Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Russian cruiser Moskva
Appearance
![](http://up.wiki.x.io/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/c9/Project_1164_Moskva_2009_G1.jpg/480px-Project_1164_Moskva_2009_G1.jpg)
- Reason
- Best photo of this warship IMO, awarded as "Valued Image" on Commons. This warship was used in the 2008 Russia-Georgia War.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Russian cruiser Moskva
- Creator
- George Chernilevsky
- Support as nominator --George Chernilevsky talk 16:49, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
- Support Good image with high EV. --Herby talk thyme 17:35, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
- Support -MBK004 01:25, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - The colour in the image is noticeably cool and undersaturated. I've tried playing around with both and whilst this does improve things, the JPEG compression is clearly evident at 100%. It's certainly a valuable image to have, but since it's a ship still in service the EV doesn't make up for its technical shortcomings. bad_germ 10:45, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
- Weak oppose per bad germ --Muhammad(talk) 18:29, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
- Support per nomination. Normal color and saturation for the subject. Durova403 04:49, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
- Support This is a handsome photo of an important warship. While I'm not a technical expert, the colours look fine to me. Nick-D (talk) 22:41, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - It has compression artifacts (when look it at full zoom they can be seen in dark areas, and other areas are blurry). Can this be fixed so I can change my vote for this great picture? - ☩Damërung ☩. -- 01:44, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
- In is no artifacts in dark area IMO, rather reflections from water waves. I can quickly correct quality with reduce the size of this image, however it is bad idea IMO. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:30, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
Not promoted --Makeemlighter (talk) 01:48, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
- I've commented on this outcome at the FPC talk page, Wikipedia talk:Featured picture candidates#Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Russian cruiser Moskva. Maedin\talk 21:38, 4 February 2010 (UTC)