User talk:Zzuuzz/Archive 3

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Division of Melbourne Ports

I trust you will reprotect this article as soon as the libellous anti-Semite vandal returns? Adam 01:21, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Only admins can protect and unprotect pages. See WP:RPP. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 01:26, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you don't know what has been going on you should have left the page alone. Adam 02:10, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was clearing the inappropriate template from it. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 02:12, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In that case I expect you to deal with him the next time he returns to spread his libellous anti-Semitic filth (which has been deleted from the edit history, by the way). If you don't you will be hearing from me. Adam 03:41, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I fail to see what you are talking about - what will you be saying to me if he returns? -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 04:04, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I will be saying that since those involved in the dispute protected the article last night, and since you have chosen to unprotect it, despite not knowing anything about the dispute, the responsibility for dealing with the vandal when he returns now rests with you. Adam 04:18, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps we are at cross purposes here. This is why it is not protected. I unprotected nothing. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 11:03, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

So it seems. My apologies for misunderstanding your actions. But when I saw this sequence:

(cur) (last) 23:31, 30 September 2006 Zzuuzz (Talk | contribs) (this article is no longer sprotected)
(cur) (last) 12:27, 29 September 2006 Longhair (Talk | contribs) ({{sprotected}})

what else was I to conclude? If you didn't unprotect the atrticle, who did? Adam 11:13, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I hope my other comments make more sense now. The article was protected, then deleted, then selected revisions were restored - presumably not including the revision which had the protection applied. This had the effect of making the protection 'fall off'. Your conclusions were reasonable. It even had VoA fooled per above diff. There were two ways of checking: 1) see if I was an admin and capable of unprotecting, and 2) view the page without logging in. rgds -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 11:19, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

St Peter's College, Adelaide

What is your problem? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 202.6.138.34 (talk • contribs) .

Edits like this and this are vandalism. Please stop it. Thanks. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 12:13, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Whats rong with Fossy!

I just noticed you request it to be deleted. My friend found this page and showed it me, and beleive me, i found it amazing that another user has actualy put this on here! Its incredable to find words i used to use at school! im appaled you have decided against it, it is a slang term, and is hard to back up with a source other than user comments, such as this.

Plus, things like God, and ancient Myths are impossible to back up with so called "sources"—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.155.232.16 (talk • contribs) .

Yes I supported the deletion. Wikipedia is not a slang dictionary - terms like this should be verifiable from reliable sources, such as those you would find published in religious books, or books on history. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 20:37, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

One rule for them...

Hi, you just sent me this message:

Please do not add commercial links or links to your own private websites to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. You are, however, encouraged to add content instead of links to the encyclopedia. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. -- zzuuzz (talk) 09:28, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

If we are not allowed to do it, then other agencies should not be allowed to do it either. We are only following the example of others in the same business. We added to the external links area along with other businesses in our own category and on one page (which talked about small and large agencies - with external links) we did the same as them but for mid size company like us. I dont understand if its one rule for them and one for us. I realised I was not allowed to set up my own page as it said we could not have one for our own company, but a similar company like EMAP has one.

Sorry if we broke the rules but they need clarifying.

Many thanks —The preceding unsigned comment was added by T2 studios (talk • contribs) .

Hi. The external link guidelines are probably what you are looking for, and there is more here and here. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 10:25, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Creation Seventh Day Adventist Church tag removal

The tag was working quite well on its own in preventing edit warring. Quite amazing actually. Thanks for removing it though. I wasn't game to myself as I had not heard back from User:UninvitedCompany about their intentions for possibly putting actual protection on the page. Ansell 08:25, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Magic

Side note (no need to respond : ) - You may wish to check out the rest of User:Matsimons's contributions. - jc37 18:56, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Already noted - Just waiting for the initial deletion ;) -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 19:15, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Initial deletion? - jc37 19:40, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The clock is now ticking on this user's main contribution to this encyclopaedia - the article about his/her own website which is now pending deletion. Once that is deleted there will be a ton of redlinks to clean up IYKWIM. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 19:47, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently, here's another one? - jc37 05:44, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for telling me

