Wikipedia:Featured article review/Space elevator/archive1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was removed 07:43, 1 September 2007.
Review commentary
[edit]- Messages left at WP Space and WP Space exploration.
- Messages left at Fredrik, Wolfkeeper, Bryan Derksen, Rei and Psb777.
Article about a potential future technology promoted to the featured status in March 2004. Over 1000 edits since then. Needs some updating/overhaul. Potential problems: verifiability (Category:Articles with unsourced statements since April 2007) (1.c), lack of inline citations (1.c), style (rethorical questions?), stability (?) (1.e). Qblik talk 20:27, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Insufficient referencing, too long an article, stubby paragraphs; needs major cleanup —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.36.182.217 (talk • contribs) 21:18, July 27, 2007
- Comments. One-sentence popular culture section, numerous one- and two-sentence paragraphs, external link farm, missing and unformatted refs, external jumps, lacking citations, needs attention to WP:DASH and WP:MOSBOLD. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 04:07, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
FARC commentary
[edit]- Suggested FA criteria concerns are referencing (1c), stub paragraphs and MoS issues (2). Marskell 08:40, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Remove The problems identified during the review stage are not resolved. DrKiernan 13:55, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Remove, issues not addressed. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 01:04, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Remove per 1c and 2. LuciferMorgan 23:19, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.