Jump to content

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Municipalities of Tlaxcala/archive1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Municipalities of Tlaxcala (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Nominator(s): Mattximus (talk) 00:06, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominated more list of Mexican State municipalities, almost done! It has a standardized format that now includes 52 (!!) lists of municipalities all around the world. Inspired by these real encyclopedias with consistent formatting and high standard, the project is taking shape. I tried to incorporate changes from previous nominations, including the recently passed Morelos but I'm sure I've missed some and there can always be improvements. Thanks for your reviews! Mattximus (talk) 00:06, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

[edit]
  • "16 new municipalities were created in 1995" => "In 1995, 16 new municipalities were created" would avoid starting a sentence with a number in digit form, which probably isn't technically invalid but always looks a bit wrong to me......
  • You are absolutely correct, not sure why I didn't notice that before nomination.

Comments

[edit]
  • Might be nitpicky, but I would consider including "1917" in the "Constitution of Mexico" as there happens to be more than one revision. Understandable if it seems a bit odd, not super concerned about it.
  • Property tax could be linked.
  • In note D, it mentions Sanctórum but it might be worthy to include the name pre-change as that's when it happened.

Other than that, good work! I find it funny that Calpulalpan has to be the odd one out when it comes to the founding date. Klinetalkcontribs 04:17, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Kline! Those are excellent catches showing a careful review, I've made them all. Thank you! Mattximus (talk) 15:52, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Looks good, support! Klinetalkcontribs 18:15, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Kline you uncovered something important accidentally with your Calpulalpan comment. It looks like these dates sometimes report earliest known record of date of incorporation when the official date is unknown. I am experimenting with putting a note to this effect, but I can't figure out how to make all the notes link to one note so it's not repetitive. Any thoughts? I will have to change this with all the other lists once we figure this out. Mattximus (talk) 19:35, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Mattximus pretty sure this can be done with Template:efn. Klinetalkcontribs 20:43, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Image review

[edit]
  • File:Vista de Tlaxcala.jpg — CC-BY-SA-4.0 — Self-published work — Alt text present
  • File:Tapetehuamantla.jpg — CC-BY-SA-4.0 — Self-published work — Alt text present
  • File:Panorama de San Pablo del Monte.png — CC-BY-SA-4.0 — Self-published work — Alt text present
  • File:Vistas de Apizaco, Tlaxcala 03.jpg — CC-BY-SA-4.0 — Self-published work — Alt text present
  • File:Tlaxcala in Mexico (zoom).svg - CC BY-SA 3.0 — Self-published work — Alt text present
Suggestions
[edit]
  • Spelling of "aerial" in the alt text for Tlaxcala is wrong - Kindly rectify that.
  • Change the alt text for Huamantla to something like this : "Decorative sawdust carpet, Huamantla"

Please ping me when you have made the changes. The AP (talk) 16:58, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review The AP ! I have completed both of your requests. Mattximus (talk) 00:25, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Pass Image review and support on prose The AP (talk) 10:38, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Source review – Reference reliability looks okay, and the link-checker tool showed no issues. A couple of little formatting tweaks to consider:

  • Refs 1, 2 and 7 could use en dashes in the title to replace the hyphens per the MoS.
  • The ISBN formatting is done three separate ways. I think 13-digits with hyphens is the preferred method (IIRC), but either way they should be made consistent throughout. Giants2008 (Talk) 22:22, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]