User talk:Yawaraey

A cookie for you!

This cookie is a token of appreciation to the recent edits you've made to Slipknot-related articles. On behalf, of the Slipknot WikiProject, thank you. :) Kevon100 ^Talk! _{If you're ❺❺❺ then I'm ❻❻❻} 01:22, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

September 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Surfin' on a Backbeat. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Muhandes (talk) 11:41, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary for your edits. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. Muhandes (talk) 11:47, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm starting to think there must be a good reason why you remove all those reviews, but since there is no edit summary I can't figure out what it is. I'll probably need to revert my reverts later, please explain the reasoning.--Muhandes (talk) 11:51, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

discussion split moved back here from User talk:Muhandes. Please don't split discussions, it is best to answer where the discussion started.

I removed it because it was from a non-notable source. And i don't usually see any reason to add an edit summary. yawaraey (talk) 13:36, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries help other editors understand what you are doing, and it is good practice to always add something, unless the edit is self-explanatory, even if it is just "not-notable". In fact, when removing content it is almost required. --Muhandes (talk) 13:51, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

For the matter itself, I am not aware of consensus that http://www.laut.de/ is not notable, are these user reviews or a professional review? For firestream I found this archive and indeed these are user ratings and should be avoided. I added it to WP:ALBUM/REVSIT. Have you said something like "not a professional review" in the edit summary, it would have saved me some time. Best regards. --Muhandes (talk) 13:51, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Seether Help?

Do you think you could help out with the Seether articles on here? It needs help from someone like you. Please respond on MY talk page. --How may I serve you? Marshall Williams2 Talk Autographs Contribs 02:04, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, to start off with, the actual Seether article needs a lot of citations. A few of the albums need citations. Some of Seether's song articles are being labeled just post-grunge when all of them really should be post-grunge AND alternative metal. Some of the album articles don't have that much of a variety of reviewers. On this Nine Inch Nails' album article, Broken (EP), the album has several reviewers such as Allmusic, Los Angeles Times, and Rolling Stone.

If the articles looked more like Broken (EP) I think that'd be good. It appears that you have a lot more experience with band articles then I do so it seems like you could help out with this.

(I'm a diehard Seether fan.) Please respond on MY talk page. --How may I serve you? Marshall Williams2 Talk Autographs Contribs 14:42, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, well do you think you could help to any degree? I don't think there's enough info out there for the Seether articles to be like Broken (EP) but I know the articles could be improved more. --How may I serve you? Marshall Williams2 Talk Autographs Contribs 20:52, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Marilyn Manson discography

I really don't want to get into this argument, but regarding this revert, it might be browser specific, but on my browser the extra width is really necessary or the sales split on multiple lines. Just thought you should know. As a matter of taste, I prefer sales and certifications to be in small type, but again, I am not going to get into this, and in fact I am not even going to watch this page. Best regards and happy editing. --Muhandes (talk) 09:58, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Foo Fighters

Given your contributions to One by One (Foo Fighters album), I wanna know if you can take a look at the article now that I've revamped it and nominated for the GA - but some polish might still be needed. Thanks. igordebraga ≠ 01:25, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Can you take a look at Wasting Light as well? Thanks! igordebraga ≠ 05:53, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've reworked Foo Fighters (album) as well, can you take a look at it? Thanks! igordebraga ≠ 13:05, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Seether discography

I responded to your question on Talk:Seether discography. --How may I serve you? Marshall Williams2 Talk Autographs Contribs 01:56, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I responded to your question on Talk:Seether discography. How may I serve you? Marshall Williams2 Talk Sign Contribs 23:31, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Seether...

