User talk:Ysogo

Welcome!

Hello, Ysogo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Chris (talk) 23:03, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Walter Brunner

Regarding the Walter Brunner article, you were right. New article created. Thanks for the suggestion. Chris (talk) 13:38, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Spostamento da lancio a tiro del giavellotto

Avevo ingiustamente accusato Dre Rock qui ed avvertito Vito qui, se leggi già spiego perchè mi sembra una follia. Poi dopo la risposta di Dre, ho letto della tua motivazione, ma è senza consenso, tu non puoi capovelgere un'enciclopedia solo perché lo ritieni. Il lemma deve essere quello dell'uso comune non quello etimologicamente giusto (a parte, che enciclopedie vere, vedi link a Treccani che ho messo, manco così la pensano). --Kasper2006 (talk) 13:43, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Io invece ti rispondo qui perché su it.wiki sono bnnato a vita (anche se).

Non hai discusso con la comunità prima di effettuare lo spostamento. Non credi che 8 anni di esistenza del lemma "lancio del giavellotto" potessero meritarlo?
Nello spostare hai giustificato con la dettagliatissima nota "ma priva di fonti", ma non mettere quella del Prof. Paolo Moisè perché quello che dice lui vale quello che dice la FIDAL, la RAI (da 40 anni nelle sue sovraimpressioni).
Non vero che per gli inglesi "i 4 lanci" sono "throw", solo 3 di essi lo sono (i 3 lanci appunto), il peso è "shot".
Io t'ho linkato il lemma Treccani ma ti dico che anche per l'Enciclopedia De Agostini che ho casa è "lancio del giavellotto" (se vuoi posso farti la scansione). Perché queste enciclopedie dovrebbero essere meno precise di Wikipedia?

Continuiamo a discutere, semmai mi viene in mente qualcos'altro, per intanto, al di là del fatto che hai deciso da solo e nessuno (tranne me che non conto), ti si è opposto, una fonte (possibilmente autorevole quanto la mia "Traccani", che però va dall'altra parte), mettila...ma non quella dell'illustre Prof. Paolo Moisè ti prego. ;-) --Kasper2006 (talk) 15:01, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

EDIT Guarda bella: il it:Giavellotto mi dicono sia una it:Lancia (arma), ed una lancia si...lancia. Se il giavellotto fosse stato un "tiro" (e non, come è, una "lancia"), allora si che si tirava. ;-) --Kasper2006 (talk) 15:07, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Purtroppo io non posso scriverti su it.wiki e son costretto a risponderti qui. Anch'io ho una fonte: Enciclopedia dello Sport (2004) di Roberto L. Quercetani Atletica - Le specialità: i lanci ove in basso è testuale «In Italia il lancio del giavellotto esisteva nell'ultima decade del 19° secolo solo come esercizio di precisione» L'argomento "enciclopedico" è appunto ospitato dal sito dell'enciclopedia Treccani, al contrario la tua fonte fa riferimento ad un calendario di gare regionali organizzate dalla FIDAL Lombardia. La stessa FIDAL che tu hai detto non essere affidabile quando parla di "lancio del giavellotto". Insomma la questione non è così semplice, ma se non vuoi prendere in considerazione le mie ragioni, fa nulla. --Kasper2006 (talk) 07:17, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dopo qualche giorno, finalmente un utente di it.wiki (Basilicofresco) è intervenuto nella discussione. Io gli ho risposto così. Ti prego ancora di non sottrarti alla discussione, credimi non c'è niente di male a discutere. ;-) --Kasper2006 (talk) 07:21, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Credo Reference Update & Survey (your opinion requested)

Credo Reference, who generously donated 400 free Credo 250 research accounts to Wikipedia editors over the past two years, has offered to expand the program to include 100 additional reference resources. Credo wants Wikipedia editors to select which resources they want most. So, we put together a quick survey to do that:

Link to Survey (should take between 5-10 minutes): http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/N8FQ6MM

It also asks some basic questions about what you like about the Credo program and what you might want to improve.

At this time only the initial 400 editors have accounts, but even if you do not have an account, you still might want to weigh in on which resources would be most valuable for the community (for example, through WikiProject Resource Exchange).

Also, if you have an account but no longer want to use it, please leave me a note so another editor can take your spot.

If you have any other questions or comments, drop by my talk page or email me at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com. Cheers! Ocaasi^{t | c} 17:38, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Books and Bytes: The Wikipedia Library Newsletter

Books and Bytes

Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2013

by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs)

Greetings Wikipedia Library members! Welcome to the inaugural edition of Books and Bytes, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of Books and Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list. There's lots of news this month for the Wikipedia Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved...

New positions: Sign up to be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Wikipedia Librarian

Wikipedia Loves Libraries: Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted.

New subscription donations: Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis??

New ideas: OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges

News from the library world: Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY

Announcing WikiProject Open: WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions

New ways to get involved: Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration

Read the full newsletter

Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be opt-in only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the Suggestions page. --The Interior 20:18, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Library Survey

As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi^{t | c} 14:59, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Ysogo. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Did Emma Morano die??

Is there a reliable source revealing her death??
Who is now the world's oldest woman?? Georgia guy (talk) 16:30, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Ysogo. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Ysogo. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Message from Jurij Ivaščenko

Ciao Ysogo, ti sono molto grato per queste pagine http://it.wiki.x.io/wiki/Osservatorio_astronomico_di_Andru%C5%A1ivka http://it.wiki.x.io/wiki/253536_Tymchenko tanti saluti a Tocsana, Jurij Ivaščenko