Jump to content

User talk:Woohookitty/Archive13

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


AfD nomination of This Love You Breathe

An article that you have been involved in editing, This Love You Breathe, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/This Love You Breathe. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. QuestionOfAnarchy (talk) 00:55, 7 March 2009 (UTC)


Maharana Fateh Singh

Thank you :)

Gorkhali (talk) 05:01, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Requesting Danny Noriega edit

Hi, could you please read Danny Noriega's talk page on request edits to adding two categories on a protected redirect page. --ApprenticeFan Messages Work 16:10, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Nutz

I am doing some research for a new article on Truck Nutz and this page showed up. You had deleted the article before, and it is complete junk now. I don't know what to do, but would you please delete it again? TharsHammar (talk) 18:25, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost — 9 March 2009

This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 10, which includes these articles:

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 01:37, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks.

It may not seem so, but I really do try to catch those wikilinks I create that point to disambiguation pages. Thank you very much for catching so many of the misses.sinneed (talk) 06:08, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Hello

Hello , r u there, now? Hamprey (talk) 11:42, 13 March 2009 (UTC) I wanna know how to delete articles in wikibin n wikirage as they go against the truth Hamprey (talk) 11:43, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Bobbi Miller-Moro

Is up for deletion. --Tom 17:37, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Red Barnstar of Courage

You are hereby awarded the Red Barnstar of Courage four years of all-around editing awesomeness. bd2412 T 07:42, 16 March 2009 (UTC)


The Wikipedia Signpost  — 16 March 2009

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 00:36, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Abbas Husain

An article that you have been involved in editing, Abbas Husain, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abbas Husain. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Drmies (talk) 04:09, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Darling (ESTK song)

An article that you have been involved in editing, Darling (ESTK song), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darling (ESTK song). Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. QuestionOfAnarchy (talk) 11:46, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Artistic Tributes to Rachel Corrie nominated for Wikipedia Articles for deletion Artistic Tributes to Rachel Corrie

Artistic Tributes to Rachel Corrie page nominated for Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Artistic Tributes to Rachel Corrie can I have your opinions for the deletion and help on the article. Kasaalan (talk) 00:55, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Redirects

Yes. Sorry, just getting tired of this endless drama :) Fritzpoll (talk) 10:57, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Billy Joel single template

Hello! I have contacted you because you have heavily contributed to the Billy Joel template. A discussion has been started, by me, about a template made solely for Joel's singles. The discussion is here, and your input it appreciated. Feel free to send other people a message, asking for their input. Thank you! CarpetCrawler (talk) 20:48, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 23 March 2009

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 04:52, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Roma Ostiense railway station

Thanks for helping me finish the article, it looks great, I am really happy with the translation.--Alex Barrow (talk) 13:28, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:UtahSchoolDistrict

Template:UtahSchoolDistrict has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Gr0ff (talk) 18:31, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Dear

You have deleted again “Eagle’s wing “magazine. This history it’s about two years going on without any valid reason. This magazine represents a big Albanian community, in need, which is almost equal with Kosovo population, represents even the Albanian communities in Kosovo, Montenegro, Macedonia and USA. This is the unique magazine that is used as a reference source for the problems of these communities. And it has more reason to be displayed in the pages of your encyclopedia than being deleted. It makes favors to you encyclopedia. These reasons, yesterday, on 26 March were presented to the administrator below: http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/User:Future_Perfect_at_Sunrise, and he agreed that the article could be included again in the pages of the encyclopedia. You can see this even in the page of this administrator. We will put again the material in your pages and we hope to find your support. Regarding the references sources we will try to fulfill them, following your conditions. Again I repeat you that this is an article widely read and it does a favor to your encyclopedia. Respectfully Xanxari en. March 27, 2009 --Xanxari en. (talk) 11:16, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Alexis Grace (American singer)

A tag has been placed on Alexis Grace (American singer), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ApprenticeFan talk contribs 07:24, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

David Shulman edit

I've reverted your edit. Shulman's bilingualism and mastery of those languages is listed both in his curriculum, and in many articles, including that of T.S. Subramanian, cited on the page. Regards Nishidani (talk) 09:14, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 30 March 2009

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 20:51, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Recent deaths

Hi, please read Talk:Deaths in 2009#Don't remove a month before it's over before moving pages. Thanks, WWGB (talk) 07:00, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

?

Why did you redirect Danes in the Infobox of the Battle of Finnburg to the Nazi Occupation of Denmark. It doesn’t make any sense.Pindanl (talk) 10:07, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Category:Companies bankrupted during the Late 2000s Recession

I moved the discussion from WP:CFD/S to Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2009 April 3. Thanks, –Black Falcon (Talk) 18:26, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Hi. Sorry about the incorrect American wikilinks. I checked the format you used, and will try to not repeat that (again). Best regards. --OliverTwisted (Talk) (Stuff) 07:37, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

Serious violation of WP:NPA

Hi Woohookitty. I'd like to report a serious violation of WP:NPA, which is going on in this discussion page. I come to you because I've seen you had some involvement in other conflicts relating Gibraltar articles. As you may know, this case follows a long history of British editors who do not allow any Spanish users to participate in the edition of any Gibraltar articles and is now going too far with insults like utter dick from user:Justin A Kuntz, just because he is losing a debate. Please stop this person from abusing other editors, his behaviour is unacceptable. Thank you in advance. --Té y kriptonita (talk) 14:26, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Re above and Proboscis Monkey

