Wikipedia:Featured article review/Slayer/archive1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was delisted by Nikkimaria via FACBot (talk) 3:58, 13 August 2022 (UTC) [1].
- Notified: M3tal H3ad, MetalDiablo666, Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team, WikiProject Musicians, WikiProject Slayer, WikiProject Metal, WikiProject Rock music, WikiProject American music, Vital articles/Level/5, 2021-03-05, 2022-05-30
Review section
[edit]I am nominating this featured article for review because, as noted on the talk page last year, there are numerous sources that can be evaluated for inclusion in the article, failed verification of sources, uncited statements, and a "Controversy" section that I think should be integrated into other sections of the article. Z1720 (talk) 15:21, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Here's a giant decade-and-a-half diff of the changes to the article between its 2007 FA version and today. In 2007 it had 22,900 characters (3,751 words) of "readable prose size", according to the DYKcheck tool—54.6 kb total size. Since then, it has expanded to 134.8 kb in total, with 47,557 characters (7,974 words) of readable prose, a doubling in size.
- Additions to the article include the awards section, and everything happening after 2007 such as two more albums and Hanneman's death. The old "Feuds" section was removed (no great loss), and the "Influences" section was rewritten and expanded as "Legacy".
- Even in 2007, the article contained a controversy section. Such sections are no longer recommended practice; controversy about the topic should be introduced and detailed throughout the article as part of the developing narrative. Binksternet (talk) 17:22, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to FARC, no engagement, new sources have not been worked in, Controversy section is a problem. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 14:55, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to FARC, needed improvements are not occurring. Hog Farm Talk 00:11, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to FARC no major edits to the article to address my concerns. Z1720 (talk) 21:34, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
FARC section
[edit]- Issues raised in the review section include sourcing and structure. Nikkimaria (talk) 03:14, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist: Nothing happening, concerns remain. Z1720 (talk) 01:45, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist nothing happening. Hog Farm Talk 02:20, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist no progress, issues remain. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 03:35, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This removal candidate has been delisted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please leave the {{featured article review}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Nikkimaria (talk) 03:58, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.