Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Mycena galericulata
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 22 Oct 2010 at 18:27:14 (UTC)
![](http://up.wiki.x.io/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a8/Mycena_60303.jpg/260px-Mycena_60303.jpg)
- Reason
- The article's not the best (though it is by no means terrible), but hopefully someone will get around to working on it at some point soon; it's a moderately well known mushroom. Regardless, wonderful composition, high quality photography and obvious EV.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Mycena galericulata, Mycena inclinata
- FP category for this image
- Fungi
- Creator
- Dan Molter
- Support as nominator --J Milburn (talk) 18:27, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support Ticks all the boxes - EV, high res, pleasing composition. Aaadddaaammm (talk) 20:30, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support --George Chernilevsky talk 13:41, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Don't think it is that sharp for a macro, some noise and CA visible in parts. Fletcher (talk) 03:08, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support as photographer Thank you for the nomination J Milburn. Another little brown mushroom ;)
I do not see problems with sharpness. There is some chromatic adoration - the thin purple line along the top of the mushroom's cap. This is a limitation of the camera. It shows up on all photos where a light object stands out against a dark background. The imperfection has been noted in photos from Canon Powershots going back to the A-70. The CA is only noticeable at full-size, and even then it is not distracting. If somebody has the means and inclination to make the image better, then I would happily support an alternate. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shroomydan (talk • contribs) 15:43, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
- Comment Fletcher mentioned CA, but the imperfection in the photo is really purple fringing.
http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Purple_fringing —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shroomydan (talk • contribs) 16:37, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
- Weak oppose: Ditto what Fletcher said, particularly regarding CA. Maedin\talk 12:38, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
4 S, 1.5 O -> less than five required supports
Not promoted Papa Lima Whiskey (talk) 21:52, 22 October 2010 (UTC)