Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/tree
Nice Photo
- Nominate and support. - Kunalkarki 21:59, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
- Comment. Hi there. I noticed that you are pretty new to Wikipedia. So, welcome! For featured images, we need to see them included in any article, otherwise they can't be considered. Alternatively, you can upload the image to the Wikipedia Commons where I don't believe that it needs to be associate with an article, but it still can be considered a Featured Picture. If you have any questions, leave them for me on my talk page. Nice image. --PS2pcGAMER (talk) 22:19, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
- Comment This is an attractive pic but I'm afraid it isn't eligible for FP because it doesn't illustrate an encyclopedic topic. Please see the criteria for guidance as to what we look for in featured pictures ~ Veledan • Talk 22:30, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose. Agree with above, plus, it doesn't have a license. Alr 00:30, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose Not FP material in any way, in my opinion. Not sharp, not interesting, shows nothing well not even the tree - Adrian Pingstone 05:53, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
Oppose No description; not encyclopedic matter; not used on any page; no reason given for upload/nomination; no license tag; user has 17 contributions, all of which (except for two to Flower) are to FPC or that image; and I just don't think it's a FP quality picture. I'd be happy to keep it on Wikipedia or Commons, just not as an FP. —Vanderdecken∴∫ξφ 12:52, 25 March 2006 (UTC)- Oppose, not used in any article, and all of the above. --Dschwen 20:51, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
Not promoted As per discussion on Wikipedia talk:Featured picture candidates. Also, the image will most likely be deleted very soon since it lacks any source info after a week. However, if the image does get the correct source info, the image may be relisted on FPC. --PS2pcGAMER (talk) 09:26, 2 April 2006 (UTC)