I use WP:RPP to apply for semi-protection on Mike Francesa. --Chaohwa 20:35, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Public Speaking

Thank you for your immediate removal of my vandalism of the public speaking site. I was doing a test for my Speech Communication class showing how quickly vandalism is removed from Wikipedia articles. I am actually doing a speech on the validity of Wikipedia in the classroom and you helped my position. Sorry I wasted your time, but thanks for your help! --Testforclass 21:40, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rampage

Psalmuel appears to be going on a rampage now. I'd rather not catch the attention of an administrator by reverting his latest edits, but this is incredible. Would you mind undoing this latest set of edits and page creations? Simões (^talk/_contribs) 00:09, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately it is a page move mess. The best thing would be to, as you have, discuss the issue and reach some consensus on how to proceed. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 00:24, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Church

Hello Zzuzz, I got this message on my page from you... I was able to take your advise and maintain the details on the subject. Cheers.

3RR Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert a single page more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. -- zzuuzz (talk) 23:33, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Deletion of comments Please do not immediately delete comments from your talk page merely because you find them unpleasant. See Help:Talk page. Simões (talk/contribs) 23:45, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Removing comments Please do not remove legitimate warnings from your talk page or replace them with inappropriate content. Removing or maliciously altering warnings from your talk page will not remove them from the page history. You're welcome to archive your talk page, but be sure to provide a link to any deleted legitimate comments. If you continue to remove or vandalize legitimate warnings from your talk page, you will lose your privilege of editing your talk page. Thanks. -- zzuuzz (talk) 23:52, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Church I've left some comments at Talk:Church. Your input would be appreciated. -- zzuuzz (talk) 23:52, 28 October 2006 (UTC)....

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Psalmuel (talk • contribs) .

Penis straw poll

Please add your view at Talk:Penis#Discussion_of_Herpes_picture. Thanks, Atom 15:22, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Thanks for that, if you need any help ask me.

Mr. Garrison

↑ That's right Mr. Hat!

Thanks

Thanks for the reply! --Ajdrosario 23:33, 31 October 2006 (UTC)Karla[reply]

Your help is invaluable... thanks for the help! HUGS!--Ajdrosario 23:39, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That is so cool of you! Thanks so much. I love your wording...automagically..LOL, thanks again! HUGS! --karla ^(talk) 00:01, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, I also copied your signature! Hope you won't mind?!? Hugs again! --karla ^(talk) 00:02, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hoaxes are hot!

and if I don't feel like it? Brdforallseasons 19:21, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

umm...you think I'm actually trying to help here? Brdforallseasons 19:26, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Brdforallseasons has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing!

Re:monobook

Nothing works - popups, menus, nothing. I've tried for the past couple of hours to fix it. Z388 14:38, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I did that (and it worked). Thanks. Z388 15:33, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Randan

Hi, in this article word stroke redirects wrong. I don't know english well, could you fix it? 02:04, 5 November 2006 (UTC)~

It's fixed - I replaced it with stern. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 02:32, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Have a cookie!

City of London School

Why do you keep deleting info about Sir Simon Lucas?—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 86.129.66.199 (talk • contribs) .

He is being described a "descendant of Humpty Dumpty and friend of Garlic". Can you provide a reliable source to verify this statement? -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 20:28, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Charles_Lucas http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Simon_Lucas —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Simonlucas (talk • contribs) .

Thank you. Unfortunately we cannot use your edits to Wikipedia as a source. The information will be removed, and if you continue in this manner you are likely to be blocked. Please consider improving the encyclopaedia. Thanks. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 20:53, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sydney Grammar School

This is getting silly. How do you feel about applying for semi-protection? Mr Stephen 01:29, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was just thinking that. On its way. We would have to protect Sydney Boys High School too. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 01:42, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think you're right. It's after half-past one in the morning here, and I'm heading to the land of Nodd after a trying Guy Fawkes Night. Good luck. Mr Stephen 01:45, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Request placed. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 01:47, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Virtual Interactive Streetscapes not useful?

