07, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No, this is about the English article Stanley Meyer's water fuel cell. The OP has twice edited it, once to replace a referenced paragraph with a shorter, unreferenced, paragraph in Russian; and after that was reverted, to replace the paragaph with the words "In proces...", presumably meaning they are intending to replace it again.

Здравствуйте. вам нужно discuss any changes to the article, in English on the talk page Talk:Stanley Meyer's water fuel cell, citing reliable published sources for any information you think should be added. You should also read Fringe theories to understand why articles about fringe theories need an especially high level of referencing from reliable sources. --ColinFine (talk) 20:56, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

PEN/Laura Pels Theater Award

Hello,

I'd like to report an error on the PEN/Laura Pels Theater Award page. My name is Laura Marks, and I received the award in 2014, but on the award's page the link goes to the wikipedia page for a different Laura Marks who is not a playwright. I do not have a Wikipedia page at present, but for reference, lauramarks.net is my website if you need verification.

Thank you,

162.83.150.238 (talk) 19:21, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I have removed the incorrect link. DuncanHill (talk) 19:33, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Translation of a Wikipedia Article

Good afternoon,

I am wiring about this article on Wikipedia English about the 21st Century Icon Awards http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Draft:21st_Century_Icon_Awards

I would like to know if it is necessary to mention that this is meant to be a translation from the same article which already exists in Wikipedia Spanish. Under this name, http://es.wiki.x.io/wiki/Premios_Icono_del_Siglo_XXI or it is not relevant to mention that this is a translation. I just want add the link from Wikipedia Spanish in the languages section but the system doesn't allow me. In that case, how can I let know the experienced editor who will decide whether it should publish or not in Wikipedia English that it has already the same article in Wikipedia Spanish? Can you help me with this please?

Thank you.--Enciclopedista100 (talk) 19:38, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Enciclopedista100, you may find WP:HOWTRANS useful. It gives instructions on how to attribute that the content is from another Wikipedia. Hope it helps :) Ed talk! 19:52, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Enciclopedista100: There are three interrelated issues. 1) You must formally attribute the Spanish article to comply with its CC-BY-SA license. Do this on the talk page and/or in one or more edit summaries. 2) The back-link to the Spanish article will occur when you (or someone) updates the Wikidata item for the article, which will point to the article in each language Wikipedia . 3) you cannot use the Spanish article as a reference, since Wikipedia is not a reliable source by our own definition. You will need to use the references that the Spanish article uses. It's OK if the references are in Spanish. -Arch dude (talk) 20:03, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]