User talk:ZZenyx

September 2024

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at User:ZZenyx/Typhoon Isaac (Julian), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Bbb23 (talk) 22:27, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

wdym it's my personal sandbox ZZenyx (talk) 22:29, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You can't create hoaxes anywhere on Wikipedia.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:31, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You might be interested in this wiki instead. -- asilvering (talk) 22:55, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lemme try i'm not used to that cuz I have learned wikitext

Mkay? ZZenyx (talk) 22:57, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you add any more hoax ~~contact~~ content to Wikipedia, you will be blocked. You accused Bbb23 of misconduct which was false. It was you who engaged in misconduct. Cullen328 (talk) 00:51, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think Cullen328 meant hoax content. Anyway since it hasn't been mentioned that I saw, I suggest you take a read of WP:NOTWEBHOST. While hoax content is particularly problematic, note that in any case your sandbox and all pages on en.wikipedia including those in your user space are not intended for you to store material that is unrelated to improving the English Wikipedia. If you are using your sandbox to learn how to use wikitext, that might be okay but make sure you don't do it by making hoaxes or posting anything else that is a problem, for example anything that violates WP:BLP or someone else's copyright (i.e. is a WP:COPYVIO). If you are having problems distinguishing what text might be okay to add to your sandbox while learning to use wikitext, consider using Lorem ipsum or something similar. Nil Einne (talk) 05:14, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I understand, I misunderstood WP:FAKEARTICLES and I will no longer repeat it. ZZenyx (talk) 10:43, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here.~~~~}}. v/r - T P 15:12, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ZZenyx (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will try to find a source to add citations to articles which lack citations, I will fix grammar errors, I will do everything in my power to improve an article, and for the sandbox, i'll just try templates and put interesting infoboxes in there. ZZenyx (talk) 04:19, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This doesn't tell us what you will do instead. Please give a specific example of a substantive edit you would make to an article. It does not need to be a multiparagraph addition, but it should be more than fixing spelling. 331dot (talk) 08:31, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

pls ZZenyx (talk) 04:19, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]