You may be interested in a talk section I added to Calabe1992's talk page at the bottom, titled "Seether Template". How may I serve you? Marshall Williams2 Talk Sign Contribs 23:48, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There has been a misunderstanding. It is my fault. I must apologise. What I did in the pages of Qotsa and alex turner was a really bad joke. I wanted to see how long before someone would change it. I WILL NOT DO IT AGAIN. BUT: as far as Rubens Barrichello is concerned, I was DEAD SERIOUS. I AM A HUGE FAN. THE CHANGES WERE RIGHT. YOU CAN CHECK THE INDYCARS OFFICIAL WEBSITE FOR CONFIRMATION : http://www.indycar.com/ I WILL NOT FOOL AROUND AGAIN. BUT DONT RE-EDIT MY CHANGES IN THE RUBENS BARRICHELLO PAGE BECAUSE I FOLLOW HIS PROGRESS AND UPDATE THE STATS CAREFULLY. I HOPE THIS WILL END THINGS IN A PEACEFULL WAY. I DONT WANT TO HEAR FROM YOU AGAIN AND I WILL GIVE YOU NO REASON TO HEAR FROM ME. THATS A PROMISE. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME. FAREWELL. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Netoulis (talk • contribs) 20:35, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"Here and Now" (Seether) Confusion

Is "Here and Now" by Seether actually a single now? Because someone put the chart positions of Seether's discography page. I don't know where they got them from because I looked on some of the Billboard pages for Seether and it doesn't show "Here and Now" on there. http://www.billboard.com/#/song/seether/here-and-now/28031276 Also, Seether's official website hasn't said that it has been released as a single yet. I am quite confused. How may I serve you? Marshall Williams2 Talk Sign Contribs 01:05, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well, either way it charted: http://www.billboard.com/news yawaraey (talk) 01:08, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, by the way that was me that added that. yawaraey (talk) 01:18, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

So i guess it's official? yawaraey (talk) 20:30, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not completely sure. I just don't get why the official Seether website hasn't announced it. 74.176.74.84 (talk) 02:02, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm wondering if the chart positions for No Resolution are right since on the "No Res." article differs from the Seether discography. 74.232.93.23 (talk) 18:02, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sale certifications

Hi thanks for adding sale certifications to various Nirvana album articles. I noticed a few recurring issues, though. First, you need to include retrieval dates for all web references. Also, some of the links you provided were unclear, so I removed them. As certifications aren't sales charts, you shouldn't make them a subsection of the chart sections. Some albums don't have very many sales certifications, like Bleach (album), so I moved all that info to the prose; a table is only necessary if you are dealing with a lot of certifications. Also, when adding a reference to an article with an established reference style, your additions should match that style, per WP:CITEVAR. That last bit isn't too hard; you can pretty much just copy a cite used elsewhere on a page and then change the relevant title/author/date/etc. info for the new cite you wish to add. WesleyDodds (talk) 10:37, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deftones

Notice of Dispute resolution discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "Deftones". Thank you. --HrZ (talk) 14:19, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:12, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Yawaraey. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Yawaraey. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Yawaraey. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ants'hillvania for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ants'hillvania is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ants'hillvania until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Eastmain (talk • contribs) 01:53, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Bandmaidstartover.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Bandmaidstartover.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:58, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Bandmaidglory.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Bandmaidglory.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:58, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Bandmaidbubble.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Bandmaidbubble.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:59, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Daydreamingchooseme.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Daydreamingchooseme.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:59, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Formatting links

Hallo - about your user page: rather than [[Pighammer|''Pighammer'']] and [[Face to the Floor|"Face to the Floor"]] it might be simpler to use ''[[Pighammer]]'' and "[[Face to the Floor]]". PamD 13:14, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Billboard Japan

Billboard Japan has the Hot Albums chart and the Top Albums Sales chart. I've noticed you are going around to band articles trimming the table headline to simply "JPN Billboard" and then using/mixing ranks from these two different charts. I'm not versed in Wikipedia guidelines concerning music charts, but I don't think that's appropriate. I was under the impression that Hot Albums was considered the main chart so I can see leaving that as simply "JPN Billboard", but whenever Top Albums is used the table headline should specify it. Also, your most recent edit to Lovebites just duplicated the Top Singles Sales ranking which was already there. Xfansd (talk) 00:55, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, those example you linked are fine in my opinion. Only other thing is that Lovebites' first two live albums currently use Top Albums ranks but the third uses Hot Albums. So we have to either switch the third to its Top rank and change the headline title, or add another row for their Hot ranks. Xfansd (talk) 01:28, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rammstein

http://ram.wiki.net/wiki/Rammstein_Demo_Tapes_(Prototype)

https://www.google.com/search?q=rammstein+demos+1994+release+date&rlz=1CDGOYI_enDK932DK933&hl=da&sxsrf=AOaemvK3svsX4p2Ti2NrzEP6gXhJ1FhQEw%3A1640437833308&ei=SRjHYdCaEo2Hxc8Pt4eKgAc&oq=rammstein+d&gs_lcp=ChNtb2JpbGUtZ3dzLXdpei1zZXJwEAEYADIECCMQJzIECCMQJzIECCMQJzIFCC4QgAQyBQguEIAEMgUIABCABDIFCAAQgAQyBQgAEIAEOgcIIxCwAxAnOgcIABBHELADOgoILhDIAxCwAxBDOgQILhBDSgUIOBIBMUoECEEYAFD8EliHFWDTJWgBcAF4AIABmQOIAd4EkgEHMC4xLjQtMZgBAKABAcgBEcABAQ&sclient=mobile-gws-wiz-serp

https://www.google.com/search?sa=X&rlz=1CDGOYI_enDK932DK933&hl=da&biw=375&bih=553&sxsrf=AOaemvIMe0sBnttRmyUF_0JNfkPHfTT05w:1640437323502&q=rammstein+mix+2001&stick=H4sIAAAAAAAAAONgFuLQz9U3MEvJjlfiArEyjCszDLK1xLOTrfRzS4szk_UTi0oyi0usEnOSSnOLF7EKFSXm5haXpGbmKeRmVigYGRgYTmBjBADqiYX3SQAAAA&lei=dxbHYfLZOuqPxc8P0-y0uAE

https://www.google.com/search?q=rammstein+album&rlz=1CDGOYI_enDK932DK933&hl=da&biw=375&bih=553&sxsrf=AOaemvIMe0sBnttRmyUF_0JNfkPHfTT05w%3A1640437323502&ei=SxbHYe_9HfiOxc8PnumVsAY&oq=rammstein+a&gs_lcp=ChNtb2JpbGUtZ3dzLXdpei1zZXJwEAEYAjIECCMQJzIICC4QgAQQ1AIyBQgAEIAEMgUIABCABDIFCAAQgAQyBQgAEIAEMgUIABCABDIFCAAQywE6BggAEBYQHjoFCCEQoAE6BQguEIAEOgQILhBDOgcILhCxAxBDOgcIIxCwAhAnOgcILhCxAxANOgQILhANOgQIABANOggIABAWEAoQHkoECEEYAFCcBljjJWDINGgEcAF4AIABgQOIAesSkgEIMC4xMy4xLjGYAQCgAQHAAQE&sclient=mobile-gws-wiz-serp

https://www.discogs.com/release/1566300-Rammstein-Herzeleid-Demos-93-94

(“1994-12-31: Thüringen Klubhaus, Saalfeld, Germany”) and (“Demos 1994”) it’s one of the first albums from Rammstein and (“Demos 1994”) this was released before Rammstein’s first album (“1994-12-31: Thüringen Klubhaus, Saalfeld, Germany”).

And also some links and websites with some album’s, song’s and ep’s from The German band Rammstein.

