Jump to content

User talk:Writer1977

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome

[edit]
Hello, Writer1977, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Need help?

How you can help:

Additional tips...

Writer1977, good luck, and have fun. – Aboutmovies (talk) 10:58, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jeffrey Marsh (March 18)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment they left was:
His own videos should not be used as references - they are BY him not ABOUT him. IMDB and Twitter are not allowed as sources. For criteria for notability, see WP:CREATIVE.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
LaMona (talk) 17:54, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! Writer1977, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! LaMona (talk) 17:54, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

[edit]

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Scott Bradlee  with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 22:58, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jeffrey Marsh (March 27)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
 The comment they left was:
Still questionable for WP:ENTERTAINER and will need any further available amount of in-depth third-party news sources overall to have solid notability.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 05:50, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

PMJ Logo upload

[edit]

Writer1977, I have a couple of concerns about the logo you've uploaded. (File:Scott_Bradlee's_Postmodern_Jukebox_logo_(2016).png) For starters you are representing that the logo is your own work and you are licensing the copy to CC-BY-SA. With this statement you are holding yourself out as the copyright owner. This can get complicated on the Wikipedia, these are generally uploaded under Fair Use, on the Wikipedia, rather than on the Commons. Second, I'm not seeing where this logo is in use. Wikimedia is very serious about copyright, if a reviewer encounters content with problematic releases, the standard protocol is to delete.

I'm going to revert to the logo taken from the web-page that I previously uploaded until we have ironed this out. My version is properly uploaded and will be deleted if it is not connected to the article. Do you work for PMJ in some capacity? 009o9 (talk) 00:00, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi User009o0 -- first of all, thanks for your help in guiding me through this. I'm still relatively new to Wikipedia editing and I'm trying to do my best to read everything and learn all correct policies. You've been doing some great work to make the PMJ page much stronger, which is awesome. I decided to practice my Wiki skills by creating the PMJ page (as a breakout page from Scott Bradlee's page), when I noticed that all the PMJ info had been bunched together under his personal page. Yes, you're 100% correct... this logo should've been uploaded via Fair Use. I've been perusing Wiki's help pages to try to figure out how to check that option and I still can't quite figure it out. Do you have a moment to guide me through how to upload a photo via Fair Use on Wiki? (or, how I can change the existing upload to indicate Fair Use?... I'm also fine with just deleting it). I would love to learn this skill, in order to get better. In terms of your second question, it seems that PMJ has been using this logo everywhere lately, including at the start of almost every new video that they post each week. It's on their website, here: (http://postmodernjukebox.com/post/craigslist/) and I found the copy that I used, here: (http://www.allmusic.com/artist/scott-bradlees-postmodern-jukebox-mn0003405394/songs) just through Google Image Search ... personally, I like the art deco look to it, which is why I uploaded it. I suppose it doesn't matter too much which one is used - it was just a matter of preference. And yes, the logo you used is the one at the top of their website. Lastly, I do not work for PMJ... I only recently discovered them and was interested in learning more about them which is how I found Scott's page. Do you have any connection?

Writer1977 (talk) 20:01, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Writer1977. To use a logo under Fair Use, it has to be the identifying image for the subject, it looks to me like the image on AllMusic is an old one. Additionally, the WikiCommons won't accept any copyright restricted images, Fair Use images have to be uploaded to Wikipedia instead, require an explanation and will undergo scrutiny.
I fixed up the American Idol section, I had noticed that the Bradlee quote from Yahoo! Music had already been chopped up. Additionally, we need to have references for the facts that we add to the article. The problem is that we don't want to have an ugly maintenance banner added to the top of the article, so if we don't have an independent reference, it's usually best to make a note on the talk page and wait for referencing to come about. (Opps, I just realized, those are not your edits.)
I'm not connected with the band, however I do write professionally. If (and or) when I become closely affiliated, I will state the relationship on the article's talk page.
My pleasure to work with you on this, we should discuss article on its talk page. I am aware of other interested editors. 009o9 (talk) 07:53, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
P.S. When referencing, be sure to get the article's date and the author, Internet references have a habit of disappearing in a short amount of time. I also like creating Archive URLs using the Wayback Machine and provide them in the citation when possible.009o9 (talk) 08:01, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Jeffrey-Marsh-how-to-be-you.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Jeffrey-Marsh-how-to-be-you.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Majora (talk) 21:37, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Thanks -- I'm still learning the rules of image use. I'll upload a photo of the subject that I took and own the rights to." Writer1977 (talk) 04:24, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Jeffrey-Marsh-how-to-be-you.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jeffrey-Marsh-how-to-be-you.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:42, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Jeffrey Marsh has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Jeffrey Marsh. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 03:04, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Writer1977 (talk) 21:41, 15 October 2016 (UTC) Hey Robert McClenon[reply]

Can you advise how to proceed with disambiguation?

http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Draft:Jeffrey_Marsh

Try what I have done. Robert McClenon (talk) 22:17, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jeffrey Marsh (activist) has been accepted

[edit]
Jeffrey Marsh (activist), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Chris Troutman (talk) 22:01, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Project

[edit]

I would like to ask you a few things about getting a Wikipedia page on that complies with all Wikipedia policies. My email dsainad at gmail dot com 154.122.46.196 (talk) 06:02, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Lington sax.jpg

[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Lington sax.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. XXN, 23:45, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Lington performance.jpg

[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Lington performance.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. XXN, 23:46, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Michael Lington performs with Barry Manilow.png

[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Michael Lington performs with Barry Manilow.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. XXN, 23:46, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:TRC GIBTY cover RGB.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TRC GIBTY cover RGB.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Give It Back to You (May 27)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Legacypac was:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Give It Back to You instead.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Already well covered on the band page. Go improve that page, which this title is already a redirect to
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Legacypac (talk) 09:12, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Silver Lining.jpeg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Silver Lining.jpeg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 18:07, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:OOTB500.png

[edit]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:20, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

[edit]

Copyright problem icon Your addition to Out Of The Blues (Boz Scaggs album) has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:28, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:A Fool To Care - Boz Scaggs.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:A Fool To Care - Boz Scaggs.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Also:

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:03, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Castlecomer album cover (Oct. 2018).jpg

[edit]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:09, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Castlecomer (Band).jpg

[edit]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:13, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Castlecome debut album.jpg

[edit]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 21:10, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Look Now.jpg

[edit]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 00:00, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Castlecomer (band) for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Castlecomer (band) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Castlecomer (band) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 03:44, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:A Fool To Care - Boz Scaggs.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:A Fool To Care - Boz Scaggs.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:22, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Writer1977. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Castlecome debut album.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Castlecome debut album.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:29, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Africa Speaks (Santana album)) has been reviewed!

[edit]

Thanks for creating Africa Speaks (Santana album).

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thanks for starting the article on "Africa Speaks" by Santana.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 12:30, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of File:Maggie-Koerner.jpg

[edit]

The page File:Maggie-Koerner.jpg has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appeared to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:50, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

[edit]

Information icon Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Travon Free. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. —Bagumba (talk) 03:05, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The source didnt observe that the works were "similar".—Bagumba (talk) 03:07, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hi Writer1977! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Travon Free that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. —Bagumba (talk) 03:08, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "http://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Writer1977&oldid=1076536896"