User talk:Wilton96

This is Wilton96's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Man vs Snake: The Long and Twisted Tale of Nibbler (June 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ringbang was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of films and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Relies on primary sources; does not pass WP:SUSTAINED.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Man vs Snake: The Long and Twisted Tale of Nibbler and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ringbang (talk) 17:18, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Wilton96, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Ringbang (talk) 17:18, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Man vs Snake: The Long and Twisted Tale of Nibbler has been accepted

Man vs Snake: The Long and Twisted Tale of Nibbler, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:09, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notes about article creation

Hi! I thought I'd drop by and give a bit of a note about the article. I accepted the article, however this was only after I spent a good 30 minutes cleaning up the article. All you did was put a long string of citations at the end of the article, which wasn't really all that helpful. While some of the sources are usable to show notability, you didn't format them properly, nor did you actually use them in the article. When using sources you're supposed to use them to back up specific details, like award wins or review quotes/summaries. You didn't do this in the article, which was sort of a bit on the lazy side. I don't mean that to sound harsh, just that I've seen people turn down articles at AfC. When editing you should assume that your hands may be the last one to edit the article and as such, you need to make it as complete as the sourcing and Wikipedia constraints allow. Don't assume that others will do the work for you and/or if they do, that they will do so in a manner that you'd like. Again, I don't mean this to be harsh, just that you really need to do more than just throw sourcing at the end of an article. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:15, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]