Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Cedar Fire/1

Cedar Fire

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review

Result: Kept. 🌙Eclipse (she/they/all neos • talk • edits) 21:58, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Uncited statements in the "Investigation" section. Z1720 (talk) 20:35, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Z1720: I've removed the uncited information that I couldn't find a source for and added sources for things I could find a source for. How does it look? E_F⁵ 21:02, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@EF5: Added a citation needed tag for a paragraph in "Investigation". Z1720 (talk) 21:12, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Z1720, added sources. — E_F⁵ 21:27, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. My concerns have been addressed and resolved. Z1720 (talk) 21:28, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.