User talk:ZincBelief

AfD nomination of List of Go software

I have nominated List of Go software, an article you created, for deletion. Contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated. However, I do not feel that List of Go software satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and I have explain why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the open discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Go software and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of List of Go software during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Anshuk (talk) 02:20, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted before I had time to discuss it...--ZincBelief (talk) 11:24, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Game

		The Resilient Barnstar
		for your dogged efforts in restoring the image! Fences and windows (talk) 22:46, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers, I am just tired of the cartel of admins abusing their position to prevent reasonable changes to that page.--ZincBelief (talk) 23:41, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

this is nothing folks, you should see what ohnoitsjamie and mickmacnee put me through simply for taking an interest in this topic and trying to improve the The Game (mind game) and Jonty Haywood articles. check out my talk page and its archive if you're interested. and if you're still interested i can try to find the other huge discussions on the white-listing pages, black-listing pages, various admin talk pages, ors ticket pages, ssp pages... i wasted about 2 months trying to make some very minor improvements to the haywood article. anyway i've pretty much given up with wikipedia since i was blocked. good luck guys Jessi1989 (talk) 06:09, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Review at Talk:Go (game)/GA2

This article has had a review. I have asked the reviewer to put it on hold rather than fail it, as the main issue appears to be cutting down sections that have their own main articles elsewhere. Cheers, hamiltonstone (talk) 01:43, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ok cheers--ZincBelief (talk) 14:40, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Go (game)

Current revision as of 12:35, 31 August 2010 ZincBelief

FYI: Japan Go Association —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.219.168.153 (talk) 13:52, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Game (again)

He appears to have a personal vendetta against me, my friends and my website, not just The Game and its article. Check out my userpage for a detailed account of my history on Wikipedia. Kernow (talk) 07:03, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:17, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Mkboard.png

Thanks for uploading File:Mkboard.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, BOT-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate your file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:TibetBoard.gif

Thank you for uploading File:TibetBoard.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 01:57, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is no statute of limitations on these things I hope!

		The Winnowing Fan Barnstar
		Long overdue, but you deserve it (from seeing your comments on a talk page of which I agree with!) 71.215.83.8 (talk) 23:48, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]