Well, what a weird person above. British are like that. They don't like to be educated that their history is mainly lies, boast and propaganda. Anyway- I notice some edits on proboscis monkey- I was just wondering if you had anything to add or contribute- as some of your edits do not quite seem to make sense- maybe its' my reading. Anyway- not angry or protecting my 'baby':- more than happy to have extra help- please discuss on the talk page of proboscis monkey. PS- I would keep going with the Gibraltar articles just to annoy the silly people. Viva campaña de la verdad "jebel Tarik"!Starstylers (talk) 18:04, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 6 April 2009

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 20:00, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Barnstar

The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
If I see that someone has fixed an ambiguous link, I'm almost 100% sure of which name I'll see after it! JD554 (talk) 11:38, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Alan de Freitas

An article that you have been involved in editing, Alan de Freitas, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alan de Freitas. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. CyberGhostface (talk) 16:11, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

HI

I Am a new user asking for help editing wikiapeda can you help me find an admin to help me out. —Preceding unsigned comment added by ToMenyTVs (talk • contribs) 18:01, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Sorry

I can't imagine what I was thinking, reverting your edit to William Charles Fahie; my only excuse is tiredness! Please accept my apology. Shem (talk) 09:12, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 13 April 2009

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 17:10, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Hey there

As an admin and one of the more respected wikipedians on the American Idol discussion pages, I would appreciate it if you could offer your opinion on this if you get a chance, regardless whether you agree or disagree with me. :) MarkMc1990 (talk) 20:42, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Category:Georgia (U.S state) government navigational boxes

I notice that this category you created is unpopulated (empty). In other words, no Wikipedia pages belong to it. If it remains unpopulated for four days, it may be deleted without discussion, in accordance with Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#C1. I'm notifying you in case you wish to (re-)populate it by adding [[Category:Georgia (U.S state) government navigational boxes]] to pages that belong in it.

I tagged the category. This will not, in itself, cause the category to be deleted. It serves to document (in the page history) that the category was empty at the time of tagging and also to alert other watchers that the category is in jeopardy. You are welcome to remove the tag if you wish. However, removing the tag will not prevent deletion of the category if it remains empty.

If you created the category in error, or it is no longer needed, you can speed up the deletion process by tagging it with {{db-author}}.

I am a human being, not a bot, so you can contact me if you have questions about this. Best regards, --Stepheng3 (talk) 04:14, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Thank you from qvidproqvo

Thank you for the disambiguation edits, Woohoo. Cheers. --Qvidproqvo (talk) 11:47, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Thank You Again

I don't know how you do it. I start a page and in my sloppy way put in ambiguous links like [[Greek]], then I come back soon after and find you have fixed them. There is something really comforting and reassuring to see that Woohookitty has taken a look at the article and fixed it up. But maybe you make us other editors lazy? Thank you so much, you are doing a great job. Aymatth2 (talk) 00:12, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Now I have to find an article where I can insert: ABC is an Greek/Italian punk rock group from Halifax. :~) Aymatth2 (talk) 18:57, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

When prodding

Just a friendly reminder to use an edit summary when proposing deletion for an article. Edit summary usage is always good, but it is especially important that edit summaries are used when proposing deletion. The reason for this is that articles proposed for deletion that later have the {{prod}} tag removed should not be proposed for deletion again, but rather sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. The only easy way to check if an article was previously proposed for deletion is to look at the edit history and the edit summaries people have left before. Thanks! Hiding T 10:22, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Theodore Dreiser

Thanks for fixing his template, I didn't know how to.Zigzig20s (talk) 19:57, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

move required

Hi dear, we require an admins help,

please have a look at this: Talk:Jhelum (city).

Brainlara73 (talk) 23:50, 20 April 2009 (UTC)



--75.154.186.241 (talk) 23:58, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:Lists of newspapers in South America

Thanks for disambiguating my article on Susan B. Neuman. As a "newbie" to Wikipedia writing, I can use all the help I can get! JourneyWomanSLP--JourneyWomanSLP (talk) 16:48, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

Template:Lists of newspapers in South America has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Neelix (talk) 18:58, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Rez dog

Thanks for the disambig over at the Rez dog article. There's something very amusing about the thought of Woohookitty fixing the Rez dog article. Cheers, Wikidemon (talk) 11:56, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

Mumbai

Request to allow edits on article Mumbai, which have been blocked by user YellowDog. Tried YellowDog's page but seems the user is not longer listed.

Please see discussion on Mumbai page http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Talk:Mumbai#Edits_.3F —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ninadhardikar (talk • contribs) 17:01, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 27 April 2009

Delivered by SoxBot II (talk) at 05:04, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Krahu i shqiponjës

Dear,

You are tiring us with the deletion of “Eagle’s wing” magazine from your encyclopedia. Your action seems intentional because you could have let enough time to the other collaborators of the encyclopedia to edit the article, as you do with other articles that can be firstly incomplete but then they become complete. There are tens incomplete articles in the encyclopedia and nobody has deleted them. We are astonished by your unfair behavior.

Best regards

--Xanxari en. (talk) 14:23, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Notification (template talk restarting)

I thought it might at best if I notify you this, (Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion/Log/2009_March_10#Talk_page_restarting) before things get out of control. Of course the preview shown below is the proposal, however, it is only a working draft not the final, they are still a lot of things requiring wikiuser help.

The first 1 was just the idea draft. Second one was the recent draft. None of them are close to the complete proposal.