Hi, I would like to appeal in the strongest possible terms to your removing all references to http://www.superhighstreet.com from Wikipedia. Up until yesterday the links had proved very relevant to your visitors for months at several pages including Oxford Street, Portobello Road, Notting Hill Carnival, and Richmond Upon Thames. These links go to a Virtual Interactive Streetscape for Wikipedia users to discover more about these city centres.

Yesterday we provided you with several more links to the virtual streetscape pages for several more cities. Admittedly these are not yet live but 'coming soon', however we were trying to be well prepared.

Would you be able to agree that Wikipedia users researching a city or street would find a virtual streetscape effictively allowing them to walk down that city's street useful? Is that not within the spirit of Wikipedia?

If you do not agree, then it raises the issue that you are contradicting all the previous editors who felt this was within the spirit of the site, and which led to those links mentioned above providing months of usefulness to your visitors, until your intervention today.

Assuring you of our best intentions at all times and for the community as a whole. --Ewik 13:52, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you put the links there yourself your argument is moot. If editors think the links are useful they will add them back, or I would suggest you might mention the link on the talk page and see what people think. Please don't add the links back yourself, especially those which were 'in preparation for future content'. People promoting their sites here affect the objectivity of this encyclopaedia - and it is an encyclopaedia, not a repository for links. You can find out more about the guidelines at WP:COI, WP:NOT, WP:EL, and WP:SPAM. Thanks. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 20:12, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks, zzuuzz. I'm learning (slowly but surely). I do appreciate your feedback. Sincerely, Scott Scottagross 23:23, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

I plan to ask you some questions. Thank you.

John 02:51, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. You can ask either here, or on your talk page. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 02:56, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Thanks for the welcome. Am I allowed to copy codes from other users? I want to copy parts from Anonymous' and Voldemort's pages. Half-Blood Auror 18:49, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You can certainly swipe some parts - it is probably polite not to make a complete duplicate, or make it look too similar by copying the words, but to understand how they are made and use similar techniques is by all means acceptable. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 18:55, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ok. thanks. Half-Blood Auror 21:59, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Timmins, Ontario

Thank you for your response on my talk page in regards to editing this article. It is much appreciated and I will take your advice. Gaudreaur 19:22, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've just added another comment on my talk page if you could kindly respond. Gaudreaur 22:27, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've noticed you removed the Kylah Eide link from the Timmins, Ontario page and marked her article for deletion. I was going to do much of the same but was busy reading all the help files on how to actually go about doing that. This whole wikipedia thing sure has a learning curve. Renrenren 01:27, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Post University Content

Thank you for your response in regards to me editing the Post University article. I'm the Marketing Director of Post University, M. Parravicini. I report directly to Tom Samph, PhD., CEO of Post Education, Inc. I have been requested to update your content with content from our website, www.post.edu. Can we change this content? Thanks, M.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.69.108.50 (talk • contribs) .

Hi. I'd like you to read WP:COI and WP:AUTO please - apart from the previously mentioned copyright issue, material written by the marketing department will undoubtedly fail to be objective (I see it actually does fail). One of Wikipedia's fundamental policies is that content must be written from a neutral point of view. Whilst I have no personal objections to you correcting any factual inaccuracies, or using the article's talk page to discuss the article and point things out, we cannot accept the type of update you made (apart from the copyright issues). I hope you can understand this. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 21:41, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I published a revised version. Please look at it and tell me if this is ok.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.83.175.32 (talk • contribs) .

You didn't read it did you? -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 19:01, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I did, both pages... and then looked at the entry for Harvard University... they have tons of content... much of it is very "complimentary". I'm only listing a brief history of the school. My goal is not to promote it, but rather to replace what you had.

I've further changed the copy to concentrate on the history of the University without placing any emphasis on what we have to offer. Please review.

Haileybury

Thanks for your continued work on Haileybury, Melbourne - that situation was getting out of hand. --gummAY 11:19, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Senior leadership has been verified, as published by Haileybury College on 20/10/2006 and later published by Haileybury Senior School on 03/11/06 124.181.221.168 07:24, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

See the policy on verifiability. Thanks. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 12:37, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have notice the continual adding, and reverting of leadership on this page: there are two options to stop this, either information is verified, or it is continually deleted. In regards to verification, the leaders have been posted on the school notice board, and published in the newsletter plus staff information. I can help with verification if you believe the information should be contained in the article. Sendreplyfwd 11:29, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comment. I'm really not interested in continually reverting this nonsense out of the article. It is my firm belief however that this information should not be included. It is 'cruft', and of no interest to anyone. Really, the school noticeboard? That doesn't qualify as encyclopaedic knowledge, and certainly isn't verifiable - 'any reader should be able to check that material added to Wikipedia has already been published by a reliable source'. Sorry, I don't mean to sound dismissive - I hope you can bring some sense to this article. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 22:14, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dude you crazy!

Dude, you are totally not cool. Why did you leave me that message on Resume? I totally fixed it. I don't know what's up you gluteus maximus. Dog, you need to cool off your jets in a salon. Get a pedicure and don't be so upset when a brotha is just trying to have a good time. If you want to go on a date with me just leave me your number on my user talk page. Peace—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Tomnelson17 (talk • contribs) .

Thank You!

May God Bless You Always!

I wanted to persoanlly thank you for helping me with my user page. Thank you so much! I am so gateful. I know a lot about a variety subjects, but HTML and Computers are not amoung them. Thanks again!

Your Friend in Christ, (Steve 16:26, 9 November 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Thank You!

I was not spamming or adding links that should not be there. The audio book site I listed has more audio books than any of the other sites listed on the page and has far, far better prices. I only listed it because I bought a few and had a great experience.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Chefdude (talk • contribs) .

Thank you for commenting. See my comments on the article's talk page about listing sites with 'better prices'. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 22:19, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Prices aside, how id the site I listed any less relevant to the page than the others listed there? The one I listed has better selection & information about the books than any of the others. it's just an all around better resource imo. - Chefdude (talk)

220.237.61.236

220.237.61.236 added additional spam. Please review http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/User_talk:220.237.61.236 and the following links: http://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Trade&diff=prev&oldid=86729163 http://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=The_Westfield_Group&diff=prev&oldid=86728927 and many more on http://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&target=220.237.61.236 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 203.220.47.90 (talk • contribs) .

Fixed. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 03:24, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The same IP added even MORE spam to http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Ford_Falcon_XR6_Turbo which I've deleted. When will this IP stop?—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 203.220.47.90 (talk • contribs) .

I think it has stopped for now. I will check back from time to time. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 00:53, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My User Page

Hey - I noticed you reverted vandalism on my user page. Thanks Zzuuzz! --Anthony5429 03:16, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 03:24, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Pinkyetti

Thanks for that. Yes, this was another sockpuppet of Jazzper. Many of its contributions were to a hoax article on the nonexistent Environmental Society of Kirribilli, now deleted. And a copyrighted image previously uploaded by Jazzper and subsequently deleted had been re-uploaded by the Pinkyetti account under false pretenses to being the author. Disgusting really. Hesperian 14:27, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:75.80.63.244 spelling

I lost patience with User talk:75.80.63.244 a while ago and decided he's simply trolling; I've already reported him to WP:AIV. -- Jim Douglas ^(talk) _(contribs) 06:12, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Check out the explanation he just added to the bottom of his talk page. -- Jim Douglas ^(talk) _(contribs) 06:36, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

troll ... yawn ... yoosoofunny ... should have been blocked half an hour ago :-/ -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 06:48, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yup. No admins were monitoring WP:AIV. I added {{adminbacklog}}; looks like Alphachimp has started clearing stuff. -- Jim Douglas ^(talk) _(contribs) 06:54, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Stop Deleting

Stop deleting posts edits... what am i supposed to write if the source is something that was written on the notice board. they put it up at school.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 124.191.192.6 (talk • contribs) .