You’re welcome Merry Christmas for you and a happy new year. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.49.44.242 (talk) 13:27, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

about In My Darkest Hour by Megadeth

Hi there! Thank you very much for all your efforts in editing Band-Maid related articles. (I'm very happy because I'm a Japanese Band-Maid fan.) By the way, I've seen you editing hard rock and heavy metal related articles several times. If so, you know "In My Darkest Hour" by Megadeth. I found out that a draft article for this song (Draft:In My Darkest Hour) was being created in December 2021 and made some simple edits like adding categories and a music video. I was surprised to learn that the article for this song was not created and still remains a draft article because I thought it was one of their famous songs. However, since I'm Japanese and not a native English speaker, I'm having trouble figuring out how to edit it (That's why I use the DeepL Translator). I think I should move the draft article for this song to mainspace. Would you like to participate in editing it if you don't have problem? --Hatto (talk) 04:56, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rammstein

Hi there! What makes a band an associated act? I'm really curious as I can not see why Emigrate and Lindemann can not be considered as that. WolfmanFP (talk) 14:32, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deftones

Hi Yawaraey. Saturday Night Wrist, ... While critically acclaimed. Koi No Yokan (2012) and Gore (2016) ... were released to critical acclaim. WP:MOSLEAD: Apart from basic facts, significant information should not appear in the lead if it is not covered in the remainder of the article. --Oroborvs (talk) 14:38, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not vandalism

...just chatty and unverified. Drmies (talk) 23:09, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe it's not vandalism, but the only source is a private Instagram account with a profile picture featuring Blaze Bayley and a woman. yawaraey (talk) 23:13, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Use of Metal Kingdom as a source

Hello Yawaraey👍! I noticed that you removed the Metal Kingdom reference on Dead Memories. I would like to say that I agree with your edit and I will not revert it, as you can see through my edit summary here. You said it is "user generated" and "unreliable". I agree with that statement, and I think I should inform you that the same website (Metal Kingdom) has been used as a reference for several articles, by other users, but I can't do anything about this, because anything I do will be labeled simply as "genre warring" even though I'm right. I ask you, politely, if you can take a look at the following pages: Killpop, Nero Forte, Demanufacture, As Ugly as They Wanna Be, Danzig 4... and believe it, there are more pages! but i can't remember them all. Please, take a look! SpaceHelmetX1 (talk) 04:02, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@SpaceHelmetX1 I have removed Metal Kingdom from the two Slipknot articles you presented to me, but I don't want to go through every article, I will add a request to add it to Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources later today. If you scroll down on the pages for "Dead Memories", "Killpop", and "Nero Forte", you can see that they were all added by different users. yawaraey (talk) 11:59, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the support! There was a pandemic of Metal Kingdom sources being provided, but now it seems that everyone has understood that it is unreliable and therefore should not be used. On Killpop and Nero Forte I wasn't the user responsible for it's addition. I will never again use the Metal Kingdom as a source, and when I see it being used I will remove it. SpaceHelmetX1 (talk) 16:16, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Metal Storm citation

What's your opinion about Metal Storm website and its use as a source? Metal Storm is considered reliable per WP:MUSICRS, but I think only some reviews are considered reliable, cause per WP:MUSICRS "Only staff review from 2009 onward are usable, do not use guest reviews". Metal Storm has been used many times, even being used alongside Metal Kingdom, as you can see here. Similar to Metal Kingdom, its genres are clearly user generated, the album reviews were not used, but only the genres on the main page like this. In my opinion, these genres work like those in the Allmusic sidebar. We can see that such genres were repeated for all the group's albums on the website. What can I do about it? Am I wrong? SpaceHelmetX1 (talk) 02:07, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@SpaceHelmetX1 What you can do is try to get it added to the list of unreliable sources with a note that it should only be used for certain things, like what you stated above. You can add a request here. yawaraey (talk) 02:31, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Yawaraey Thanks! I will try to do this

SpaceHelmetX1 (talk) 03:11, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deftones (album)

Thank you for adding the quote. I apologize for missing that; the author of the article uses both "hard rock" and "hard-rock" interchangeably, and my CTRL+F search of the former returned only the result unrelated to the self-titled record. dannymusiceditor ^oops 06:51, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]