Editing Barnstar

100,000 Edits
I, Bugboy52.4, award you for reaching 100,000 edits according to the List of Wikipedians by number of edits generated 11:45 pm, 24 February 2009. Keep up the good work!________________________________________________________________

Talk:Troy Rusnack#Notability

I've removed the proposed deletion tag on the article; please read the reason on the talk page linked. The fact that a musician keeps his seasonal "day job" does not eliminate his notability. There are numerous reliable sources in the article attesting to Rusnack's notability. In particular, he has toured nationally. By the way, please also use the notification tag as a courtesy. Bearian (talk) 18:32, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Need your help

Hi! Hope you are still on line. Could you please move back the article Kendō to Kendo? It was my mistake and I am asked to move back. Purrsonally thank you. Oda Mari (talk) 05:08, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

Canned (tv series)

Hi, I have converted your speedy to a WP:PROD, as I do not see how this article meets any of the WP:CSD criteria. decltype (talk) 09:13, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

American Idol Contestants

Hi, I was wondering why did you redirected the articles I wroted because they didn't have enough notabillity. The only fact of being part of American Idol and reaching the Top 36 makes them notable. They also have done important things. Please don`t do it again. Facha93 (talk) 22:32, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Carina Axelsson entry

Hi - saw you edited this page. This page was nominated for deletion; it seemed to me that consensus wasn't really reached but the decision was to keep. I can't see that the girlfriend of one of thousands of minor German princelings is notable; the books that she wrote were vanity press published and are carried by fewer than 12 libraries world-wide. If you check the talk page, one of the guys who voted "keep" actually changed his mind. At any rate, what are your thoughts about re-nominating this one for deletion? —Preceding unsigned comment added by ProperlyRaised (talk • contribs) 23:37, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

The reason behind this edit?

Hi. Why would you change "Portuguese" to "Portuguese People" with this edit? Personally I don't believe "Portuguese" should be linked at all in the article, but I can find no reason for associating "Cod Cakes" with "Portuguese People".  HWV258  07:05, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

AI

I had a thought - mentioned it in a reply to you on my talk page Fritzpoll (talk) 07:21, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Native American history

Why did you remove the three categories from Half-Breed Tract? Your comment said they were red, but I don't see that re-inserting them. Any explanation would be useful. • Freechild'sup? 11:23, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the explanation - I appreciate it. • Freechild'sup? 16:29, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 11 May 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 22:38, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Abramites hypeselontois

I saw your recent change to the marbled headstander article and I wanted to thank you. That was a good catch. I'm guessing the original link eiter led to a disambiguation page, or to a page on amazon.com. Either way, that must've led to confusion. This is still a very new article, and I was oping I could get some feedback on it. You must've read some of it, so what do you think? Good? Bad? Drew Smith What I've done 05:33, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 18 May 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 13:49, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Cuisine of Singapore

Please set protection on Cuisine of Singapore, there is a vandal keep removing section, adding alot foods in there wihtout ref. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.15.97.88 (talk) 15:21, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Texas country music groups

I have nominated Category:Texas country music groups (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for renaming to Category:Country music groups from Texas (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 20:46, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

Spell-checking other languages

Dear User:Woohookitty, Could you please help us identifiying unsuitable material in the article that you propose for deletion? Or is it completely unsuitable and we should forget? I can see some original work on it... but we can rewrite it. With regards, --JosebaAbaitua (talk) 07:34, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Emulator

About half of your edits for "emulation" are incorrect. Except for the topics that talk about a video game, the intended sense is (currently) best matched by Emulator Tedickey (talk) 11:20, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hi, can you please review your recent edits. They seem to be adding (Ctrl-click)"> in many strange places. WWGB (talk) 05:33, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

wikEd problem: Ctrl-click

Hi Woohookitty,

please could you report the browser name and version (or a rough estimate of your latest update) that you have used for the Ctrl-click edits as well as other gadgets you have checked under User talk:Cacycle/wikEd#Very odd Ctrl-click issue.

Thanks in advance, Cacycle (talk) 19:36, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 25 May 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 04:25, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of List of Wait Wait... Don't Tell Me! guests (2005)

An editor has nominated List of Wait Wait... Don't Tell Me! guests (2005), an article similar to one which you have edited, for deletion. Opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns.HughGRex (talk) 11:26, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

Just wanted to say thanks for disambiguating the organ in those articles on Bruckner's sacred choral works. I'll keep the proper link in mind for the articles on the D minor Mass and the Missa Solemnis in B-flat minor. James470 (talk) 00:55, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

Krahu i shqiponjës

User:Woohookitty,

Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia!

Is it really an encyclopedia of free thought which supports advanced developments, the fair and honest issues, which expresses itself against genocides and vandalism?! I don’t think when it has such conspiratorial administrators! With such administrators it seems as Encyclopedia- dictatorship which supports only the unfair strong persons! Why don’t you delete hundreds of articles with two rows that you have in your encyclopedia and instead you deal so much with the article “Eagle’s wing”? You have to become fair and honest judgers and let the article “Eagle’s wing” in your encyclopedia and so the others can have the possibility to judge and edit its content. Many friends of the Cultural Community of Chameria and I are disgusted by this massacre against free thought practiced at Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia! I hope you will give up having such attitudes.

--Xanxari en. (talk) 10:54, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

Krahu i shqiponjës

You can read the article at the address below:

http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/User:Xanxari_en./Krahu_i_shqiponj%C3%ABs

And if you are careful, you will notice that there are new sources and references of the most reliable. I don’t know what can be more reliable than the president of the Parliament of a country (Pjetër Arbnori}) and the National Library of a country?! There are photos there and documents (facsimile):

http://www.shefkihysa.com/al/xhaferri.html

which prove that Albanian state is our collaborator. See them and suggest us what other reliable sources can we find?!

--Xanxari en. (talk) 12:33, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

Jared Leto

You know that some might see your disambiguation work as an endorsement of the sentence you are fixing. Let's not upset Jared Leto, please :P Law type! snype? 10:22, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Disambiguator userbox

Greetings, I created a userbox that you may want to display:

This user is in the Disambiguator Hall of Fame.

J04n(talk page) 14:52, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 1 June 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 23:16, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Error with your 'popup' tool

Hi, you made an edit on the Audi S and RS models article (05.59, 2 June 2009), but I had to undo it - because the edit you changed it to was completely the wrong context. Perhaps you would like to check the settings of your popup tool, and revert any other automotive articles which were changed. Kind regards. 78.32.143.113 (talk) 11:22, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Deletion of content in Rob_Shepherd entry

http://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Rob_Shepherd&action=history

Hi. On May 27 you undid additions I had made to this page: your action was on the grounds that two entries for two different people sharing the same name were confusing and you suggested another page should be started to say what I had to say. But how do I start a separate entry with the same name as the existing entry?

In practice: there are two people with the same name who've both had UK media careers and who should not be confused with each other and have the right to equal prominence within Wikipedia. Is it possible to have two entries with the same name? If not, surely there need to be two entries on the same page, otherwise how would one resolve who has primary title to their own name?

Be grateful for your advice.

Robertjshepherd (talk) 09:28, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

XXXtra Manish

If you're still around, this article that you recently deleted is back with no changes that I can see. t'shael mindmeld 11:41, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Scouts Royale Brotherhood

I cleaned up the article and added some additional information. I took off the various header messages including the proposed delete. Please let me know your opinion of the upgraded article. Disclaimer: I'm a brother of the USA fraternity whose Filipino equivalent is responsible for founding SRB, so I have some vested interest, but hopefully, I've kept a NPOV.Naraht (talk) 13:43, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

While my membership is related, 99.99% of the brothers in Alpha Phi Omega-USA have no idea who Scouts Royale Brotherhood is, the cultures between the USA and Philippines fraternities are *significant*. I'm on both the National "International Relations Committee" and the National "History and Archives Committee" which adds up to being an Alpha Phi Omega geek. :).
The Alpha Phi Omega page actually has its purpose (which is almost identical) in paragraph three in the header. I think it might not be so bad on Scouts Royale Brotherhood if it weren't an H2 header. If I could move it down to H3, do you have a suggestion for what header might include them all? Also, I *think* it is an exact quote, but unfortunately most of the www.srb-lfs.org site requires logging in. I'm going to go ask on a Philippino Fraternity webboard that I'm on to see if I can get something.Naraht (talk) 15:20, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
I think we're pretty much agreed on the destination, I just have to figure out how to get there. Do you want to put one of the header templates back then? Also, any idea for a replacement section Title at the H2 level, so I can push it down to H3?Naraht (talk) 15:45, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
Sorry, one of those things that get put up at the top of the article saying that it needs something like to be proofread or redone for NPOV.
Whoops, put the response oon my page. I decided on "Standards" as the H2.Naraht (talk) 15:52, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
Goals may be OK, but I'm looking for something wider that might cover everything from purpose to official flower (if they have one).
I'll keep an eye on it anyway. The pages for the Fraternities in the Philippines get an incredible number of edits from brothers who don't have english as their first language and only care about their own fraternity as opposed to the rest of Wikipedia. I'm the primary editor on List of fraternities and sororities in the Philippines, you should see some of the edits...
At least for most of them, their first language is english. I may end up learning Tagalog to understand some the comments/vandalism.

Would you be interested in an e-mail interview?

endulge my trespassing on your time. I'm a university student at Seoul National University, and I'm currently working on a research project on Wikipedia. Right now I am concentrating on understanding the 'Consensus' principle, and I realized that here statistical numbers or explicit talks would leave me without any clue... unless I first get a picture of the whole thing. So I'm searching for live voices, for accounts of active users.

I see you are highly active in Wikipedia, so I thought your experience and opinions would be a great help. Would you by any chance care for an email interview? You just have to answer several questions, but it will be of tremendous meaning for me. If you have the time, please contact me on my user talk page and I'll mail you the questions.

Thanks for reading.

Little Sheepherd (talk) 02:54, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

General Notability Guidelines for entries "Musikvergnuegen" and "Walter Werzowa"

I represent Musikvergnuegen and Walter Werzowa in arranging their Wikipedia pages, and I was wondering what I can do to remove the General Notability warning at the top of the entry. I saw that you had checked the pages, but I believe I have included reliable secondary sources. Please let me know.

Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.212.147.98 (talk) 17:22, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Reliable sources: Twitter?

Hey! I know we don't consider random blogs to be reliable sources of information, but does Twitter fall under that category? I ask because Nigel Lythgoe has an account, and his updates have included the [currently unsourced] information that Louis Van Amstel, Shane Sparks, and Wade Robson are going to choreograph/judge for SYTYCD this season. Since he's the producer, I would assume he's as reliable a source as we can get, besides news reporting and announcements on the show itself. What do you think? MissMJ (talk) 20:24, 5 June 2009 (UTC)


Despotate of Epirus languages

Could you please join Talk:Despotate of Epiros, and help us resolve an issue regarding main languages. The user Alexikua claims that Albanian migrations were limited and he moves Albanian language from main languages of the area to limited use languages. I have provided the necessary sources that clarify totally the issue of Albanian being a main language, but he just keeps reverting them. Could you take part in the clarification of the issue as you are an admin? --Sarandioti (talk) 10:48, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Hi, sorry for interrupting, it seems there was a comfusion about the language of the Despotate of Epirus, Saradioti cumfused the Despotate of Epirus with the Despotate of Arta (althought that's explained on the article's first line) which was Albanian speaking indeed.