See the policy on verifiability. Thanks. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 12:37, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

re:redirects

I put the tag on them (except for the E@ Coffee). I think that one is important. It's so much easier to type than Wikipedia:Esperanza/Coffee Lounge. If there's an equivalent than tell me and I'll tag it. Anyways, thanks for telling me. --Randfan 02:04, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

West_Didsbury

Why do you keep deleting the link to HighlyRanked? We are a local business in the same way that the other businesses listed there are too (Great Khatmandhu and The Metropolitan). If you think that we should not be listed there then surely they should also be removed. Dazwest 16:28, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The other companies are listed as notable features of the area (one a landmark and the other an award-winner). Your link is just an advert for a SEO company, and of no relevance to Didsbury. See WP:EL. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 16:38, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A landmark and an award winner? In whose opinion is it a landmark? Its a pub! And in whose opinion are we of 'no relevance to Didsbury'? Its certainly of relevance if someone in Didsbury is looking for a local SEO company. This not an irrelevant link and its not spam! Dazwest 16:44, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not a directory of links for people looking for an SEO. Please read the guidelines again. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 19:24, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Then in the same manner it is also not a directory of links for people looking for a curry restaurant or a pub. Dazwest 09:29, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reddam_House

Re: NPOV and Verifiability. I am personally connected with individuals directly involved in the Controversy cited in the article. I know for a fact that Kim Tsoklakis resigned as requested by the Director of the School, as well as a few other details that are probably best left from the article. I just wanted to ask if you had any suggestions on what it would take to satisfy Wikipedia policy so that he article could explicitly state that he was indeed asked to resign. Obviously, any letters between the director and the former head are not available. As I mention in the talk page, I'm not actually afficliated with the School, but it really just bugs me to see a Wikipedia article that doesn't include things which I know to be fundamentally true. If you could answer on my talk page, that'd be well appreciated. Cheers :) Aurelius One 15:12, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bump (on page List of Internet slang phrases)

Hi, Zzuzz, I noticed that you added a definition for the entry "bump", referencing the page we have about the term Bump (Internet)- You may notice that I have recently been pushing along with a few other users for stronger standards for inclusion at this list- it's a very common target for anonymous editors to put in neologisms, abbreviations, things that they and their friends use, or things they made up, and as such, I've been removing material that is shakily sourced or completely unsourced. As an entry that I've seen more than one, the definition of "bump" as "bumping a discussion (to the top of a forum or whatever), I've looked and tried to find a reliable source that says this is the case, however, I have been unable to find any. The page we have on the term Bump is completely unsourced as well, and is marked as such.

Let me encourage you to help find a reliable source for this definition so that it is not necessary by the current standards in place at that page, to remove it. Thanks for your contributions. Happy editing, --Kuzaar^-T-C- 16:24, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Operation Bolo

i need help with imagery on my artilce Operation Bolo http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Operation_Bolo if u could talk me through it that would be ever so helpfull Tu-49 02:58, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Release Lillywhite Recordings Campaign

Hi,

How are you?

I am proposing that the following article: Release Lillywhite Recordings Campaign be deleted. There is no proof that this campaign led to the recording of Busted Stuff, or was acknowledged by the DMB or RCA people. While the campaign was mentioned in Rolling Stone and Entertainment Weekly, I don't think that is grounds enough to have a separate article. Please comment on the Talk page. Thanks. Milchama 17:43, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps you might consider using WP:AFD for this purpose. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 13:48, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ANPR

Hi

Why do you keep deleting my links?

With regards to your defence of Wikipedias non-commercial nature, there are a number of other commercial links in there. Fact is that commercial applications are what is driving this industry now, just as much as defence and public sector influences.

Additionally, frequently in business, some people are in it because of their interest in the field. Why is that wrong?

There are also a number of other commercial organisations with links in the article.

Why do they remain but you keep deleting our links.

The stuff on our site that we link to is perfectly valid and is an easy to understand, non-technical explanation of ANPR systems.

Why do you think it's wrong?

Why are the other commerical organisations left in there?

Will you stop deleting these links?

Athena —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 83.217.105.206 (talk • contribs) .

I have not mentioned commercialism once. You already have a link in the article. There is no point in having many. Have you thought of adding content to the article? -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 18:48, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reply. I could add content but there is already quite a lot of technical stuff.

The two particular links that have been deleted this time, were in a section relating to how and where to use ANPR. Those links went to already well prepared pages that illustrated in a lot more detail and more clearly i would say, than the content placed directly into the article currently.

I would like to link to those two pages so people can more clearly see the content, graphics, pictures, examples of reports and GUI for instance. They are links directly to content.

I also think it should be ok to have a main link in the section for ANPR developers as others do. ATHENA

Qualifications re: real estate broker

Yes, when a piece of illiterate nonsense is written by someone who clearly hasn't a clue about the difference between the concept of "Agency law" and "an agency" (i.e. a business entity), then one would hope that that person would (i) register himself on the system, and/or (2) state his degree of expertise or qualifications to write such stuff.

This idiot does neither; and he certainly provides no justification for writing what he did. My entries on that page include considerable reference material. Vivaverdi 03:47, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Again I disagree with your requirements for competence to edit. Without commenting on edits to this particular article, some of the best edits to Wikipedia are made by editors with neither, and some of the worst are made by editors with both. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 03:57, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Coherer Ref

Could you help me fix the footnote for Coherer? -thanks John 06:21, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have the PDF paper but I think the ref is French, and needs to be a footnote, right?

Protection fell off

Zzuuzz wrote:

You recently deleted and restored this page - for your information. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 04:05, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for pointing that out. The page was originally protected to stop the user (who is indefinitely blocked) removing warnings from their page. Since this was three months ago, I doubt they'll try again (if they do come back they'll just create a new account), so I won't bother re-protecting it – Gurch 11:40, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

happy Turkey Day!!!!!

I wish you a very merry Thanksgiving! Hope you and your family have a magnificent day! So, what are you thankful for? Hooray and happy gormandizi^ŋ! --Randfan _{please talk talk to me!}

Have a great day! Please respond on my talk page (the red "fan" link in my signature). Cheers! :)—Rand fan!!

Cheers! :)—Rand fan!! has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile at others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing!

is there a problem?

listen, what is your fucking deal? Why do you keep removing my contrib about Red Hill, Queensland? I challenge you to prove any of the content I included as false or misrepresented. You personally may consider it irrelevant or whatever, but you are way out of your depth...so cut the bullshit!

What's the point of allowing people to add/delete/modify information if the information needs to have been previously published? Why don't you just copy the fucking Encarta onto your website? Heaps of Wiki pages I have seen have no sources - eg information about towns and cities? Am I therefore wasting my time? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by K42 (talk • contribs) .

Hi K42. You have it precisely the wrong way around - I challenge you to prove any of the content you added is true. These policies (which I linked to earlier) are there to prevent anyone from adding, well, basically all the random made-up stuff there is. Wikipedia allows anyone to edit in case they can improve the encyclopaedia. An encyclopaedia contains published knowledge, not tales about your mates. Yes, there are lots of improvements still to be made to Wikipedia. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 11:13, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Adminship

Hi ZZuuzz, I've noticed you've been contributing more regularly recently. If you're able to devote the time again, we're still fairly short of admins so the offer still stands... --Robdurbar 14:08, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Robdurbar, you're a star. Sorry I had to bum out of the last one. I am due for a wikibreak soon, and then I should probably take a break from working on articles to make some noise at AFD to satisfy the editcountisists (and perhaps go and buy a digital camera so my image contributions add up to the required level). I honestly don't think I'll bother with a featured article though :) OK, soon huh. rgds. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 19:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bedford School

hi there, just wondering why my edits for the "bedford school" page were removed. They are entirely factual and as a member of the school i beilve just. I'm not entirely sure how u will be able to answer this question, but im sure there is an answer and im sure u have a way to answer.

Many thanks, Sam—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 86.129.196.15 (talk • contribs) .

Hi. Wikipedia has policies about a) neutrality and b) verifiability. Phrases such as "no wind of compensation", as if it should be expected, and "a slap in the face for those parents", are a little too extreme for an encyclopaedia which reports facts from a neutral point of view. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 12:12, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks , I will read those and post something a little more neutral. Many thanks for your help.Sam—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 86.129.196.15 (talk • contribs) .

Huh?

What'd you just do to my profile?—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 138.130.212.9 (talk • contribs) .

Hi. Nothing to worry about - just removing an old template. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 13:48, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]