Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Kung Fu Panda/1
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result: delist Major issues remain unaddressed. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:41, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
- Prose
Two one-sentence paragraphs in Production section.Unsourced review from Chicago Tribune in Reception.It has 88% on Rotten Tomatoes. Could one of the few negative reviews be cited to give balance?
- I added 2 negative reviews from top critics on the cite (from CNN and The Toronto Star). Glimmer721 talk 16:59, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
- "By contrast, Kung Fu Panda won 11 Annie Awards (including Best Picture) out of 16 nominations, albeit amid controversy." — What did the controversy comprise?
- Most of the second paragraph contains info found nowhere else in the article (e.g. "Although the concept of a 'kung fu panda' has been around since at least 1993, work on the film did not begin until 2004"). Also, it doesn't elaborate: who first brought up the idea?
- Sources
Unsourced quote from Black in "Awards" section.Bare URLs in the Sequel section.- What makes Xbox360fanboy.com a reliable source?
- No one is tending to the article. Some references to the sequel were still written in future tense.
- I removed a citation to a forum post, which is in no way aceptable.
- Offline sources need page numbers.
Overall, I found so many problems with the article that I don't think it can get a quick fix. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 19:00, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
- I've taken care of the above (marked with a strike). I've never worked on the article before, don't know if the article passed like this, or it accumulated after it was passed. There were a lot of unsourced sentences in the box office section. About the award controversy, the part is linked to Annie Award#2009 which explains the "controversy". —Mike Allen 04:06, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
- Delist. Although I agree with TenPoundHammer's concerns cited above, Xbox360fanboy.com is not a reliable source. There are too many unsourced sentences and no issues addressed above. JJ98 (Talk / Contributions) 06:03, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.