The migration argument concerns the geographic region of Epirus not the identity of the Despotate of Epirus. Moreover the books he provides claim that there was a continuous struggle between the Despotate of Epirus and Albanian clans (however he claims the opposite that it was Albanian itself). Alexikoua (talk) 11:57, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Turkmen people and Turcoman etc

Hi, Woohookitty. I have noticed the large number of links you made recently to Turkmen people. Please know that many of these links are not accurate. Turcoman is a name assigned to the semi-nomadic populations of Oghuz Turks who inhabited large parts of Anatolia, the Middle East, and the Iranian plateau. It is primarily a historical designation. While the modern Turkmen people are related, the two groups are usually considered distinct. When I write the word "Turcoman" in an article, I tend to leave it unlinked as there is not yet a satisfactory article to link to. Perhaps the most accurate would be Oghuz Turks or the section of that article entitled Oghuz_Turks#Turcoman_.26_Turkmen. Aramgar (talk) 16:37, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for your quick response. Some of your changes however were perfectly appropriate. Regards, Aramgar (talk) 14:30, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

New article

Hi Woohookitty,

I am new to Wikipedia discussions so I do apologise if this is not the correct place to ask this :)

I recently added a new article that you deleted as being too advertorial.

What should I do or change to make this acceptable for Wikipedia?

Many thanks!

Alaskah (talk) 07:18, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Search/Replace Request?

Hi,
Is it possible to request a search and replace?
I've just had another one pass through my pages, modifying something I'd rather retrofit differently.

Thanks, Varlaam (talk) 16:10, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

Bluebird207

Hello

I noticed that You are in Anti-vandalism unit. I want to report that user Bluebird207 is vandalising articles about Opel Omega, Opel, Opel Rekord and couple others as well. His edits consisting eternally from deleting well sourced material and helpful internal links.


Couple of examples:


In article about Opel Omega he deleted way above 700 lines of text without adding any single line (I completely refurbished this article some time ago, adding lot's of informations and don't like that someone is simply using delete key without any sense or reason whatsoever). More than this, after my revert he done the same thing again!


In article about Opel Rekord he changed United Kingdom to UK without link - why?


This article is much interesting I don't know what for was this edit since completely nothing has changed: http://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Vauxhall_Belmont&diff=295645877&oldid=247783157


Given those informations I dare to say that he's only doing this to bounce up his edit counter.

Hope You'll help me with this

Shaman (talk) 12:54, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Indonesian arts

I dont think anyone has thanked you for your work on the many stray Indonesian articles and issues - thanks for that SatuSuro 15:42, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Template:Psychoactive drugs

Please could I have a look at the source code to the above template, which you deleted in August 2008? I promise not to re-instate it into the encylopedia, I will only post it to an un-advertised subpage of my user domain. I only wonder because for programming and wiki-historical purposes. Thanks :) Anxietycello (talk) 21:49, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 15 June 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 12:35, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

