Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of number-one albums of 2008 (U.S.)/archive1
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Matthewedwards 07:12, 11 April 2009 [1].
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured list because it was reviewed and I feel it meets the criteria. Regards, Efe (talk) 13:24, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - I make a couple minor edits, but overall the prose looks pretty good. –Juliancolton Talk · Review 18:22, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Truco
|
---|
|
- Support -- Previous issues resolved to meet WP:WIAFL standards.--Best, ₮RUCӨ 01:29, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I tried to ask Sandy. Thinks she's busy as of now. --Efe (talk) 09:45, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments
- "longest-running album" sounds like the album is of the longest duration. Maybe "had the longest run" is better?
- That is clarified by the supporting phrase "is the longest-running album among the releases that have reached peak position in 2008". --Efe (talk) 05:59, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- No, I meant it can be misconstrued as total length of the album (in terms of hours, minutes, seconds). indopug (talk) 06:21, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Yeah. Your right. I have changed it based on your suggestion. --Efe (talk) 06:54, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- No, I meant it can be misconstrued as total length of the album (in terms of hours, minutes, seconds). indopug (talk) 06:21, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Considering that you have a lot of white space in the side, I think you can add a few of pictures of artists. Eg: Metallica, for consecutive weeks at the top, or Radiohead, for most vinyl records sold.
- Added two images for best albums in digital and vinyl formats. --Efe (talk) 05:59, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I think the issue dates column would look much better if you align the entries to the right. indopug (talk) 15:46, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Hmm. That's a general comment. Any changes to a single list must reflect to all pages. I think we can discuss this at the project page, I suggest. --Efe (talk) 05:59, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support, all issues resolved. Dabomb87 (talk) 04:03, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved issues, Dabomb87 (talk) |
---|
Comments from Dabomb87 (talk · contribs)
|
Sources look good. Dabomb87 (talk) 23:50, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I confirm my support after the criteria changes. Dabomb87 (talk) 12:19, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Despite the new FL criteria, this list is still up to those standards. My Support for promotion stands.--Truco 14:59, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Further
- Shouldn't the artist for Juno and other soundtracks be "Various artists"? Soundtrack could possibly be part of the album name, like "Juno soundtrack". indopug (talk) 16:41, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Date format of references should be the same as in the main body of the article, in this case, mmmm dd, yyyy. Matthewedwards : Chat 02:44, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
Hidden category: