Wellness International Network, Ltd. v. Sharif
| Wellness International Network, Ltd. v. Sharif | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Decided May 26, 2015 | |
| Full case name | Wellness International Network, Ltd. v. Sharif |
| Citations | 575 U.S. 665 (more) |
| Holding | |
| Bankruptcy courts may adjudicate Stern claims with the parties' knowing and voluntary consent. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Sotomayor, joined by Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, Kagan, Alito (in part) |
| Concurrence | Alito (in part) |
| Dissent | Roberts, joined by Scalia; Thomas (Part I only) |
| Dissent | Thomas |
| Laws applied | |
| U.S. Const. art. III | |
Wellness International Network, Ltd. v. Sharif, 575 U.S. 665 (2015), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that bankruptcy courts may adjudicate Stern claims with the parties' knowing and voluntary consent.[1][2][3]
References
[edit]- ^ Wellness International Network, Ltd. v. Sharif, 575 U.S. 665 (2015).
- ^ "Opinion analysis: Justices reaffirm authority of bankruptcy judges based on parties' consent". SCOTUSblog. May 27, 2015. Retrieved December 4, 2024.
- ^ "Commentary: Wellness after Stern". SCOTUSblog. May 28, 2015. Retrieved December 4, 2024.
External links
[edit]- Text of Wellness International Network, Ltd. v. Sharif, 575 U.S. 665 (2015) is available from: Cornell Findlaw Justia
 | This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |