Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Michael Schumacher Ferrari 2004.jpg
Appearance
![](http://up.wiki.x.io/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/d3/Michael_Schumacher_Ferrari_2004.jpg/350px-Michael_Schumacher_Ferrari_2004.jpg)
- Reason
- Excellent image: A very well done Motion blur: as it must be. Encyclopedical relevant, too. Brilliant.
- Articles this image appears in
- Creator
- Rdikeman
regards, —αἰτίας •discussion• 21:40, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
- Support reasons see above —αἰτίας •discussion• 21:40, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
- Comment Does not meet 1000px minimum size. I agree that it's a great photo. -- Coneslayer (talk) 21:44, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
- Okay, but size is not the highest precept. At least in my opinion. —αἰτίας •discussion• 21:56, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
- That's why we have documented criteria, instead of everyone coming up with their own. -- Coneslayer (talk) 13:18, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
- Okay, but size is not the highest precept. At least in my opinion. —αἰτίας •discussion• 21:56, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
- oppose too small. Looks like it's on a hill. de Bivort 21:48, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
- What an absurdism. —αἰτίας •discussion• 21:55, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
- You're nice! But here's some punctuation in case that was the confusing issue. de Bivort 05:27, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose too small, the slant does make it look on a hill but thats not really a problem. Chris_huhtalk 21:57, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose, far, far too small. --Aqwis (talk – contributions) 22:07, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose, does not meet criteria #2. Cacophony (talk) 03:59, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose. Too small; slanted. --Malachirality (talk) 20:38, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose I dont mind the slant but the size is indeed too small. Minimum requirements 1000 px. H92110 (talk) 15:15, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
Not promoted MER-C 03:04, 26 December 2007 (UTC)