User talk:YarthEnt

Hello YarthEnt. You used the {{Help me}} tag but did not ask a question. Please write out your question and replace the {{Help me}} tag when you are done, and someone will be along to help. Alternatively, you can ask your question at the Teahouse, the help desk, or join Wikipedia's Live Help channel on IRC to get real-time assistance.

Welcoming new users

Hi YarthEnt,

I notice you've been welcoming a lot of new users recently (which is nice). Some of these users however haven't made any edits yet. The first line of the welcome message says "thank you for your contributions" which could cause confusion if they've haven't made any yet. May I kindly suggest waiting until a user has made an edit (and checking to see if it's suitable) before posting the welcome message.

Thanks.

Princess Persnickety (talk) 09:29, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much from: RichardABC.Lane — Preceding unsigned comment added by RichardABC.Lane (talk • contribs) 14:19, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sock block

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:13, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request for unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

YarthEnt (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

sorry but I don't use multiple account. but my any mistake please forget me. I am always follow Wikipedia's rules so please unblock me. YarthEnt (talk) 17:19, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser evidence shows Likely and combined with your editing pattern, I concur with the block. Yamla (talk) 17:27, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

YarthEnt (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please trust me I don't use another account and you claim I am anaislam I am not.If It's pattern has the same that I can't be that me YarthEnt (talk) 17:34, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

If not sockpuppetry, it is meatpuppetry; this being a checkuser block with technical evidence to support it, this is not in doubt. 331dot (talk) 23:18, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I don't claim you are Ananislam; you are tagged as a suspected sock of Ananislam. The accounts that I've linked you to are Zoyahssn (who also welcomed new users from the same IP range and uncommon device that matches yours) and Beingmai, an account you were editing from on the same IP minutes before editing from this one. Green and black is such a classic combination, don't you agree?-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:25, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

YarthEnt (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Zoyahssn is my cousin sister so her ip range is same. and my edits are same it's a coincident.YarthEnt (talk) 03:59, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

That's highly unlikely. You would stand a better chance of being unblocked, if you were honest with what you are doing. A CU can confirmed with technical evidence that you were a sock. RickinBaltimore (talk) 16:40, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

YarthEnt (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have no reason for say but I am honest in my life but you don't trust me ok so I am sorry for all that you claim. I studied all the rules of Wikipedia yesterday, but I did not know why I was blocked. But maybe I had another mistake so it was blocked but I beg your pardon please forgive me. Please Unblock my account YarthEnt (talk) 04:05, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:45, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

YarthEnt (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

YarthEnter (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Decline reason:

(duplicate declined, too) This is not a user name block. It is a block for sockpuppetry. You are not eligible for unblocking. To be eligible for a global rename, the . . . user is not seeking the rename to conceal or obfuscate bad conduct. And renaming a sock puppet would be obfuscatory. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:49, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]