Your Disambiguation Efforts

Your efforts to disambiguate wikilinks are worthwhile, but see two things to complain about. First, it's often the case that what you're disambiguating is spam, and then your edit makes it a little more time consuming to undo the spam. See e.g. today's edits of John Tyndall and Alexander MacAulay. I suggest you wait for a week or two before disambiguating anything new, to give the ambiguous link more time to be cleared out as spam. Especially when the edit being disambiguated was from someone who isn't an Wikipedia:Autoconfirmed user. Second, it's not rarely the case that links you are taking trouble over are inane and worthless. In the two articles I just mentioned, for example, you changed the link from English to English people, whereas nobody reading an article about 19th century scientists wants to follow a link to learn what "English people" is. It would be preferable to delete the link altogether. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Seanwal111111 (talk • contribs) 17:23, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Honestly, I'm not sure how this can be considered "spam". That is one of the edits I changed. Listing a nationality of a person is definitely not "spam" by any means. This is another edit I changed and again it's not spam. And honestly, whether the user is autoconfirmed or not means absolutely nothing in terms of general editing. That only matters if the person wants to move a page or patrol a page or whatever. Both of the edits you are referring to are legitimate edits. The fact that the users do not have registered accounts or are not autoconfirmed does not make them "spam". As for your second point, I think that nationality is very important when it comes to articles about people. You are entitled to your opinion about nobody wanting to follow such links but they are in just about every article about a person, living or dead. --User:Woohookitty Diamming fool! 04:30, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
In the case of the edit to physicist Tyndall, the new text had removed him from Category:British_mountain_climbers whereas he is famous as mountain climber (see Weisshorn, Matterhorn); and placed him in category English_physicists whereas he's already in Category:British_physicists and furthermore he lived in Ireland until age 22; and introduced the notice that his ethnicity was English whereas he was not an English ethnic or any ethnic. In the edits to the mathematician MacAulay, the new text removed his name from Category:Australian_mathematicans whereas he spent the bulk of his working life at an Australian university; and said that his citizenship was English whereas his citizenship was British (and I suppose Australian also); and again makes the laughable edit that his "ethnicity" was "English" which I think is just silly because he wasn't ethnic. On the other point, I disagree with you when you say that nationality is important. In the context of mathematics and physics anyway. But no matter whether it's important or not, it is inane and worthless to have LINKS to well-known nations in the context of mathematics and physics history articles. There used to be a custom at Wikipedia to have a link to the day of the year of a person's date of birth, and also a link to the year of the person's date of birth. The custom has died out. I suggest for your consideration that the nation custom should die out too. Seanwal111111 (talk) 17:47, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
I actually didn't see the cat change. Having said that, just change the cat back then instead of reverting the entire edit. As for the nationality thing, again, you are entitled to your opinion but I think you are comparing apples to oranges. Yes the date is no longer linked but it's still there in the infobox and in the opening line of the article. You completely removed any mention of the nationality. The fact that you think its useless information is your opinion but it's not a guideline or policy on Wikipedia. Yes we no longer link the date (The archives on here have major discussions on the topic) but this was changed per consensus and not just based on one user's opinion. Do I think the nationality should always be mentioned? I think it's often useful as I think nationality tells you more about a subject than just the date of birth does. Nothing in the date of birth articles pertain to the subject but the nationality articles might. But in any case, I'm here to uphold consensus first and foremost and the consensus is to link them. --User:Woohookitty Diamming fool! 02:06, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
The fact that you are sometimes unable to discern between legitimate and illegitimate edits strengthens the case that you should delay your disambig efforts until a week or two has past after an ambig link is introduced. As a different kind of example, you have made a half a dozen disambig edits at Robert Boyle over the past few months, all of which were undone or redone later by others -- the article has had a lot of reversion activity. I suggest for your consideration that these have been a waste of your time and that you could use your valuable time more effectively by delaying for the week or two. A worthwhile link will stand for years. A week or two is nothing. The delay would also increase the use of time of others who, when using UNDO, are inconvenienced by the edit conflicts created by you. Incidentally, in the Tyndall and MacAulay articles I did not "completely remove any mention of nationality". Rather I removed one redundant mention of it; both articles still mention nationality more than once. Seanwal111111 (talk) 20:44, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
Another consideration is that many people don't have a single nationality -- that includes MacAulay who grew up in Britain and lived most of his life in Australia. It also includes Robert Boyle, and it is the cause of the reversion activity at the Robert Boyle page. I think the right way to solve such a reversion dispute is to not mention the disputed nationality in the article's first sentence, and let his nationality emerge from the details in the article, plus put dual mentions for nationality in the Categories at the foot of the page. That's what I did at the MacAulay article. The Tyndall article prominently declares his nationality in his infobox. Seanwal111111 (talk) 21:03, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Story -> Short Story

Re: my List of films based on war books

Hi, There is no precedent for using "Short Story" on any of my war film pages.

In the context of a movie, "story" does not necessarily mean "short story". Ok? "Short story" on my pages constitutes an error. Or has the potential to. I need the word "Story" because it is vague, and therefore accurate.

I have been talking to "RussBot" about how to retrofit that stupid column in my table structure where some guy decided 3 years ago that "Novel" and "Story" needed to be lookup fields, with 200 lookups on the word "novel" on every single page.

Thanks for disambiguating, but it's not helping the situation right now.

And please change every occurrence of "Short story" back to plain "Story". I don't like to see errors on my pages.

Thanks, Varlaam (talk) 14:42, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

And don't waste your time disambiguating "Play" or "Musical" either. We're going to solve this issue a different way. Cheers.

I even asked you about this issue up above on June 10. If you responded somewhere, I didn't see it. Sorry.

Start Box Discussion!

There's a discussion going on about the validity of these boxes and I was wanting to give you the opportunity to respond, which here is the link Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Tennis#Start_Boxes_Templates_for_Tennis_Player.3F! TennisAuthority 18:08, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Re: Well

I think the note at the bottom explains it well enough? If she received money for being favorite female dancer, that would logically mean she was ahead in the votes than Courtney. I'm just not sold on the idea of adding placements, because for all we know, Twitch may have gotten fewer votes than Katee and Courtney, but wasn't announced as such. I wish FOX/their accounting firm would just announce certified vote totals. >_< MissMJ (talk) 20:43, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

AfD notification

Hello, Woohookitty … FYI, it is courtesy to leave a {{AFDWarning}} on the talk page of an article's author when you nominate it for WP:AFD (although it's not very clear from the instructions) … I left a {{AFDNote}} for the author of Jack Lucien's Forthcoming Album, so you don't have to this time … Happy Editing! — 141.156.165.77 (talk · contribs) 00:04, 18 June 2009 (UTC)


Edit Cornovii

I have changed your edit of British to United Kingdom back to British. The United Kingdom did not exist until 1710, British in the fifth century ad is understood to mean of the Romano-Celtic Britons. Brythonek (talk) 14:29, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Infoboxes

Thank you for the heads up! I'm new at this and all the help I can get is appreciated! PanydThe muffin is not subtle 16:46, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Help deleting categories

Hi - I noticed you've done some cleanup on Bessie Smith. I was looking at the categories and saw that someone has been creating fairly useless categories and populating them with a few articles. e.g., Category:Road accident deaths in Mississippi. I'm having trouble figuring out the deletion process (they all qualify under Overcategorization) - could you help clean this up if you have the time and inclination? Thanks. - Special-T (talk) 23:29, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Substituted templates

When you see articles in template categories like this, it is usually caused by a substituted template. If you cannot figure out which template was substituted and fix it yourself, please add the article to Category:Substituted templates so someone else can figure it out and fix it. Thank you. --Pascal666 06:24, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Help creating new page

I am new to wikipedia and tried to add information about a new word that I created "resumini". You deleted it as an advertisement. What is the appropriate procedure for adding something new to the wikipedia? I will follow the guidelines. I just need a little assistance to understand them better. Tssys (talk) 11:14, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Done For Good: TennisAuthority and BasketballAuthority!

I am no longer going to be editing on wikipedia, so have a good day and good life PEACE be with YOU! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.240.44.215 (talk) 23:12, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Possesive User

  • Hi, I noticed you had left a message on the talk page of a user known as Varlaam and warned him about being too possesive of articles. He doesn't seem to have paid any notice as he is still continuing to act as though he is the sole owner of these pages, and often signs himself as "the editor" such as on the discussion page of the List of films based on war books — pre-1775. On my previous visits to wikipedia I was led to understand that personal ownership of pages was strongly discouraged.

I don't want to sound catty, becuase this user appears to have put in a lot of time and effort into these pages, but he has also used it to insert some non-neutral stuff as well. I'm not a very experienced user, and I wondered if you knew if there was anything that could be done about this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.157.89.44 (talk) 21:04, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 22 June 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:42, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Improved user space version of deleted article

Hi Woohookitty, just to let you know, there's a user space version of KIDO'Z, an article you deleted for being a pure advert. The user space version is at User:Alaskah/KIDO'Z, and there's a discussion at User talk:Alaskah about whether it's ready to move into article space. PhilKnight (talk) 12:19, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

universal dyslexia

Hi Woohookitty, I understand the reason for your edit on the dyslexia article, but i really do have a problem, as I need to somehow define what a universal understanding of dyslexia would mean. Currently most of the research only applies to North America and Europe, and more recently from China. Personally I do have a communication disability which causes me to be dyslexic, so your advice would be very much welcomed as to how we should try to best explain the meaning of "Univeral" to the readers of the dyslexia article and resolve this langauge comprehasion problem dolfrog (talk) 16:59, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Mistake...

Hi there. I think you left a message about a block on my talk page that you meant to give to user:varlaam.Singingdaisies (talk) 07:33, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

  • Thanks for looking out for me. I certainly will talk to you if I have a real problem. Honestly I wasn't all that bothered by varlaam. He left me alone once I said something. But I guess if he is a repete offender something needed to be done. Not everyone has a thick skin.Singingdaisies (talk) 07:58, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Genre vandalism

I noticed you're fixing the genre vandalism linking rather than reverting it, here is a most recent example of you doing this. Most of the time when something such as "heavy metal" is not linked properly, it probably means it was recently changed to that out of vandalism, it would be better if you could revert these edits instead of properly linking the link. Thanks. - GunMetal Angel 23:31, 29 June 2009 (UTC)


Hello!

Thanks for your contribution in here. By the way, I just wanted to say hello to someone. Since all the communication ways are blocked in Iran, I couldn't find anyone to say hello for several days! Have a good day or night depending on when you read this! Regards, --Breathing Dead (talk) 11:41, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

Surgeon-general

Could you explain the dab for surgeon-general please. They seem to be different appointments? Surgeon-general was the senior medical officer in the British Army? Kernel Saunters (talk) 11:12, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

Barnstar

You work very hard on here, and I know it's often done in the dead of night while many of the regular contributors (like me) are snoozing. When we wake up, you've been there. Thank you. MarmadukePercy (talk) 05:40, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
message MarmadukePercy (talk) 05:40, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

Crossover

Hi there! I noticed that in several places you disambiguated crossover on comics characters articles to intercompany crossover. While this may be appropriate in some cases, such as Superman meeting Spider-Man, or the Avengers meeting the Justice League, it doesn't seem to work in cases of Batman and Superman getting together, or when Marvel does a storyline featuring characters from several titles; I think the best thing to use when only one company's characters are involved would be Fictional crossover#Comics. 67.175.176.178 (talk) 14:35, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

Be more careful in disambiguation

I saw that you have changed "Pahlavi" to "Parthian language" in many pages. Most of these changes were wrong and counter-productive. Pahlavi doesn't always mean "Parthian language". Alefbe (talk) 10:17, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

I realize that since I didn't change them all to the language (quite a few went to Pahlavi Dynasty). But to me the ones I did change seemed to fit that description. The link on the disam page does state that it refers to the language and the speakers of the language. I don't do disamming without thought, trust me. I can be wrong but it doesn't mean I wasn't careful. --User:Woohookitty Diamming fool! 10:23, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

Hi, can you give me the list of pages of concern..I'll go through them slowly and change it. Sometimes though the references are ambigious. For example Pahlavi can mean Parthian, Middle Persian, Regional Iranian dialects or even modern Persian (Jami the poet says that the book of Rumi is the Qur'an in Pahlavi (Modern Persian)). Thanks. --Nepaheshgar (talk) 11:09, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
If you can undo the rest, I'll appreciate it. Just give me the whole list and I'll go through it slowly and will do it myself. --Nepaheshgar (talk) 11:22, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
Okay thanks. That is a large list and I'll try to do some once in a while I log in. --Nepaheshgar (talk) 11:35, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
Yes the Pahlavi dynasty ones are easy. Feel free to find those and change them. The harder ones are Zoroastrian and regional dialect ones. Thanks for your effort.--Nepaheshgar (talk) 11:37, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

Error in Template:FilmUS

Hi Woohookitty. Please correct your change in Template:FilmUS, now every article using this template has an unnecessary "</noinclude>" in the text. --Ilion2 (talk) 18:07, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Yes, I've just spotted this too. I'll fix the other templates that are broken too. Lugnuts (talk) 18:15, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Scots language

I caught this at Scotland Rugby Union. Scottish Gaelic is not the same language as Scots, Scots is a language close to English and is not a Celtic language. It is wrong to change links to Gaelic into links to the Scots language.GordyB (talk) 14:18, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

Apologies. I made 300+ edits last night so I can handle one mistake. :) Thanks for catching it. --User:Woohookitty Diamming fool! 14:23, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
That's okay, I thought you were using a bot and had made hundreds of similar edits. I wouldn't normally have bothered you over one edit.GordyB (talk) 15:25, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

delete?

Hey Woohookitty, would you speedy David Jofre? It's pretty obviously a resume, what with the hadshots and all, lays no claim to notability that I can see, and has no references that can count as reliable sources. I'm also asking so I can learn exactly what qualifies for a speedy and what doesn't. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 03:59, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 6 July 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:54, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

Marlboro Reds

I slapped the speedy template on it because it is "a full flavor cigarette in which the smoker gets the flavor he/she is craving for" made up a significant part of the article; another significant part was taken up by the results of some poll on the Marlboro website. Fundamental rewrite, therefore, I thought. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 20:16, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

World Marxist Review

Thanks for fixing my slopping editing at the WMR article. I had to interrupt the editing earlier than I thought, thus leaving a lot of links to disamb pages. Sorry for that. --Soman (talk) 09:11, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Tutshill

Please stop disambiguating Britain to Early Modern Britain, at Tutshill. The reference in the text to the date 1674 is to a fictional universe - the Harry Potter universe - and it seems obvious to me that it is highly misleading and just plain wrong to link from that statement to the real world article on Early Modern Britain. Do you see my point? Ghmyrtle (talk) 10:43, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Agreed - done - thanks. Ghmyrtle (talk) 10:50, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Pennants

Hi i see you have been changing links from pennant to Pennant (commissioning) on ship articles. Im just checking, is that the right article which it should be redirecting to? I would of thought Pennant number would be the correct article??? BritishWatcher (talk) 11:38, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

From what i know thats right yes. Pennant number is certainly the article that should be linked when talking about Ship numbers like M31 or K384. Today is the first time ive seen that article on Pennant (commissioning) but it sounds about right and makes sense. BritishWatcher (talk) 11:54, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

Original Area Codes

The title of Original area codes did not need to be changed. Back then these were the only area codes in existence. Plus only North America uses area codes to this day. Everywhere else uses country codes and versions of country codes. I think the original title was better.

FYI

It appears that nobody alerted you to this thread even though it is going nowhere and resolved. Just thought you would like to know anyways. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:56, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

Sorry about not coming to you directly. I guess I had an attack of paranoia. JRSpriggs (talk) 12:46, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

66.183.69.201

Hi Woohookitty. I have a complaint and question regarding the IP user. This person got into a heated debate with me regarding an article for deletion that was deleted. She made inappropriate accusations and has proceeded to delete her comments on MY talk page. I don't think it's appropriate to clean out someone elses' talk page. If it's not considered inappropriate, please let me know but if it is, I would like to request that the IP user is warned. She has been warned about her attacks on other contributors but not for clearing out another contributor's talk page. Hopefully you can help and clear up any misunderstanding I might have regarding guidelines on other contributor's talk page. Thank you for your time. Tree Karma (talk) 19:39, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

Carefull

If you have a good look at the repercussions of this edit of yours, you will surely be more carefull next time when using AWB inside templates. Mind you, it is not easy to spot, but you broke a template and a reference with that small and innocent looking edit. Debresser (talk) 19:17, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

Potential edit war on Brianna Stewart page

Hi- I just wanted to say that someone is putting in an unsourced claim on the Stewart page about how her story has been used for the upcoming film "Orphan". I reverted it back to your edit stating that unless they had a citation for this claim that it couldn't stay, but they changed it back. I did check on the internet & there's nothing by the production or writing staff to back up this claim. I am familiar with the movie & there is some similarity, but without proof it's all a hypothesis by someone. Can you step in & maybe do something to keep this person(s) from altering it? They don't have an account but I still posted on their talk pages- they just have an IP address. Thanks! Tokyogirl79 (talk) 10:41, 20 July 2009 (UTC)Tokyogirl79

Redirects

Do you have an opinion on where Oldest shipwreck should redirect? There is an active dispute between a list of shipwreck and what Wikipedia cites as the oldest shipwreck. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 08:32, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

Take care with auto redirects

This edit [1] was incorrect. The 1770-1772 plague was a regional case, not a pandemic. A correct subst would be plague -> Plague_(disease) had it not been for Russian plague of 1770-1772. I'd recommend you to browse through your recent auto edits and check for obvious out-of-context edits.

P.S. WP:NOTBROKEN still stands. Regards, NVO (talk) 12:35, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

Careful with themes

Hi, I notice you're disambiguating "themes". Just careful: in linguistics, there's actually two very different concepts: Theme (linguistics)(which is about semantic topics of a sentence), and Thematic vowel (which is about a word-formation element in Indo-European stems). Ancient Greek grammar needed the latter, not the former. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:15, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Hey, sorry if I came across as aggressive. No blame, just a heads-up. I appreciate the difficulties in this kind of work. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:18, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
Actually, now that I look at how confusing that linguistics section at Theme is, I can blame you even less :-) I'm trying to reorganise those links now. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:42, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
Hmm, no, Theme music and Theme (music) I think should be kept apart. The one is a whole piece of music in itself, and restricted to the use of music subordinate to other non-musical genres (like shows); the other is a structural part within a piece of music. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:55, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Woohookitty/Archive13&oldid=1166514278"